Reader comments
Innocent man jailed; victim now charged
26 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












"All along, the only reason he was pleading guilty was to secure the plea bargain," Howell said. "I definitely think that people end up pleading to crimes they didn't commit simply because the risk of going to trial is so great."
And the risk of going to prison for something you haven't done is great, too. My husband took a plea bargain, very reluctantly, when he was accused of improperly touching our granddaughter, because if he was found guilty, he faced the possibility of 15+ years in prison. (And how do you prove your innocence when there is no evidence except the word of a 10-year-old child who thinks it's a fun game to get people into trouble. She's still doing it to others now.) So he spent 6 months in jail, is on 5 years probation, and 15 years on the Sex Offenders' Registry, and he did nothing to deserve it. It has ruined our lives, our finances, our plans for the future. The answer? I don't know, but courts need to be more careful to get the truth first.
Please don't tell me this is standard procedure to lock up people based on the detective skills of inebriated individuals and without a single witness or shred of evidence? C'mon guys!
They also had a law whereby if a person bore false witness to a crime, implicating someone who was innocent, the penalty was for that person to suffer the same penalty that the person he bore false witness against would have had to suffer.
In other words if you falsely accuse someone of murder or theft, you will suffer the penalty of murder or theft.
It would be my guess that "Hater" probably has contempt for any authority figure who crosses him/her/it in any form of justification.
What could they have done???
On the other hand, seriously guilty, dangerous people are loose because investigations aren't complete, charges aren't taken seriously, victims are blamed or they don't dot their i's and cross their t's. Mistrials are declared, freeing murderers if there is perception that someone charging or convicting them made one error, or some attorney can find anything at all to excuse them. Even when there is no doubt the person is guilty, we let them go free because now they have a "better" lawyer who is not worried about truth and justice; only defending their client by using a technicality. It's a scary legal system we've evolved into that should be based on truth.
The fact that law enforcement just jumps on them as sources shows how their focus is really on just putting someone in prison, not on putting the RIGHT person in prison.