Reader comments: SB81 requires E-Verify checking for workers

8 comments  |  Read story

Anonymous | 6:06 a.m. Feb. 19, 2008
It does not have to be difficult, just require E-Verify, AND if the employer becomes aware that someone might be using a stolen identity, and does nothing, then he is liable. So simple a caveman could do it.
Sherrie M. | 6:39 a.m. Feb. 19, 2008
I hope with all my heart this bill is passed. Please, legislature help us overcome the blight of illegal aliens. All large employers have a reasonable dought when it comes to hiring large numbers of foriegn workers that they are illegal. My identity has been stolen by illegal aliens and I can't tell you the heartache it causes. Also my childrens ssn# have been used by unauthorized people. Please pass this bill!
steve l | 7:29 p.m. Feb. 19, 2008
I hope with all my heart that this bill fails and fails big. E Verify doesn't work. IF the bill simply did that, fine but this bill makes its a crime for those who cannot get papers right now, but are waiting for the time to come. If you were arrested for marry your spouse maybe you might think differently too.
Comments continue below
Real Swift | 7:42 p.m. Feb. 19, 2008
I find the comments by Swift executives pathetic. They must think we are fools to believe they had no idea these people were illegal. E-Verify isn't perfect but if followed would not discriminate against legitimate workers. There are safeguards and opportunities to correct bad data.
Stewart | 11:29 p.m. Feb. 19, 2008
The Swift boys should be thankful that they were using E-verify, or they would have suffered much more than the loss of illegal workers. This case gives an idea of how rampant ID fraud has become, and why local police need to get on board and help oppose ID fraud, whether by citizen or illegal alien. Also, another reason the IRS needs to support Home Land Security and ICE in searching out those guilty of ID Fraud.
Mario | 4:27 p.m. April 4, 2008
Chalk me up as a "victim" of this flawed e-verify system.
The system claimed that it can't verify that I'm a citizen.

Funny how that works considering :
1)I've voted, which being a citizen is a requirement
2)I have a US passport, which, once again, requires citizenship

I've been wondering why I've had such a difficult time landing a job despite over 9 years experience in my field. I wonder if this e-verify sham of a system is part of the reason why I had so many problems. I also wonder if this e-verify system is the reason why I was laid off after my previous employer was acquired.
KAT | 5:34 p.m. Aug. 1, 2008
Those that are against E-VERIFY have something to hide,and have something to lose. Here are the following groups:

(1) Those that are here ILLEGALLY!!

(2) Relatives, and friends of those that are

here ILLEGALLY!!

(3) Any family that wants cheap labor to take care of their kids/and or to cut their lawn.

(4) Corporate Businesses that want cheap labor.and other smaller Businesses/Companies..

(5) Others that have no clue that this E-VERIFY is to cut out the fraud of STEALING SOMEONE ELSES IDENTITY!!!!!!

ATTENTION THOSE THAT DON'T LIKE IT..

It is ILLEGAL to be here,work here,take U.S. services,when YOU DO NOT BELONG HERE!!!!! GET A CLUE.. You all should go to jail,and Deported,and our law that has misused about ANCHOR BABIES fixed..

** That law was for slave's kids born in the U.S. to become U.S. Citizens .NOT for any parasite to come here, and give birth here,and proclaim them a citizen.That is ridiclous,and needs to stop..All those don't realize the way the law was written.. look it up!
Anonymous | 5:41 p.m. Aug. 1, 2008
Any comments not posted are due to Liberals handling the comments,and you know who you are. Posting the FACTS/ TRUTH has never been in their belief to post..

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.