Reader comments: Hale's 'Little Women' charming but musically weak
2 comments | Read story
Benjamin | 12:39 p.m. June 4, 2008
I'll be frank and say that you haven't got a clue what you are talking about. Much of that cast is comprised of strong vocal talents with professional training and extensive performance backgrounds. A rehashed plot summary and nondescript generalities hardly qualify as a useful review. What musical background do you have to qualify you to be dismissive of reputable singers without any detail or explanation? This review smacks of a last-minute, mailed-in performance by a weak critic.
Suzanne | 10:49 p.m. June 7, 2008
I have to agree with Benjamin on this. You said the vocals are weak, but you never support why you think that. You just continue saying who was the exception to the rule. So, what was bad about it? Also I have to say a bit of synopsis is useful but there shouldn't be that long of one.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
