Reader comments
Fame killed Jackson
13 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- John B. Quigley: American forces do...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- In our opinion: Tinkering with...
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
- Readers' forum: Voting for principals
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Bush's failed policies
- John Florez: The changing face of...
- The winners and the losers
- Jay Evensen: Think twice before...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Obama's assault on the poor
62 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
51 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Economic chaos ahead
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letters: Rights of conscience
22 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - Letter: Require drug tests
19







There are lots of famous people that don't go weird like Jackson did.
Recently some children were suspected of vandalising a young man's car, and he sought to teach them a lesson. The victim was very young, and, I imagine knew full well that the police and courts could not or would not punish child crime.
The mother showed on camera that she thought the crime was trivial. I can guess where her children, if they are indeed guilty, got their sense of privileged entitlement to damage the lives and properties of others.
The victim was wrong to take things into his own hands but I also know it is frustrating to live in a society that enables young criminals and, instead of punishing, protects them from punishment.
You cannot punish a child; the law will not punish a child. The child goes unpunished and becomes a menace to society. What a mad society we have created.
He was on so many different meds that his body finally said "Enough!. See ya!"
Mike
He was the meal ticket for a large entourage of hangers-on and no one would question bad decisions or lapses in common sense at the risk of being kicked off the gravy train. Heaven forbid, they might have to find a real job.
Michael is not blameless, but he was more of a victim than a willing participant.
And what about the every day person that died for one reason or another. Where is all the sadness from their affairs.
So, don't tell me "no one was looking out for his best interest." Many were looking out for his best interest but were rejected by MJ, who, with his money and fame, had a huge circle of "friends" that included some enablers who were not as strong as real friends who were in fact telling him no. MJ made his very own choices, and was in fact the most "willing participant" in his ultimate demise.
Not good.
Which of our freedoms of association, expression, commerce, thought, etc. would you limit to make sure we all properly prioritize celebrities in our lives in order to give them proper perspective and save them from self destruction? Shame on us for liking his music? For going to his concerts? For being curious about bizarre human behavior?
Who is the responsible "collective," the million who purchased an album to make it platinum? In America that's 1 out of 350 people. Perhaps the partially responsible "we (collective)" is really a very small percentage of a very large stage. I don't feel I need to be absolved of anything related to Michael Jackson.