Reader comments
Mall owner seeks to retain zoning
17 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Committee will explore new '22...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
87 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - Gay rights and religious liberty
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







The tax payers have invested too much money and have the right to demand payment or release of the property to the taxpayers. This company received more than tax incentives, they also got funding from the board of education, $20 million dollars worth. Not only should it be rezoned, we should seize the property for non payment on tax payer loans.
The land should be redeveloped in to other uses, as a mall it is marginally accessible and the streets are insufficient to withstand the traffic load. The other uses planned are also questionable and very prone to failure and misuse. Before long this project will become a haven for crime and sever deterioration. For this company to maintain the land will become too costly and ignored as it struggles with other economic losses.
Giving tax cuts are not the answer because when consumers are nervous about the economy they will not spend. If you give people tax cuts they will just save it because they are nervous.
The federal government has to inject money(debt) in order to get money flowing again. Where they make mistakes is not doing direct high impact projects like building highways and infastructure.
They also make a mistake by "borrowing money." The federal government has the power to create money. It is stupid to pay interest on money you created out of thin air. The solution is to directly infuse this debt into the american economy creating american jobs and taxing accordingly to avoid inflation. Taxing properly instead of paying interest on our own money is cheaper but politicians do not have the courage to tax people because it will hold them accountable on the debt they are producing.
Thanks for the facts. Looks like Holladay threw the dice and lost. At least nobody else is on the hook.
As for commercial development the economy points to some things your city might look into.
Payday lenders, Dollar store, Pawn shops, Thrift stores, and Tattoo parlors. They do very well in the rest of the county.
The mistake is shared by both city and developer. They now share the obligation to develop a plan to optimize the use of the land from now until the economy picks up enough to proceed, probably years from no.
As for the "gun to the head" comment, they are strong words, but it is wise for Holladay to keep pressure on General Growth. As the article notes, they own (and are probably struggling with) more than 200 malls across the country. Holladay cannot afford to let the Cottonwood Mall site to fall to the bottom of General Growth's priority list.
CougarKeith - it's time to stop ranting and start proposing solutions.