Reader comments
20 Utah law professors back Sotomayor
38 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Prepare so an earthquake doesn't...
- Is technology making us stupid?
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- View live stream of services for...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
90 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







A) She's against the 2nd Amendment to such a degree that she believes anyone who currently owns a gun is breaking the law.
B) As a judge in a lower court, she ruled that white firefighters shouldn't receive a promotion because no non-white firefighters qualified. That case went to the Supreme Court two weeks ago and (thankfully) was overturned.
Sotomayor is a racist and gun control fanatic. And neither has a place on the Supreme Court.
Perhaps, instead of parroting others, you should actually read the source material.
I am sure that theses Professors have lost touch with the man on the street ages ago.
Too bad for the common man.
Not true. The only reason the 2nd Amendment is still in tact is because of a SUPREME COURT DECISION from last year where it was upheld 5 to 4. That's right. 5 to 4. One judge made a world of difference.
And whoever it was claiming I was ignorant of "the facts," I love how you just threw that out there and ran for the hills without countering with any of YOUR "facts."
Wake up.
Get prepared our rights are going out the window. No guns for sure.
Disgusted.
The fallacy of statistics. It took 5 judges to uphold the decision, not 1. The difference was 1 judge, but it took all 5.
Or perhaps more simply put: Which judge was the difference?
I will question anything & everything until I come to the conclusion I am comfortable with, because when you mix arrogance with ignorance you will have a volatile failure!
of course this is my uneducated opinion!
Fine, let's do the math your way. 5 judges preserved our rights. 4 judges trampled them. 5 minus 4 is still what?
I suppose basic math is a fallacy in your world too.