Reader comments
Buttars broke vow of silence, senator claims
129 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Jeffs ex-bodyguard claims FLDS leader...
- Brigham City pill doc loses...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Susan Powell’s father interview: I...
- Ask a Cop: No-knock search warrants
- Three injured in S. Jordan gas explosion
- Training for the unknown: how...
- Photo shows Josh Powell the day...
- Arrest made in Kearns shooting,...
- Officials searching for missing plane...
In News
Across Site
- Lawmaker: 'Red flags' were there...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Families remain at odds over actions...
- Worker: Josh Powell told son he had...
- City Creek Center means uncertainty...
- Layton police find body during fourth...
- Horrific details emerge in Josh...
- Fewer auto safety checks? House...
- LDS Church, other religious groups...
- Committee will explore new '22...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
179 - Teachers underpaid?
102 - Josh Powell, 2 kids dead in blast
91 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
86 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - Powell tried to kill sons with hatchet
48 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - More to protect boys in Powell case?
29










Thank you Mr. Buttars, Mr.Stevenson, and other political leaders who chose not to take the popular stance but chose to follow their moral compass.
Ok....
This proves that all the talk about marriage has been totally bogus. It's never been about protecting traditional marriage, as we've been told. They all just think that homosexuals are immoral degenerates unworthy of rights.
History will not be kind to the Mormon religion.
We'll bet it would not be nearly as dark as it is being painted, because...
In his previous incident, about some legislation being a "dark, ugly thing", I saw and heard the actual context of his words. Then the media reported a sound-bite, and the opinionated ran away with that, making it sound far worse than the original. And repeated and repeated and repeated it, until "everyone" thought that was the whole story.
I may not like his way of saying things, but neither do I like most politicians' way. Whether I agree with him or not, he does have the right to speak freely. Or at least in the America I remember.
If Senators Stephenson and Stowell agree with most of what Sen. Buttars said, and think the bulk of people in Utah also agree, why is he being stripped of leadership posts? Oh yea, because of an "agreement" in the caucus.
Sounds to me as if the senate is as spineless as our govenor on this issue. Thank heaven the "equality" bills were killed in the house. The senate probably wouldn't have.
I say to Sen. Buttars, "Don't let your wimpy colleauges talk you into resigning over this issue!!"
Des.News you do a disservice to your customers, when you do stuff like that.
History will not be kind to Mormons.
First, we've got all these lawmakers in Salt Lake City who believe that they have a directive from God to rule a state according to their own interpretation of the commandments.
Second, we have those lawmakers restricting the free and open speech of their elite club members.
And then, of course, we have a host of citizens who believe that sexual practices bring civilizations to ruin, when it's actually only lawmakers that claim the illustrious title of society destroyers.
Think about it. Kings and magistrates hired men to write the scriptures. They had a gullible, pious market to sell their canon to. If they wrote the truth, that empire building and taxes destroy nations, then they had a very hard time getting taxes and soldiers to do their dirty work.
If, on the other hand, the people could be made to believe that their own sexual habits would be their ruin . . .
Here we have law makers once again telling us that the citizens are at fault for our nation's demise, when it's actually their own fault. Shame on them.
Senator Waddoups conveyed a sincere desire to do what is best for the Senate after expressing a commitment to free speech, but taking into consideration all of the various demands by so many different groups (not only the democrats, the media, the LBGT community, but apparently conflicting demands from within the Party as well).
This convtroversy could be drawing to a close, but now we have to read this, which makes it worse, not better. The irony is that I don't think Stephenson et. al. were appointed to speak for Waddoups.