Reader comments
Readers' forum: Letters: Earmarks unbridled
6 comments | Read story
Congress spends our money. Do they do it by voting on a specific issue and deciding if it needs federal dollars, or to the take money that has been budgeted to a department away from that department and give it to their friends.
It is time earmarks were no longer the return on investment for big money, incumbents re-election campaigns, or lobbyists.
A city shouldn't have to pay some lobbyist to donate to a campaign fund of someone back in DC to get the help they need from the federal government.
I like the way Rep. Jason Chaffetz is doing things. Keep it up. It looks like it is time for Bring home the bacon Bob to retire.
They don't change how much money is spent.
Lets stop worrying about earmarks and start worrying about preventing government from unconstitutional spending.
How about a balanced budget amendment and how about a repeal of the 16th and 17th amendments. That would put government back in its proper role.
Amount Returned to State per Dollar Paid in Taxes:
Utah Ranks #13 in Returned Dollars @ $1.61.
Seems we are sucking up to the US gov better than 37 other states.
BTW, New Mexico ranks #1 @ $5.00
Alaska #2 @ $4.81
Source: The National Priorities Project
shouldn't Utah get something for it?
HOW much land has the government taken in those other 37 states?
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Visit to paradise nightmarish for Ags 12:32 a.m.
- Utes struggling to shake starts 12:31 a.m.
- Cougars' execution flawless 12:30 a.m.
- Utah Jazz fall apart against Kings 12:17 a.m.
- 3A football: Tigers pull away 12:12 a.m.
- Editorial: 'Immigrant' children needy 12:12 a.m.
- Reagan, Thatcher and the pope 12:12 a.m.
- Cougars come up short of title 12:11 a.m.
- Colorful observations on ethics, more 12:11 a.m.
- Elections offered few new themes 12:11 a.m.
- Gay advocates trek to LDS office
207 - Dirk does dirty work in Dallas
190 - Lobo suspended
171 - Speed has never been BYU's game
136 - Cougars crush hapless Cowboys
128 - House passes health care bill
111 - RSL rallies to advance
102 - Prep football: San Juan vs. S. Sevier
102 - Thousands protest health bill
100 - Provo company innovating engines
98
Nothing proposed would keep young adults from learning of the reality of sex,...
the only "decent" team we played we lost to? I guess that Air Force isn't a...
I am watching the game again, and it is awesome!!!
I can't help but laugh inside when I read comments from YBU/TCU fans who...
(from the independant) I like Dennis Miller.... and Bill Maher, although I...
As a BYU alumnus, I can't justify to myself ever donating another dollar to...
Not a chance. Don't get me wrong they are both studs, but if Asiata wasn't...
Titan Fan, sorry that some of your best players got hurt. I hope they...
So sad how fear based so many are.
Will the Jazz even make the playoffs this year. The way they are playing it...


While the process may not appear "fair," the risk of having no direct impact on how federal money is spent and directed to states and districts risks that federal bureacrats, who have no incentive to really learn about the needs of specific states and communities, will allocate those funds that will benefit their "pet" interests -- rather than the interests of elected officials. The earmark process encourages federal money to get to local communities rather than those "connected" into the federal government's bureacracy!
Think about it. Who do you trust more? Your elected officials OR some nameless bureaucrat office in Washington DC.