Reader comments
North S.L. residents to vote on recreation tax

4 comments   |   Read story

Really necessary? | 5:19 a.m. July 8, 2009
Is it really necessary to add a permanent tax to fund a short term project? What are they using their stimulus funds for? This kind of project is what the Obama plan of stimulus funding is meant to fund. Taxes in any form for any reason is regressive and in a recession is not the time to add more taxes. This project should wait for better times and after the economy shows some improvement. Who knows, this so called tax base of industrial shops may not be around long enough to pay for the project and then the citizens are stuck with a long term tax and still not have a park.
Shameful | 9:16 a.m. July 8, 2009
City leaders pushed through a $20 million dollar bond issue a few yars back to pay for the rebuild of the Bountiful Rec Center clear over on th ecenterville border and now they decide to tax us again to build a park that the city needs?

Shame on you so called leaders!! When residents years ago wanted the bond money to build local parks and Rec centers you told us citizens it was a good idea to pay for Bountifuls rec center and now you come back and tax us again?? for a local park. You should have built local in the first place, Let BOUNTIFUL PAY FOR THEIR OWN REC CENTER and saved the NSL residene $20 million that you watsed.


Shameful, pure shameful, I hope the residents wake up and final vote in some real leadership.
Foxboro Resident | 10:54 a.m. July 8, 2009
I currently live in the Foxboro Community in North S.L. and raising the sales tax even .1% to add a park to Foxboro North, where development has died and the developer has filed bankruptcy (Woodside Homes) is a joke. We have a park in Foxboro, we have a nature trail & loop as well as the legacy trail in our community.. All of them are under utilized, why do we need to add another park?
Comments continue below
For the Wealthy  | 9:33 p.m. July 8, 2009
The Foxboro park is a ruse so that the wealthy elite on the east side hill can get a park to ad to their Golf Course at the expense of the poor tax payers.

How much does that Golf Course cost us tax payers of North Salt Lake anyway??? The majority of us get no value out of it either??

I think it is time for the leadership of North Salt Lake to be elected from the west side of HWY 89. and let the wealthy pay their fair share for a change.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

TWO HITS: Kruger hitting Heaps — Heaps hitting the ground —...

Rep. Bishop, you claim that cap and trade doesn't work, yet you conveniently...

Rich is 1 what?

What... no BCS BOWL win. What a shame, the number one game in his college...

I know this one person never having time to care for these two dogs she...

Here are Max Hall's Top 10 wins

He took resposibility - he apologized Those who wish to continue to crucify...

New hope to unwed dads in Utah

Utah is basically a baby marketing state. The way LDS social services runs...

Props to Max Hall for his career accomplishments. I had an issue w/ his...

pulled his famous "Houdini dissappearing act" he does it all the time

Re. the photos -- there are only men shown in the closeup, true. But unless...

Advertisements