Reader comments
Man kills 2 roaming pit bulls in Magna
88 comments | Read story
Let�s wait for animal control to get there after the people were attacked. By then the dogs would hurt the people and maybe back at the owners place and animal control would do nothing about the dogs. Its happened in my neighborhood a few times. A dog jumped the owners fence attacked a few people including kids and then went back to the owners yard and animal control said they could do nothing.
You or your kids obviously never have been attacked or came close to being attacked by a dog before.
Pit bulls should be outlawed in our community!
Please don't judge animals by the breed. It isn't fair. If you ban certain animals because of their breed, you are miss judging all of them. Take care of the aggressive dogs as you see a real threat. I also have a Min Pin that is meaner that snot. I am afraid of her more than I ever was of any other dog. It is the little dogs that are the mean ones that will chase you and bite you for nothing. Don't descriminate against Rottweilers and Pit Bulls just because of what they are. That is the same as judging people by their race and nobody likes that.
This guy should be charged with killing someone else's pets. He admits to having gone out looking for the owner, finding the two dogs again, and then proceeding to shoot them. On the news last night, they reported that one dog was shot point blank. How did he get so close if these dogs were such a threat?
My friend (who has previously owned a pit bull) and I both agreed that there was something fishy about the story. Was there any history of aggressiveness by these dogs? I mean, aside from "perceived threat" which is about as useless a cop-out as any excuse I've heard.
It sounds like this man went on the hunt for these two dogs with the sole purpose of shooting them.
If these dogs were a threat then be a man and call animal control while keeping an eye on the dogs. I'm sure he thinks he is a real tough guy shooting a dog point blank.
I also agree the owners of the dogs should be charged with something also. They are bad owners if this happens regularly.
I feel this gentleman was in the right if he truly did feel that the family was threatened by the dogs. And it is evident by the other witnesses that there was a threat. However Animal Control should have been called. If you can remember to grab your pistol, then you can remember your cell phone.
The dogs' owner was charged with four counts (two for each dog). I can't remember the charges. They actually had footage of the guy receiving his dogs' bodies. It was sad.
I don't disagree that people should be able to protect themselves from harm, but this particular incident just sounds suspicious. Although I will admit that I would have a very hard time shooting an animal. I've been confronted by animals which I felt were threatening, but no harm came to me. I guess knowing how to handle myself around unfamiliar dogs definitely helps.
Try calling animal control - you'll wait hours, and if its a holiday, they'll probably wait until the next day.
The neighbor was completely correct in doing away with the NUISANCE.
BTW: ever wonder how much we pay in taxes to help people take care of their "pets".
Sorry to hear that. I will admit that pit bulls are probably more inclined to violence, as an evolutionary result of their breeding. And because they are stronger creatures than most other dogs, they do have a stigma attached because they can cause more harm from a simple bite than a golden retriever could.
It is a tough one to argue -- many people choose guns to protect their homes, some others use pit bulls. It's a good thing to think about, and brings up a whole new variety of issues.
The owner was charged, but until they prove these dogs were hostile (and not simply a perceived threat), I won't simply give a pass to the man who shot the dogs.
I don't know. How much do I pay in taxes to help take care of your children?
We must keep our dogs in constant control.... or loose the privelege of having them.
If 1 man had obeyed the rules he'd still have his dogs. If the other man had, well... we will never know what could have actually happened.
Also though... the gun owner really should have called animal control first thing and then followed instinct.
You either like dogs
or
you don't.
I don't....so its good that he killed the dogs. keep your stupid dogs in your yards or on a leash for crying out loud. Oh and by the way, your neighbors don't think its cute when your dogs bark all the time.
Aggressive dogs- 0
Good guys won this one. End of story.
Glad the guy with a legal gun was able to fix this problem BEFORE some kids got scarred for life by a vicious dog attack.
Because I know people and I know dogs. One of them can be vicious and cruel and violent, and the other drinks water from toilet bowls. I'm sure he did have his gun in his car with him. But that doesn't mean he didn't go out on the hunt for them -- he knew he had his gun in the car already. Maybe he went inside to get his gun and realized it was in his car.
If it was self-defense, fine. But he should still be cited for discharging a weapon in a residential neighborhood. The "family" being threatened was getting into their car. They could have gotten inside the car and locked the doors. Instead, this guy shows up, acts heroic and shoots the two dogs? One point blank to the head?
Something suspicious here, that's for sure.
Of course, yes, the owner caused the deaths of his dogs by being a bad dog owner. As an owner of a dog, I care enough about my dogs to keep them safe. If they get out, they might get hit by a car. They might get in a fight with another animal. Ignorance is no excuse for not caring for your pet.
This man who shot the dogs, well, we don't really know if he was a vigilante or a concerned neighbor. Why not assume the better?
3rd for you animal lovers that can't tell the difference between a pit bull and a poodle look up their tendencies towards violent behavior. Pits and others like them need to be put down because they are violent!!! Don't get me wrong I love animals but this breed is dangerous and I would have done the same thing!
Also, how long EACH Gentleman has lived in the effected neiborhood?
And how long the other fellow has owned his (no longer threatening) bulldogs?
Just how long has DANGER been "at large"?
The dogs bark all day and night and I still have to pick up the stuff off my lawn. When will people have rights again? Better yet, when will the police stick up for regular people who want to go on a family walk without being threatened by dogs? They finally did this time! What a nice change!
Fines to owners with roaming dogs should be increased to $1,000. That should help owners understand that kids have more rights to play outside than their dog has rights to scare off my kids.
I wouldn't care too much even if he had deliberately set out to shoot them. Dogs running loose and attacking people shouldn't be given a second chance; a .40 caliber slug to the head is all they deserve.
Two agressive dogs dead, irresponsible owner cited by the cops, shooter walks free. I'm not seeing a problem here. Win-Win-Win.
Owners need to be responisble, otherwise people AND the dogs suffer.
My friend who owned a pitbull wasn't a "gangsta" or "nuts" ... SHE works full-time and had the dog for protection at home. The only incident which occurred with the dog involved a neighborhood child who got pushed down because the dog jumped up on her to lick her face. Aside from that, nothing. Even the supposed postal workers who feared dogs would pet her.
And this is why a family of Muslims is kicked off an airplane and not allowed to reboard. Fear makes fools of irrational people.
Would have felt better about the dogs being put down if they had injured somebody or killed someone's pet first?
What would it take for you to see the use of a weapon as a good thing in defense of another person?
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- No fractures on Emery's foot 10:07 a.m.
- Reports: Modest but steady growth 10:02 a.m.
- Stocks hold gains after econ reports 9:59 a.m.
- Ontario Mormons' nativity scenes 9:41 a.m.
- Rabbis join NJ gay marriage debate 9:03 a.m.
- Afghan buildup on faster timetable 9:01 a.m.
- Salahi denies crashing W.H. party 8:58 a.m.
- Suspect in police slayings killed 8:55 a.m.
- Arrests made in Roy slayings 8:35 a.m.
- Bowden meeting with school officials 8:01 a.m.
- Hall reprimanded by MWC
- Utes won't respond to Hall
- Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal
- 2 citations issued at Y.-U. game
- Mitchell called intelligent, controlling
- Cougs begin bowl preparations
- Y. student vanished in China
- Max Hall issues apology
- Daughter: Mitchell fed me my pet
- BYU says Hall incident resolved
- Hall mouths off about hate of Utah
900 - Cougars beat Utes in overtime
481 - Hall reprimanded by MWC
387 - Max Hall issues apology
383 - Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal
322 - Utes won't respond to Hall
264 - BYU is champion of the state
140 - Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies
123 - Cave to be sealed with body inside
120 - BYU says Hall incident resolved
119
My husband was teaching his 6th-grade class in Salt Lake last year when...
I wanted to tell them not to go. I dropped subtle hints. "My money is on...
As it was for President Bush as well.
Way to go! Being an insulin dependent diabetic is no small task. This boy...
Very well said. Also, our elected officials need to give patriotic duty to...
. . . since it's the situs of a case in which the Attorney General's...
I hope for a quick recovery to this great competitor.
Let's build a monorail!
Max Hall is the 'winningest' QB in BYU history. OR Max Hall is the...
With the emergence of Fes out of the D League it is looking more and more...
Emery is the best player on the floor. He will be missed, but I think they...
There are believers and there are seekers. The believers just want everyone...

