Reader comments: 2 Kiplyn suspects will be tried apart
6 comments | Read story
Investigator | 5:05 a.m. July 3, 2008
"Inconsistent defenses"? In an investigation that is what the whole thing is about. That is one of the best ways to show the defenses are suspect. In a package you can show where the lies are. When I was a brand new agent my supervisor said "a lie (told to you) is as good as the truth". If you can show that they are lieing then that is half the battle. Seperation of the cases allows them to lie in a vacuum and the jury is none the wiser. What, you gonna call Jeppson as a witness to show that Olson's lie is inaccurate? If they are tried together you can show that, seperate it is very hard. People that decieve this long usually start to believe their own lies are the truth.
Kevin | 11:50 a.m. July 3, 2008
Maybe they can be executed together.
maybe | 12:44 p.m. July 3, 2008
they can grow up and tell the Davis family where their poor daughter's body is so they can finally have some closure.
Comments continue below
Johnny | 12:57 p.m. July 3, 2008
Innocent until proven guilty, Kevin, innocent until proven guilty. Let's wait until after the trials to worry about that.
If you're called for jury duty, you'll have to decline because you've already made up your mind. Who needs evidence, right?
If you're called for jury duty, you'll have to decline because you've already made up your mind. Who needs evidence, right?
sob | 5:02 p.m. July 3, 2008
i think these guys have had the inclination to give everybody but the police the evidence,,,i guess they think that if they lie long enough, people will think they are innocent. to bad they aren't men, but abusers and wimps.
What kind of screw up | 6:02 p.m. July 3, 2008
No way I read that story right. "Mr. Jeppson may be highly prejudiced by the accumulated evidence against Mr. Olsen," Davis wrote in the ruling. "The prejudice is more than a mere possibility."
Well, I guess I did. Just can't believe that a judge would say something so blatantly dumb. Of course Mr. Jeppson would be prejudiced, but it would be by when he said he was with Olson.
I agree with cougarfan. This judge is a real nuklir sighentist alright.
Well, I guess I did. Just can't believe that a judge would say something so blatantly dumb. Of course Mr. Jeppson would be prejudiced, but it would be by when he said he was with Olson.
I agree with cougarfan. This judge is a real nuklir sighentist alright.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
