Reader comments
Earmarks unbridled
6 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- John B. Quigley: American forces do...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- In our opinion: Tinkering with...
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
- Readers' forum: Voting for principals
- Readers' forum: Bush's failed policies
- John Florez: The changing face of...
- The winners and the losers
- Readers' forum: Teachers not overpaid
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Readers' forum: Home equity loans
In Opinion
Across Site
- Obama's assault on the poor
62 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
49 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Economic chaos ahead
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letters: Rights of conscience
22 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - Letter: Require drug tests
19







While the process may not appear "fair," the risk of having no direct impact on how federal money is spent and directed to states and districts risks that federal bureacrats, who have no incentive to really learn about the needs of specific states and communities, will allocate those funds that will benefit their "pet" interests -- rather than the interests of elected officials. The earmark process encourages federal money to get to local communities rather than those "connected" into the federal government's bureacracy!
Think about it. Who do you trust more? Your elected officials OR some nameless bureaucrat office in Washington DC.
Congress spends our money. Do they do it by voting on a specific issue and deciding if it needs federal dollars, or to the take money that has been budgeted to a department away from that department and give it to their friends.
It is time earmarks were no longer the return on investment for big money, incumbents re-election campaigns, or lobbyists.
A city shouldn't have to pay some lobbyist to donate to a campaign fund of someone back in DC to get the help they need from the federal government.
I like the way Rep. Jason Chaffetz is doing things. Keep it up. It looks like it is time for Bring home the bacon Bob to retire.
They don't change how much money is spent.
Lets stop worrying about earmarks and start worrying about preventing government from unconstitutional spending.
How about a balanced budget amendment and how about a repeal of the 16th and 17th amendments. That would put government back in its proper role.
Amount Returned to State per Dollar Paid in Taxes:
Utah Ranks #13 in Returned Dollars @ $1.61.
Seems we are sucking up to the US gov better than 37 other states.
BTW, New Mexico ranks #1 @ $5.00
Alaska #2 @ $4.81
Source: The National Priorities Project
shouldn't Utah get something for it?
HOW much land has the government taken in those other 37 states?