Reader comments
Don't count votes, west-siders urge

26 comments   |   Read story

Mom | 7:51 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
As an east side resident, I've always thought this proposal was heavily in our favor. I have 5 kids and love the idea of my rich neighbor's money going to my kids, but have never understood how it is fair to all the west side kids. How are they going to fund their schools? How can we in good conscience do this? Maybe a no count is a good solution until things get worked out a bit more.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
I agree | 8:09 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
I completely agree. I too am an east-side resident living in Draper and think the entire District division is immoral and unfair. I am glad that at least one west-side city is trying to stop the vote. My worry is for ALL kids, regardless of what side of the river they live on. I've always been very happy with Jordan School District and think people just don't understand why anyone would want something different.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Whay??? | 8:11 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
Fairness?? Are you kidding me? The East side pays far more than it's fair share, always has, and will continue to pay for West side schools even with a split. At no point in history has the West side been a net positive contributor to the East side schools. Fairness? Good conscious? Give me a break!




Recommend
Recommendations: 0
dtm | 8:20 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
The west side industries (Kennecot), built Brighton, Hillcrest,Alta and all the feeder schools long before there was any tax base on the east side. Copperhills and Riverton have only been around for the last 10 years, and now the east side don't want to build any more schools. I live on the east side and this is about the Mayors' egos. Each city is making a power grab. I have never heard one east side official say that this is in the best interest of the students. I only hear them say it will save their residents $20 a month in taxes. Is that what education suppose to be about?
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Tax payer | 8:27 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
You like the idea of your rich neighbors money going to your kids? Have you ever asked them how they like paying for your 5 kids?
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Steven Jarvis | 8:33 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
I am concerned still whether more schools in declining enrollment areas would be saved by this. What I think would be a better idea to have more local control while keeping the District intact would be a small parent elected board for each feeder system (ie One High School and all middle and elementary schools that feed into it).

These sort of boards do not need to be paid, while a new district administration will. If we do see a split the overall cost of administration is going to be doubled or tripled for the area as each city-district employees the necessary personnel.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Dad | 8:38 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
I agree with the article. Let them create a new district and then they can either build their own schools or purchase the schools and other assets that are there, from the Jordan school district. Those buildings, land and every other asset belong to the Jordan School District, not to those cities.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
evensteven | 8:47 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
Comments about who paid for what need some perspective. Kennecott did not build the east side schools any more than it built Washington County schools. In the late 1970s, Kennecott was taken of JSDs tax rolls and treated just like other large utility landowners such as Utah Power and Mountain Fuel. Their taxes went into a pool that was then divided up.

East and west side facilities have always, from the beginnings of the district, been funded overwhelmingly by east side taxpayers. You have no further to go than the district's own growth summit to see the population growth (and, thereby tax base grwoth) versus school construction. Even today, the east side is expected to pay more than half of the costs for all the construction for the next decade, more than 80% of which will occur on the west side.

And one comment about rich, MOM. The demographics show that the west side is about to eclipse the east side in terms of household income and property values. Your concept of rich is pure personal bias and is not based in fact.

The east side schould chose its destiny. Its only fair.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
evensteven | 8:51 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
One more comment about assets. If the east side taxpayers paid for the schools to be built, who really owns them? The Herriman Mayor's comments reveal a lack of honesty about how the district functions as a political subdivision. Given the recent dust up with Bluffdale over the Sorenson property, I would think Mr. Crane would be more sensitive to issues of self determination and the processes involved in changing political boundaries.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Selfishness | 8:56 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
As a community, we all bear the burden of insuring an educated electoral base. To the reader who entitled your comments "Whay??" I ask you, is $20/month too much to pay for the sake of educating our community's children?

You go ahead and answer that while I encourage everyone else to think of something other than their own pocketbook, especially when it comes to something as vitally important as the education of our kids.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
J.draper | 9:05 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
No one is addressing what is the best for the student, everyone talks about money. They will lose services. If you are not aware of this, you are ignorant of what opportunities Jordan District provides for its students. Do some research and you'll realize that no new smaller district can provide the same opportunities to its students. I grew up and attended Jordan school district and live on the east side. If you think you can just break off and have the same services you have not researched this issue very much.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Wrong | 9:37 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
To selfishness I say, I want that $20 to help remodel the eastside schools, not build new westside schools, because eastside students need to learn also. You may have fallen into the trap of believing this is just about money, but it is very much about the students and an opportunity to improve their educational experience.

To Jdraper: If you had studied this issue you would know that the services and opportunities currently being offered will remain. While we use the term "smaller", these will still be large districts.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Anonymous | 9:46 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
Its not my responsibilty to take care of everyone elses children by paying higher taxes. Do you believe in Socialism? It sure sounds like it. Ive already paid over $20,000 in taxes this year and you are telling me I should pay more. I dont even have any kids.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Mike | 9:55 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
I live in Herriman, and though I don't favor the split, I don't think we are very smart on trying to prevent it. Did England vote on the colonists seperating? Did the Union vote on the Conferderates leaving? Why do we have to vote on someone else wanting to leave. Wake up Southwest valley! They are going to split, instead of spending all this money and resources on trying to prevent it. Let's start thinking of the kids and what we can do to help when it happens!
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
L | 10:03 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
I don't live either on the east side or the west side but I find the various comments interesting.

I do agree with the west siders, that since they are currently effected ( and taxed ) by the proposal that they should have a vote.

I also suspect there are certain economies that are a result of the larger district thus some services will be reduced ( or taxes raised ) in order to continue at the same level.

Because I have observed "unhappiness" with "local" school boards in the past, it may not make everyone happy even if the split is completed.

The final analysis should be what is best for the kids.

I have a few words left in response to the question on how the neighbor likes to pay for the 5 kids next door. My observation is that he is better off than he would be if they were "uneducated." Indeed as long as we have not restriction on family size, we will have differences, but I think I do benefit from the education of children which are not mine biologically, that includes income to me as my potiential customers as well as their knowledge.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
JLT | 10:10 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
To Whay? I beg to differ. In the early 70's my husband worked as a loan officer on the east side of SL valley. Properties were not re valued for taxes regularly and our home on the west side which was worth $35,000 was taxed for as much and often more than homes homes valued at anywhere from 50-100,000 on the East side. Check the old tax records, if they will let you, and see for yourself.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Anonymous | 10:24 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
Think of someone else for a change? You do believe in socialism dont you? Thats the problem. People and cities can take care of themselves. Mike said it perfect. Spend the time and energy on fixing the problem rather than relying on the eastside.People on the West Side can overcome any problems they have to face. You make it sound like the west side is a welfare state who needs the east side to survive. The west side could flourish on their own. And if the split takes place the West Side will overcome the obstacles and wil prevail.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Re: L | 10:29 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
Thank you for your wise, calm analysis. You've given me additional fodder for thought.

When I go to the ballot box, I'll be thinking about more than money. I'll be thinking about the kids next door, whether that's 1 house down the road or 100 houses down the road. You are right. It's about all of us, and educated children from both sides of the river will eventually be my customers, employers, and even civic leaders.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Gaston | 10:58 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
Jordan School district is too top heavy and it has everything to do with it's size, every issue that has been brought up has to do with the conflict of intrest that such a large district causes.

The growth of the west side is a daunting issue and is getting much attention at the loss of attention to the east side issues.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
jDraper | 11:03 a.m. Oct. 3, 2007
To wrong, you're wrong. The westside tech center will not be in the eastside district, the eastside will have to contract with it like Murray and Granite does. And if you have a child with any disabilities as I do, you will not be guarenteed access to the westside facilities, and if the eastside is required to facilitate my child under the ADA and build facilities to accomodate her...there goes your $20 a month tax break. And by the way, Utah has one of the best funding programs in the nation. It equalizes funds throughout the state. My concern is for every student in the state, not just my own or the one accross the street. All students should have the same opportunities. I live on the east side and have 4 children in Jordan district. NONE of them has ever be deprived of an educational opportunity because they built schools on the west side. Do your research and look at how well Jordan does academically. It is also one of the most financially responsibly districts aroud and is considered one of the top districts in the nation. Why would anyone want to tear it apart for $20 a month?
Recommend
Recommendations: 0

No. Utah sees a major earthquake every 350 years. Last one? 350 years ago.