Reader comments
Polygamist leader calls Canadian prosecution 'persecution'

ONLY TWO ???
lol
Blackmore, 52, is accused of having 20 wives while Oler, 44, has only two, prosecutors said.

I have always wondered what is the difference of the FLDS practicing polygamy and inner city "Boyz in the Hood" or a Hollywood celebrity having multiple mistresses, households, children with more than one woman other than church sanction. Jessy Jackson was John Edwards were both supporting multiple families. Why is this not subject to the same scrutiny. If there is child molestation that should be prosecuted at the full extent of the law. I am not Mormon, or Christian it just seems that this is not equal protection under the law (14th amendment to the Constitution I think) and is religious persecution since the only difference is church sanction. I also do not favor any behavior other than monogamy it is just my observation that this is not fair since polygamy is rampant in the secular society not just in the FLDS.

Disturbing and disgusting people.

it's unclear to me what these people don't understand. If they would stop isolating their followers and allow for free will, polygamy wouldn't be an issue. When the daughters can see their neighbors going out on dates, falling in love, and choosing a peer as a husband - then they will balk at being forced to marry some old man chosen for them.

The ONLY reason these girls accept the forced marriages is because that is all they know.

Free the people and let them make their own decisions. It's obvious that the leaders of this cult are afraid that they will lose followers if the people get to see the real world.

"THIS IS TO TEST CANADIAN LAWS AGAINST POLYGAMY?

NOT LIKE THE "CATHOLIC CHURCH CLOAKING ITSELF WITH SECULARISM TO DEFEND THEIR SECULAR INTERESTS,"


"ULTRA-RELIGIOUS GROUPS," LIKE IN THE PAST 2000 YEARS IN CONTEMPT, ARE STILL (A) TEMPTING THE ULTRA-SECULAR LAW OR (B) TESTING THE ULTRA-SECULAR LAW AS:

..."The Utah-based pro-polygamy group Principle Voices... to supporters, Principle Voices director Mary Batchelor said it was "to test the Canadian laws against polygamy."

Source Deseret News



AHEAD OF THIS CASE, CANADA [ULTRA-SECULAR GOVERMENT] HAD: (A) MOCK TRIALS AND (B) MOOT COURT APPEALS




ON THE OTHER HAND, POLYGAMIST DID NOT TEST THEIR BIGAMY/POLYGAMY CASES IN:

(1) MOOT COURTS AND
(2) MOCK TRIALS

NOTICE OF OTHER CREDITS AND ATTRIBUTIONS TO DEBATER AS PREVIOUSLY STATED AS FACTS AND FICTION, QUASI-FACT AND QUASI-FICTION, AND RESERCH, IN PREVIOUS CLAIMERS AND DISCLAIMERS.

re - Cedar City:

The difference, which should be obvious, is that the examples you give are people that have the ability to make choices, and exist in the real world. They can see the choices available, and make informed decisions based on those observations.

The FLDS isolate their followers, and the young girls know of no other way. They truly believe that their "prophet" has had a revelation, or discussion with God, stating that they are to marry whoever is chosen for them.

If God wanted them to marry a certain person, then God would come down and tell them so. Otherwise, they should be allowed free will to decide what is best for them

So if the FLDS moved into regular neighborhoods and practiced polygamy, no one would care. It's the isolation and extreme indoctrination from birth that is the real issue.

It's actually fairly naive to compare multiple baby-daddys or Hefner or Hollywood to the FLDS lifestyle. The FLDS has no free will because they haven't been exposed to any other environment, and have no idea how to make informed decisions. (You must have information to make informed decisions, and they have none.)

If this is religious persecution, this chasing these perverts to the ends of the earth, then persecute away.

If they would have castrated the bast@rd that started polygamy in America, much evil would have been prevented.

FAILED POLYGAMIST/PRINCIPAL VOICES TEST CASE: (REPORTED ON THE INTERNET AND NEWSPAPER ARCHIVES)

INDEPENDENT POLYGAMIST-WANNABE: G. LEE COOK LOST HIS TEST CASE IN U.S. FEDERAL TRIAL AND APPEAL COURTS.

LIST OF CASE FALLACIES NOT REPORTED: ...the ACLU filed suit on behalf of G. Lee Cook...

POLYGAMIST FAILED LAST TEST CASE IN U.S. FEDERAL CASE (200X)

Available at:

Source Internet

The problem with charging them with Polygamy is that they are technically only married to one person. The fact that they live with multiple partners and believe that they are spiritually married is not a fact of law. It makes prosecuting them very difficult unless you prosecute everyone who is married and fornicates with someone he/she is not married to.
That is why Utah and other states has elected to only prosecute the child molestation aspect. If two (or more) adults are doing it...there is not much you can do. when they bring underage children into spiritual marriages, they should go in with all the power the law can muster.

Re: Anonymous- RIGHT ON MY FRIEND!

I am not lds but my ancesteres were mormon pioneers that followed Brigham Young into the utah valley. I am proud of my heritage, and often wonder why so many lds come on here and blast polygamy with such scorn. All religious rhetoric aside, why shouldn't polygamy between consenting adults be leagalized in the US and Canada where freedom of religion is charrished. If the marriages were legal, the women could not file for welfare as single mothers as they do today. This would save us all money. I can only think of a few reasons why mormons hate polygamy so much.

1. they are tired of there non lds peers making constant polygamy jokes.
2. It tarnishes the squeeky clean images they have for their first two profits.
3. They are afraid that legalized polygamy would temp their church to eventually reinstate their formerly sacred practice.

Please stop treating your neibors with the same persicution the govt showed your ancestors.

It is apparent that religious intolerance is based upon civil viewpoints,i.e. the government. Whenever a civil or nonreligious entity like a government moves upon a subject like polygamy, their viewpoint is politically-based. If the government were theocratic, then it is one religion persecuting another over polygamy. Islam practices plural marriage, so a Muslim who has more than one wife is not welcome to live with his wives in North America. A case of a government overruling an Islamic tenet.

�� marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with them, then only one.� (Quran 4:3)(Muhammad was born about 570 A.D., long before Columbus came to the Americas.)

Polygamy is not for everyone, much less a single-spouse marriage. Since the U.S. has a 50 percent divorce rate for conventional marriages, polygamy is likely no picnic if there is dissension in the marriages. Therefore, no one should take up polygamy unless they are confident that they could sustain a conventional marriage. If someone could beautify a marriage to one spouse, perhaps such a person could beautify a polygamous marriage. Otherwise, remain single.

DIGNITY, SELF-WORTH, knowledge of what INSEST and child sexual assault means are, all, concepts that WOMEN growing in POLYGAMY never learn. These women learn to open their legs to men who claim are their GODS you can only IMAGINE how SICK these women become, in order to believe their men can take them to heaven.
This is WHY the government has an obligation to act and impose CANADIAN LAWS.
Those sick men are nothing but sexual perverts.

"LAS Larry | 6:30 p.m. Jan. 8, 2009
The problem with charging them with Polygamy is that they are technically only married to one person".

Nope Larry, in Saskatchewan they would be the spouses of all. Section 51 of the Saskatchewan Family Act guarantees multiple spouses are legal.