Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Readers' forum: Bush's failed policies
- Readers' forum: Home equity loans
- In our opinion: Altering 'No Child' law
- What others say: New crop of astronauts
- My view: Don't forget, you can dial 211
- Readers' forum: Teachers not overpaid
- One year later, it's time for Egypt...
- George F. Will: GOP no longer has...
- Jay Evensen: Think twice before...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Jay Evensen: Think twice before...
- Michael Gerson: Obama's assault on...
- Republican voters seem to be saying,...
- Walter E. Williams: Economic chaos ahead
- Readers' forum: Require drug tests
- Readers' forum: Taxing our children
- Readers' forum: Protect children
- Lois M. Collins: We honor U.S....
- Readers' forum: Why pay lobbyist?
In Opinion
Across Site
- Letters: Romney, the very poor
68 - Obama's assault on the poor
59 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
41 - Letters: America's safety net
35 - Letters: Refuse to compromise
35 - Letters: Don't attack Sen. Hatch
35 - Economic chaos ahead
25 - Editorial: Powell, unspeakably tragic
22 - Letter: Require drug tests
19 - Letter: Taxing our children
17










Because those who make the rules about what drugs we should and should not consume have alcohol consumption ingrained in their social lives.
In your Letter to the Editor you asked for help in understanding how we can subsidize alcohol.
There are other examples besides booze: Tobacco, high-fructose corn syrup, poor quality health insurance, worthless health foods. Big Alcohol is just one of a number of rich special-interest groups that make enough money to influence the choices made by our Congressmen inside the Beltway.
The answer to your question is ... Lobbyists!
Moderate drinkers tend to have better health and live longer than those who are either abstainers or heavy drinkers.
They have fewer heart attacks and strokes.
Moderate consumers of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine or distilled spirits or liquor) are generally less likely to suffer hypertension or high blood pressure, peripheral artery disease, Alzheimer's disease and the common cold.
Sensible drinking also appears to be beneficial in reducing or preventing diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, bone fractures and osteoporosis, kidney stones, digestive ailments, stress and depression, poor cognition and memory, Parkinson's disease, hepatitis A, pancreatic cancer, macular degeneration (a major cause of blindness), angina pectoris, duodenal ulcer, erectile dysfunction, hearing loss, gallstones, liver disease and poor physical condition in elderly.
Most of the world’s population uses alcohol responsibly. If that’s something you don’t want to do fine, but don’t make up lies about it being completely devoid of benefits.
So please keep your judgments to yourself.
I was taught in church that the wine of the new testament was non alcoholic. However the words of the New Teatament do not concur.
When Jesus made wine, he was questioned by the "lord of the feast", why did he provide the best wine after people were well drunk. Ususlly the best wine is provided first.
The New Testament tells us that Bishops are not supposed to be wine drinkers. Were it the case that no one was supposed to drink wine, this statement would have been un-necessary.
Writer of this article, you error in supposing that alcohol use has no legitimate uses beyond medicine.
Don't drink.
But follow the leader (conservative leader, Rush Limbaugh) and pop OxyContin all day long.
LOL!
Tell you what. I'll admit no one is personally responsible enough to have a dozen beer in their home if you'll admit they are also not personally responsible enough to have an assault rifle in their home.
And how does Rush enter this foray? You libs really need some counseling to help you get past this guy.
Researchers from McGill University in Montreal surveyed nearly 3,600 Canadian men aged 35 to 70 and found those who averaged at least a drink per day had higher risks of a number of cancers than men who drank occasionally or not at all.
Many studies have suggested that moderate drinking -- usually defined as no more than a drink or two per day -- can be a healthy habit, particularly when it comes to heart disease risk.
But the current study suggested that even such moderate drinking levels are linked to higher risks of certain cancers, at least when the alcohol of choice is beer or liquor.
Alcohol is a drug. It kills brain cells, which do not regenerate. It is a barbituate, slowing things down. It lowers inhibitions and distorts sensory perceptions, reason, and physical reactions. It is a major factor in divorce, abuse, crime, lost productivity, and many illnesses and accidents. It is addicting, physically and socially. It is a tool. I have never 'missed out' on a moment due to abstinence.
I thought EVERYBODY knew that?
They don't like it when they are reminded of this fact.
But the answer to the letter writer's questions is: because the state controls it.
Alcohol is taxed up the wazzu and is controlled by only being allowed to be sold in State run stores.
Meanwhile, freedom means "live and let live".
You can't FORCE others to do what you want them to do. That's called control. I'm against it.
And I've been to Utah County, the hotbed for this. I can't get out of there fast enough. My skin crawls.
No wonder it's a problem there.
Lisa
You have more intelligence in one of your eyelashes than any 5 of our legislators have combined.
Mike in Sandy
Ann