Reader comments
Huntsman says state to monitor gas prices
28 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Business
Across Site
- Groups demand new probe into Marine...
- India, EU hope to reach free trade...
- Hong Kong asserts identity to...
- Cylinder buried in Bisbee reveals...
- India's global pharmacy role...
- Working at home improves employee...
- $25B settlement reached over...
- Brazil files injunction against Twitter
- Georgia N-plant would be first in a...
- APNewsBreak: Powell had 'incestuous'...
In Business
Across Site
- City Creek Center means uncertainty...
- Jon Huntsman Jr. joins Ford board of...
- Utah takes $171 million in national...
- Developing: J&J may invest $85m in...
- New downtown grocery store creates...
- States, banks reach foreclosure-abuse...
- States, Feds to announce mortgage...
- Fewer auto safety checks? House...
- 28 more airports will test...
- The dog ate the budget: The high cost...
In Business
Across Site
- Financial principles saved '02 Games
24 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
13 - Just a bluff? Fears grow of Israeli...
12 - 19 at Gateway look to City Creek
11 - The high cost of pets
7 - Designers lend their glamour to Obama...
6 - 'Halftime in America' ad creates...
6 - Pepsico to cut 8,700 jobs; 4Q net rises
4 - Army officer wants humanism...
4 - $148 million to spur growth
4










This is just another PR attempt by the governor to make us think he feels and understands our pain.
Every time a governor or attorney general has "threatened" to take action, it comes back the same thing; "Sorry, we can't find anything wrong. No laws have been broken. Just sit back and take the gouging."
Same stuff on a different day from a different governor. I'm looking for Shurtleff to weigh in again like his predecessors and say there is nothing he can do either except put the gas companies on notice he too is "watching." I'm sure the companies are quaking in their boots.
This seems to be the only product where producers get yelled at for charging what the market will bear. If I had a store, I would charge as much as possible to make as much money as possible. Isn't that the point? If people didn't like it, they wouldn't pay my prices and I would go out of business or be forced to lower prices. Econ 101 stuff here.
Walk, ride your bike, take the bus, stay home, or pay what it costs. Why would someone lower their price if you are willing to pay current prices?
Phew....that was a close one!
A second issue is ethics. Economists are notorious for not addressing ethics (or the lack thereof) as it pertains to prices. A classic anecdote is the cost of a snow shovel in a blizzard where you are the only store with snow shovels. What would you do with the price? You have already answered the question.
I do agree that the only way to fix the problem is not buy fuel. The governor�s office is going to do anything and most government agencies don�t have the power to. There are some alternatives which you do discuss but for the most part they are neither realistic nor long-term as a whole. I would love the government to cut to the chase and address the true underlying issues. Rather they will continue to adhere to the marketing spin of �we are monitoring the situation.� Yeah, whatever.
1. A secret agreement and cooperation for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose; a playing into each other's hands; deceit; fraud; cunning.
2. (Law) An agreement between two or more persons to defraud a person of his rights, by the forms of law, or to obtain an object forbidden by law.
When he first ran for office four years ago, during a press conference on the hill overlooking the state prison, he "suggested" that the state should consider moving the prison away from Salt Lake County. After the election, a small study was done and revealed what everyone already knew: the move would cost a lot of money. So we haven't heard from him since about this particular suggestion.
Then, after the legislature dismissed in April, he "suggested" that Utah's liquor laws might require review at the next legislature. He didn't suggest this while the legislature was in session, nor did he do so at any time prior to this year. The legislature will not meet again until after the coming election.
Now, again, he makes an empty statement about what many consider the issue of the day: gasoline prices. Again, the suggestion comes without any specifics.
There is a pattern here.