Reader comments
The winners and the losers
1 comment | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- John B. Quigley: American forces do...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- In our opinion: Tinkering with...
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Readers' forum: Voting for principals
- Readers' forum: Bush's failed policies
- John Florez: The changing face of...
- The winners and the losers
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Home equity loans
In Opinion
Across Site
- Obama's assault on the poor
62 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?53
- Letters: Bush's failed policies49
- Letters: Teachers not overpaid30
- Letters: Home equity loans28
- Economic chaos ahead25
- GOP no longer leads on defense24
- Letters: Rights of conscience22
- Letter: Taxing our children21
- Letter: Require drug tests19
This argument makes no sense to me. Retailers price their inventory based on what they paid for it generally. Then when you re-supply you charge according to cost of that shipment. Am I missing something?