Reader comments
Clinton's hearing is smooth sailing
14 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- List of Grammy winners in select...
- Bon Iver wins best new artist Grammy
- Foo Fighters and Adele winning big at...
- Adele wins song of the year Grammy...
- Zac Posen at Fashion Week looks to...
- Carnival goes to the dogs with Rio...
- Investigators seek answers to...
- Grammys honor Houston, celebrate...
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring...
- Zac Posen at Fashion Week looks to...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Whitney Houston, superstar of...
- Romney adds to delegate lead with...
- White House didn't foresee birth...
- View live stream of services for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney edges Santorum in...
- Romney may be in danger in Michigan...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
93 - Obama revamps birth control policy
80 - Santorum sweeps caucuses
48 - Obama to change birth control policy
28 - Romney in trouble in Mich., beyond?
25 - Obama attempts to calm the waters
23 - Boehner: Congress to overturn birth...
21 - Maine: Romney wins caucuses
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18 - Birth control backlash unexpected
18







You need to learn the truth. You where feed lies by the neoconservative propaganda machine. We are prohibited from putting links here. Google the "Arkansas Project." You will hear there was a systematic use of lies. These lies have been disproved.
"According to R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr., editor in chief of the Spectator, the idea for investigating the Clintons was born on a fishing trip on the Chesapeake Bay in the fall of 1993. David Brock, who reported many of the Clinton scandals, described himself as a Republican "hitman" who "soon became a lead figure in the drive to" get Clinton. Writing for the American Spectator, he brought the stories of alleged sexual misbehavior by Bill and Hillary Clinton into the public notice in late 1993.[3] The Pacific Research Institute funded further attempts to discredit the Clintons. The "Arkansas Project" name that later became famous was conceived as a joke; the actual name within the Spectator and between the Spectator and Scaife foundations was the "Editorial Improvement Project."
Oh really? Was it a lie that Bill Clinton exposed himself to Paula Jones? That he cheated on his wife with an intern and multiple other women? That he lied about it under oath?
Sorry. The Clintons will do and say anything to get what they want. That includes murder. Brock found a way to make some extra money. Big deal. One writer. A majority of what the Clintons are accused of cannot be discredited.
As American she makes me feel proud of what she has accomplished. She is one among many who will help us to recover the dignity we lost as a nation.
I would like to invite all LDS in conservative Utah to put aside their misstrust and pray for the new president and his cabinet, to have the wisdom, courage and objectivity to do what is right for our country and the world.
All they are trying to do is to make it so that it appears as if they have done something, when actually they have not.
The narrative about Hillary's answers make is sound like she never really answered the questions, but is slick enough to either deflect the question or to use up the questioner's time to prevent actual questions from being asked.
that is a tremendous conflict of intrest.