Reader comments
Stop anti-Obama letters
114 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Jay Evensen: On second thought...
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
In Opinion
Across Site
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
52 - Letters: A changing Constitution
35 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
25 - Letters: Rights of conscience
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - The Gospel according to Obama
20












If this is not alarming to you, the DN's should not print another one of your letters until you get better informed, and serious about the usurpation of the highest office in the land.
After that is resolved we can then go down the road and discuss the other unconstitutional things this man continues to do.
Perhaps you should be a little more intelligent next time you come crying to the DN about "Anti-Obama" letters. Perhaps you can research the word "HYPOCRITE" prior to writing such non-sense!
Now that the shoe is on the other foot you expect us to kneel and kowtow to President Obama and not critize him on anything that he does.
From the tone of your comments is sounds like you want to suspend the 1st Amendment rights of those who do not agree with him, or with you.
I say publish everything they say. Shed light on their leaders (Limbaugh, Palin, etc.) and their all-about-me philosophy whenever it comes up.
This makes it easier and easier for the mature Americans at the voting booths.
This is exactly why Obama and his supporters should have verocious critics
I have yet to meet a "mature" liberal. You just confirmed that yet another "INMATURE" liberal is running rampant.
Big spending (two wars, tax cuts, Medicare D)
civil liberties (habeus corpus, patriot act)
lack of transparency
Expands power of the executive branch (signing statements).
So now if Obama
spends (stimulus)
attacks civil lberties (prolonged detention)
has a lack of transparency (photos, visitor lists) expands power to the executive branch(census, czars).
So now republicans can only be petty or hypocrtical, becuse they are guility of many of the same things.
Everyone seems to miss the disturbing similairties, and the direction the two party system is leading us.
They are blind to the complete idiocy of the 8 Bush years...the lies, the cover-ups, the lining of the fat cat's pockets. The total disregard for "government by the people", and their "government by and for the rich people".
They have a chance to make up for Bush,but they offer up a lunatic octogenarian and a ditzy broad.
Well done GOP.
Go ahead and keep on crying. It's going to be a long 8 years for you.
Mike
Did anyone ever stop long enough to think that maybe those 2 parties may both be wrong?!!!
Most people are like children simply amused by watching a Punch & Judy show, each one knocking around the other.
Meanwhile, never realizing the entire show is being controlled by a single puppeteer?!!!
Think about it.
Don't be a Sheeple.
Bush is NOT a darling of the right, people. He stopped being that a long time ago. Why do you think he was stared out of office by below-30% approval ratings? Or why his father plummeted 40 points prior to his defeat by Clinton?
Unlike liberals, conservatives are famously independent when it comes to supporting their national leaders-we abandon them fast when they mess up. Why do you think Clinton never fell below 50% during his IMPEACHMENT, of all times? Because lefties blindly hung on to "their" guy. If Clinton were a Republican, he would've been kicked to hte curb by those independent-minded conservatives like he should have.
In other words, both the Democrats and Republicans are bad. We need to vote all of them out of office, not just "the other guy".