Reader comments
Civil-union stance of guv spurs protests
195 comments | Read story
What a great and momentous thing Huntsman has done!
We are seeing superior leadership as this state never has before.
Thank you Mr. Huntsman.
Going against the church stance, you wonder if he has a conscious?
Huntsman, on the other hand, is very clear on what he believe in and what he does not. Whether or not you agree with him you have to admire the fact that he has bothered to figure that out.
After Prop 8 exploded, the LDS Church says it does not opposed civil unions, just gay marriage.
The governor says he supports the idea of civil unions.
The Eagle Forum and Chris Buttars oppose civil unions.
Looks to me that the governor is in "good company."
Whose side are you on?
"a political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them"
The Founding Fathers purposely moved away from a monarchy. No matter how pretty his words, no matter how politely he speaks, his actions are not that of a Republic leader. And please, do not remind me that Ms. Roskelly stated the majority of the calls to the Governor were to say thank you. She is a spoke person for the Governor not the people. With 66 percent of the people in this state conservative....I sincerely doubt that Governor Politician Huntsman is representing the majority of people who voted for him.
HB 267 should be shredded as is. It asks for approval or at least legal recognition of GLBT status and could hurt churches, scouts, and others' ability to require a moral code of ethics.
Any executive order from Gov Huntsman re: health insurance should be delayed until someone thinks things through.
The gays are not going to elect you to anything in this state, and now the family people aren't either.
The LDS Church's recent statement that gay activists have taken grossly out of context does not, repeat DOES NOT, endorse civil unions at all. It only says that the Church "does not object to rights (already established in California) regarding hospitalization and medical care, fair housing and employment rights, or probate rights . . . "
That allows for some basic human decency that ALL people, regardless of sexual gender preference, deserve. But gay activists need to be very careful, since saying that someone shouldn't be fired for simply being gay is a far cry from an employer firing someone for openly espousing a deeply dangerous and high-risk sexual practice at work.
And Governor Huntsman needs to be very, very careful in how he fulfills his obvious political ambitions.
All people have the exact same rights & restrictions when it comes to marriage. There is no reason to change that to accomodate the wishes of homosexuals. This is just another example of malcontented extremists demanding special rights. If we allow homosexual marriage, how long before extremists start demanding incestuous marriage? Plural marriage? Marriage to children? Marriage to farm animals? It never ends.....
By the way, I am not LDS or Republican. Just a man who understands that marriage (traditional) is the cornerstone of civilization and any attempt to weaken marriage as it has existed for thousands of years will inevitably lead to the collapse of civilization.
I thought we were living in the land of the free and the home of the brave. It seems that many Utahans believe that "The Church" is the only authority.
Of all the things said about Buttars, your statement makes the least sense to me. Shifting principles? Chris Buttars? He has remained remarkably consistent in his opposition of Gay marriage and civil unions amoung same-sex couples. You may not appreciate his stance on things but to call him someone who shifts his position is either very mis-informed or delusional.
Contrasting Huntsman with Buttars on the idea of consistancy? Buttars has never bowed to political interests to gain a more popular opinion. This is evidenced by his very narrow win (4% margin) in a district that votes consistantly 70% republican.
While Huntsman does enjoy incredible popularity, I would not call him a bastion of principled consistancy. (When first running for office he voiced his support for admendment 3)
To further this marketing strategy, Elder L. Whitney Clayton said, in general, the church "does not oppose civil unions or domestic partnerships," that involve benefits like health insurance and property rights.
This statement was seen for what it was, a way to improve the standing of the church in the court of public opinion. This has been confirmed by the silence of the church regarding the Common Ground initiatives. In fact, the silence coming from Temple Square regarding benefits like health insurance and property rights has been deafening.
And before you start slamming me as a 'mormon-hater' - realize that I am LDS and just want my church to stand by what they have said - no more, no less.
Civil Unions could keep people OFF of Medicaid, OFF of Food Stamps, and out of the emergency rooms. HELLO, how is that a bad thing?
Florida recently allowed individuals to add family/significant others to health care plans if they were living in the same household. THIS IS A GOOD THING!
I Salute Gov Huntsman, and I condemn those who are opposed to positive change. Teach your children your values, dont force them on others.
Utah is a hard enough state to live in with LDS values pushed on everyone. And for the most part, they are good moral values, but it is NOT your RIGHT to enforce YOUR VALUES on OTHERS who do not share your religion. Religion has NO place in Government. And Government has NO PLACE in the peoples bedrooms!
LAND OF THE FREE & HOME OF THE BRAVE ~AND~ SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE!!!
You son or Daughter
Now what are you protesting about?
We all can discuss these issues without resorting to name calling or worse.
For those seemingly full of hate (or religious fervor, whatever you want to call it), just remember: WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?
I am an active LDS, conservative Utahn who supports him all the way. By the way (pardon the pun), I am a young, straight, married, family man.
"marriage (traditional) is the cornerstone of civilization and any attempt to weaken marriage as it has existed for thousands of years will inevitably lead to the collapse of civilization."
Thank you for saying it so simply.
Actually, it does matter to me. I hold certain opinions and values, and as a citizen I have a right to let them be heard. Furthermore, regarding your supposed separation of church and state comment, I'll let Neal Maxwell answer you:
"If people are not permitted to advocate, to assert, and to bring to bear, in every legitimate way, the opinions and views they hold that grow out of their religious convictions, what manner of men and women would they be, anyway? Our founding fathers did not wish to have a state church established nor to have a particular religion favored by government. They wanted religion to be free to make its own way. But neither did they intend to have irreligion made into a favored state church. Notice the terrible irony if this trend were to continue. When the secular church goes after its heretics, where are the sanctuaries? To what landfalls and Plymouth Rocks can future pilgrims go?"
From Neal Maxwell's "Meeting the Challenges of Today" given in 1978.
The Senate leader said Huntsman wasn't referring to civil unions as an alternative to marriage for gay couples but as a way for non-traditional couples to share benefits. The governor had tried and failed in 2005 to push through a Senate bill advocating reciprocal benefits for non-traditional couples.
If you believe "Traditional Marriage" has existed in it's current state for "thousands of years" you really haven't studied history. The current state of marriage didn't appear until the mid- to late-1700's. What about all of the prophets in the bible with multiple wives and concubines?
You tell me to "teach my children my values", but "don't push them on you"?
Then you "condemn" me for having values?!?
"Utah is a hard enough state to live in with LDS values pushed on everyone"?
I'm a non-LDS resident of this state. I have nothing but respect for the people who chose to reside here. I moved here from California like many others who were tired of the politics and poor values.
I feel neither threatened or abused by anyone else' value system.
I sounds to me like YOU are the the one with the problem.
Why is it that when someone has a different opinion and shares it, they are considered anti-gay or homophobic?
Land of the free (as long as I agree with YOU) Right?!?!?!?!?!
Remember, apathy preceeds acceptance.
I don't think I will be able to support him in the future.
His courageous leadership will be beneficial to his church and to our state.
It will encourage others who have been quietly supportive of equality for gays to 'come out of the closet,' and it will encourage everyone to re-evaluate their own biases and prejudices.
This is a great day for all families, as all family trees have gay branches.
I thought I had helped re-elect a conservative leader, whose party shares pretty much the same values I do--guess I was wrong.
Gayle Ruzicka and Eagle forum are nothing but a modern day group of Pharisee. They claimed to be of the covenant, the righteous, defending the faith, but they stoned people to death, and if I get the story right, were the ones who crucified their own Savior, because they thought that he wasn't following all their rules.
We are not a religious state, the constitution ensures that. Having served in the military and being deployed to a religious state like Iraq, Pakistan and others. I am glad we don't live under that fear of the religious police enforcing the rules of the Koran.
The truth is however, we are on our way to making it as such. Eagle Forum will probably soon lobby themselves the ability to enforce the rule of the Book of Mormon and Bible on all those in the state. We need to stop and remember one thing the constitution guarantees "Equal Representation under the law"
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Mom convicted in child's death 2:32 p.m.
- Layton home cleared of deadly gas 2:23 p.m.
- White House mocks Sarah Palin 2:21 p.m.
- Court halts rules on Edwards sex tape 2:11 p.m.
- Cribs recalled after 3 deaths 2:02 p.m.
- Kerrigan's family disputes autopsy 1:54 p.m.
- Birth defect rate normal in CA town 1:52 p.m.
- Blog: SUU going backward in Summit... 1:25 p.m.
- Lil Wayne sentencing postponed 1:22 p.m.
- Blog: Flagging heads 1:12 p.m.
- Utah Jazz Ironmen
- High school players commit to BYU
- LDS veggie program helps Bolivians
- Lawmakers, educators debate plan
- Utahn's 'Caveman Diet' catching on
- MWC race shaping 'Survivor' style
- Kaman, not Boozer, on All-Star team
- 2nd Layton girl hospitalized from gas
- SLC's City Creek moves ahead
- Cougars hope for fast rebound
- UNLV bombs BYU into loss
185 - Lawmakers, educators debate plan
158 - Why do they hate us? Try asking
140 - Countering attacks on LDS scholarship
131 - Letters: Tea Party hypocrites
116 - Rally in opposition to benefit cuts
90 - Utah football alters schedule
80 - BYU's prime postseason position?
77 - Let's talk college hoops
76 - Korver wants some playing time
74
Interesting and entertaining observations of the Utah Legislature.
Seriously? This is the sort of partisan banter that detracts from the whole...
Typical yewt fan, living in the past.
Just another thought: BYU has played in 4 bowl games that have been the host...
Treat him as you would want to be treated...He will pay his fine. He needs...
Coaches draft good players and cut poor performers. Stock brokers pick the...
The Deseret News does report FG and FT attempts and made. Bingham has...
Really hoho boy? You forgot to pretend to be denz, three11stu, and fedor....
so was this another accident or intent to damage
so was this amother accident or intent to damage
I'm still in favor of trading Boozer. He is performing well because he has...




