Reader comments
Church critics are offensive
128 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Jay Evensen: On second thought...
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
In Opinion
Across Site
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
52 - Letters: A changing Constitution
35 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Letters: Rights of conscience
25 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - The Gospel according to Obama
20












When it comes to tolerating you, you're right, I won't tolerate YOU forcing YOUR beliefs upon ME (and I won't apologize for it either).
Those that wear their idiocy and bigotry as a badge of honor.
"I am offended by the fact that this person could spew her anger at a [MINORITY] that has been around nearly as long as the tradition of marriage between a man and a woman. I am becoming less tolerant of the people who tell me that I am wrong for believing in my [OWN FEELINGS]. I guess I am getting tired of these people telling me that I should be accepting of [THEIR PARTICULAR RELIGIOUS SENTIMENTS]; meanwhile, they have no tolerance for me. I hope we never give up our [FREEDOMS] to appease someone with different opinions [OR RELIGIOUS POINTS OF VIEW]."
"I am very offended by the comments made by the "lady" who suggested the church helped defeat the idea of allowing gays to marry."
Uh, have you been reading the news? Our Church did engage in that deplorable act. By the way, we've elected a new president too.
"I am becoming less tolerant of the people who tell me that I am wrong for believing in my religion.I guess I am getting tired of these people telling me that I should be accepting of them; meanwhile, they have no tolerance for me."
First off, you don't sound tolerant at all so less tolerance from you may result in violence. Second, nobody is saying you are wrong. They are merely asking you not to tell them they are wrong. Maybe try increasing your tolerance level.
Finally, Brigham Young once said that only fools are offended when offense isn't intended but a greater fool is offended when offense is intended. I wonder which category you fall into? Good thing you live in Logan.
I get it, kind of like it being offensive for people to come to Temple Square to tell you your religion is wrong, but it is not offensive to send young men out to tell other people their religion is wrong.
It seems to me to be a matter of perspective.
So, is Utah going to pass a marriage ammendment that says marriage is between One man and One woman? or is that betraying the church? How would you feel about Baptists coming in from Georgia to fight for this new Marriage ban?
The bottom line is that if people don't like political reaction to their actions, they should stay out of politics.
I think that the Utah boycott will fail. People will come to Utah for many reasons.
1. They will think the lines are short because everyone went other places.
2. They will be glad that the gay factor will not be around, and they will feel free to bring their kids.
3. It will back lash on california and people will actually avoid it like the plague.
Have you looked up the definition of marriage? The first and third definition both state "between a man and a woman." A fourth definition has been added now that states you can qualify it by stating a homosexual marriage. Even this shows that it is different than a traditional marriage.
When will you get the point? No one is stopping you from living your lifestyle. We are just not allowing you to call it marriage. I do not understand why you feel a need to call an orange an apple. It is different. It is not the same as marriage. Why must you force us to accept that they are the same?
That said, LDS Church members and others who campaigned for and voted for Proposition Eight (a.k.a. Proposition Hate) are guilty of engaging in institutional aggression to deny equal rights for peaceful people.
As "V for Vendetta" reminds us, there is an insidious relationship between clergy and crown.
Randy: Take the wool from your eyes. Our society has been in decline since Bush became president. Two wars, an economy down the drain, many Republican politicians and their friends in prison.
I don't understand: when two people vow to love each other -LOVE - how can that be a negative?
Isn't love is what Christ teaches?
Oh well, I guess I have to drag my horse all the way to Massachussetts now. I feel so persecuted.