Deseret News | Reader comments: Some UTA buses ignore 'no idling' signs at U.

Reader comments
Some buses ignore 'no idling' signs

Randall | 10:53 p.m. July 3, 2009

If it's an area where buses idle for a long time there should be hookups installed just as in truck stops so the buses do not have to idle to have AC and lights.

The UofU loop and the transit station seem like natural locations for these hookups.

And let's not award the contract without bidding.

Jim | 5:16 a.m. July 4, 2009

FOR PASSENGER COMFORT ? then idle for 3 minutes off for 5 idle for 3 off for 5...DUH and the lights work without the engine running....JEEZ what a stupid remark...

Cincinnatus | 8:20 a.m. July 4, 2009

I sat on a bus one evening where the bus driver shut down the bus for a few minutes, but said that he had to turn it back on because the electronics in the bus can't be turned off and will drain the batteries quickly. Left off too long, the bus would be unable to start. I asked what they did with the bus at night when the engine wasn't going. He told me that they have outlets where they plug in at the garages to keep the electronics going all night.

Having a bus that needs to consume power nearly 24 hours a day seems to be as bad as idling buses. If a bus manufacturer can't create a better bus, perhaps UTA should look to purchase them elsewhere.

Comments continue below

geedub | 11:12 p.m. July 4, 2009

Why are the buses stopped? Should they be driving around picking up passangers? Who cares about emmissions, I want to know why they're parked.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.