Reader comments
Yet another year with a bogus BCS
30 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Sports edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Sports
Across Site
- Woods goes from inevitable to...
- McBride joins Utah Blaze staff
- Bama's Grant: Releford, Steele to...
- Bengals hire Mark Carrier as...
- Zambia team returns home after...
- Struggling Wolves fire manager McCarthy
- Cavs' Irving nearing comeback from...
- Sandusky pleased by grandkid visits,...
- Olympus High wrestler looks to win...
- BYU baseball starts season Friday
In Sports
Across Site
- Mike Sorensen: Coaches now getting...
- Brad Rock: Whit's Guys: When it comes...
- BYU basketball: Cougars rout Waves by...
- Utah Jazz stop three-game skid with...
- Utah Jazz take a moment for team...
- Vai's View: Vai's View: The power of...
- High school wrestling: 3A elite take...
- High school boys basketball: American...
- Mickelson crushes Tiger and wins...
- Dick Harmon: How tenuous is BYU's...
In Sports
Across Site
- California beats UCLA 73-63 to notch...
126 - UVU gets win over Chicago State
98 - BYU, Big 12 rumors still percolating
46 - Cougars handling rotating roster
26 - No. 4 Missouri drop 3-pointers, No. 6...
24 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - U.'s Whit hires people he knows
21 - Jazz blown out by Thunder, 101-87
21 - African Cup final coaches reflect...
18 - BYU routs Pepperdine, 86-48
17












Does anyone know what the approximate breakdown is between BCS and non-BCS writers?
Team vs top 25 vs top 10 overall
A 4-0 2-0 13-0
B 6-1 2-1 13-1
C 4-1 2-0 13-1
D 3-1 0-0 12-1
E 4-1 1-0 12-1
Without looking at the names or legacies of teams A thru E, most people would choose team A as National Champion, with a few votes for team B. Of course, A=Utah, B=Oklahoma (assuming win over Florida), C=Florida (assuming win over Oklahoma), D=USC, E=Texas. Also, it's ironic that all these 1 loss teams are saying "nobody could beat us", when in fact someone has. Florida fans criticize Utah 3 point wins vs TCU and NM, somehow implying that a 3 point win is not as impressive as a 1 point loss (to Ole Miss).
What if all the non-BCS school coaches agreed to vote Utah #1 in the final poll and vote the winner of the "BCS Championship" #3 or 4?
There are slightly more BCS schools in FBS than non-BCS, so it wouldn't be enough to just vote Utah #1.
The Utes will get plenty of #2 votes, as will Texas and USC. Therefore, a #3 vote is needed for the OK-FL winner to propel Utah to #1 in the coaches' poll.
It's fun to think about.
In reality, it would be a nice gesture for 4-5 coaches to break rank and vote for the Utes. I don't know if there would be repercussions or not.
I went to the game in NO. It was everything you wanted as a fan. Nick Saban was out of his skin all night. Our 15k fans choked their 58k fans. All I can say is I'm proud to be a Ute!
...geez how long ago was last friday? Remeber all the Alabama coaches, players, fans and the national media thought the same as you do. Where are they now. crying and complaining. Which is where you would be after the Utes creams you off your high horse.
OK-States schedule wasn't at all impressive - Washington St, Missouri St and Troy ? come on ... yes you played some tough games... so does all the top teams. grow up and quit whinning.
see contender comparision above.
I�m all for Shurtleff, or anyone else, annoying the BSC. I wish more big time coaches (i.e. Urban) and other university types would have the guts to stand up to them. Unfortunately, BCS pockets are deeper than the rest of the world, and unless enough people somehow reject them, they will never change. All those big bowls, TV contracts, etc. make it real easy to ignore the rest of the world. Oh, wait a second. We just sent a bunch of crazed Ute fans to New Orleans to help line their pockets even more with our hard earned �mid major� dollars. I admit it would have been difficult, but maybe we should have started a trend and ignored them by refusing their Sugar Bowl bid.
In basketball, a 10-member selection carefully evaluates every team, meeting weekly to discuss and compare notes, and even encouraging committee members to go out a watch teams in person.
In the BCS, nameless computers, with biased formulas that favor the BCS conference teams, spit out names of contenders.
In basketball, RPI is calculated for every team, but the selection committee only uses RPI as one factor.
In the BCS, two beauty contest winners are picked by adding A + B + C, with no human intervention to consider whether the selections make any sense.
In basketball, all factors are carefully considered by real people before choosing and seeding teams.
In the BCS, half the teams are eliminated from National Championship consideration before the first kickoff and there is seldom a clear-cut, undisputed National Champion.
In basketball, EVERY team has an equal opportunity to win the National Championship and there is rarely if ever a dispute about the clear-cut National Champion.
And still the BCS exists!
WHY???
Pittsburgh 1984 (3-7-1), even though the Panthers were ranked #3 when BYU played them at the start of the season, cannot be considered a ranked opponent by any reasonable fan.
Michigan 2008 (3-9), even though the Wolverines were ranked #24 in ONE poll at the start of the season, cannot be considered a ranked opponent by any reasonable fan.
BYU fans can legitimately say that the Cougars beat #1-ranked Miami because Miami was the defending National Champion and finished the season 10-2 and ranked #3.