Reader comments
LDS Church backs marriage measure on California ballot
699 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- International Business:...
- Cards for cops
- Professor: Community work key in...
- Salt Lake City pondering spraying...
- About Utah: Modest M.D. had his day...
- Music industry lauds Utah's...
- Working at home improves employee...
- Lawmaker: 'Red flags' were there...
- Utah adoption notification bill put...
- Fewer auto safety checks? House...
In News
Across Site
- Families remain at odds over actions...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- City Creek Center means uncertainty...
- Worker: Josh Powell told son he had...
- Lawmaker: 'Red flags' were there...
- Horrific details emerge in Josh...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS Church, other religious groups...
- Layton police find body during fourth...
- 'I'm afraid for their lives,' Powell...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
178 - Teachers underpaid?
102 - Josh Powell, 2 kids dead in blast
91 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
83 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
53 - Powell tried to kill sons with hatchet
48 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
36 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - More to protect boys in Powell case?
29










With the errosion of marriage, which is changing people's views of marriage, more and more heterosexuals are living together and having children outside of wedlock.
Then even after the birth of a child they still do not marry, nor is the average after the 2nd child more than 50%.
With the errosion of marriage and the redifinition comes more and more people not considering it important. This errosion shall be quicker with the change in definition to include homosexuals.
The breakdownm of the traditional family (et. married family) is the center of most of our society's problems today.
Do you condemn any church that speaks out on moral issues? The Catholic Church on birth control? The Rev. Jeremiah Wright? The State of Texas for having "dry" counties? Where does free speech end?
I can't believe you three are condoning this type of behavior.
The Church can state and defend what God created. If you want to change God's laws to fit your own, then you should take it up with Him.
Quit blaming the Church for doing what is morally right.
Each person has the right to choose his or her lifestyle...and you tell the Church to stay out of your lives...Well you need to stay out of it, if it doesn't suit your fancy either.
Quit throwing the blame at everyone else and at the Church to make something that is not right seem right.
This is terrible.
As foretold, in these last days, we will not be able to stand with one foot in the church and one foot in the world.
Nothing new for those who choose to put God first, before ideologies, before friendships. It's always been this way. Choosing whom we will serve.
However, I find it interesting that those who choose to not follow God do it so loudly, proudly and openly, while those who choose to follow Him, do so quietly.
you can count out boo-boo, pookie and num-num as well.
As for me: I fear that precisely worded constitutional amendments are two edged swords that we members ought to prepare for. For example: today it is "... marriage is between a man and a woman ..." Tomorrow it may well be "... only in a public place; or, only by an ordained Christian minister; etc...", which attacks marriage in the temple.
In a war with sin and evil, Satan does not rest and seeks ever more insiduous ways to mock the holy ordinances of the Lord.
I will honor the words of the prophet and defend the sacred institution of marriage, but I am also girding-up for the next battle!
The LDS Church is using its authority and influence to try to shape society and the choices that are offered to citizens.
This was Satan's plan... remember??
Joseph Smith said to teach correct principles and let the members govern themselves.
Active LDS, by your own doctrinal definitions, you are now supporting the wrong side of this. A gay lifestyle may be wrong, in your teachings. But limiting the free agency of people is ALSO wrong in your teachings. You are now encouraged to give time, money, and 'do all you can' to limit choices of others.
Who's side are you on??