Reader comments: Jordan transition team continues closed meetings despite objections

3 comments  |  Read story

roaches and rats | 11:42 a.m. May 15, 2008
thrive in the dark
Oh brother | 1:18 p.m. May 15, 2008
Kim Horiuchi continues to stir the pot without any substance. How does she knows what they have talked about in closed meetings? They were closed!
public's business | 3:33 p.m. May 15, 2008
"As for any decision on the proposed plan submitted by a negotiating team, Haws said they plan to have a written response explaining their stance by the beginning of next week."

How can they prepare and release a written response if they don't discuss it first? The purpose of the Open Meetings Act is to allow the public to hear the reasoning behind decisions, not just the outcome. The public is as important (if not more so) to the process as the committee itself. How is the public to have input if they do not know what governing councils are discussing?

It is also ironic that transition team member Melissa Johnson (who is also a West Jordan city councilwoman) argued so stridently in the beginning to keep both the east and west transition meetings open. Maybe now she would like to do as her West Jordan City Council has done and just remove the microphones.
Comments continue below

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.