Reader comments: High school soccer: Miners capture Region 10 title

9 comments  |  Read story

Anonymous | 1:11 a.m. Oct. 10, 2008
Not taking anything away from Park City as they played a good game, but Waterford was missing their top defender who is committed to Pepperdine for Soccer and a very good offensive player that has committed to New Mexico.. Both of those players will be back for state
Anonymous | 7:31 a.m. Oct. 10, 2008
Park City was also missing two of it's top players due to injuries,defender Gina Ringelberg and midfielder Rachel Ritter.
Anonymous | 10:44 a.m. Oct. 10, 2008
waterfords starting keeper was also injured
Comments continue below
anonymous | 12:10 p.m. Oct. 10, 2008
Wow! From the comments already listed, it seems that Waterford has plenty of excuses when their team just wasn't goon enough to beat the Miners.
Anonymous | 5:37 p.m. Oct. 10, 2008
well... for going back to N. Carolina and beating a national team, park city isn't that great.
Anonymous | 12:05 a.m. Oct. 11, 2008
I am confused.Are we talking about the Park City High school team?I wasn't aware that they went to N.Carolina and beat a national team....
Soccer Fan | 8:27 a.m. Oct. 11, 2008
Waterford also got plenty of help from the officials in this lopsided affair. Park City is a really fun team to watch because they play such pretty soccer.
anonymous | 1:57 p.m. Oct. 12, 2008
Park City HS team isn't the team that went to n. carolina. That is a club team. Waterfords one goal was because of a ridiculous call by the referee.
Anonymous | 9:44 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
Both are excellent teams. Park City is stacked with talent and has a great passing game, and Waterford only has a high school of about 200 kids, so to tie and lose 2-1 is pretty good, especially for missing 3 starters. State will be fun to follow and will be a showdown.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.