Anonymous | 4:03 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
I'd like to see the gay community in California gather enough signatures to put their own proposition on the ballot--perhaps something that invalidates weddings conducted in mormon temples. Will it pass? Of course not, but it's only fair that the other side's rights should be subject to a vote as well.

I wonder if mormons would act with serene civility if that were to happen...
Richard G. | 4:04 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
The Mormon church has stepped waaaaayyy over the line by actively spurring its members to convert religious belief into civil law.

Yes, Mormons have the right to vote and express their opinion, but that doesn't mean what they do with that right is the right thing. In this case, they have abused their rights to strip fellow human beings of human rights.

In my book, that is a hate crime.

The Mormon church will reap what it has sowed, namely, hatred.



Pitiful | 4:09 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Can't win in the ballot box, then go to the streets claiming the other side is discriminatory. Pretty sad. Go ahead and protest and you'll see the sleeping giant of conservatism arise. Yes, liberals carry the day currently in the House, Senate and White House, but guaranteed if a true conservative comes forward in 2012, with the past 4 years having ridiculous lawsuits against constitutionally passed ammendments, or if courts continue to rule without legislation (see Connecticut), the sleeping giant of conservatism will arise to claim power once again. Nothing upsets the populace more than courts overturning legislation, and petty protests denying freedom of speech for those who disagree with you. The only ones spewing hatred right now are the protestors in favor of gay marriage against religion. Nothing in the Mormon or Catholic stance tolerated hatred for the other side, contrary to those protesting them now.
Comments continue below
Henry Drummond | 4:11 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
It appears that the Church's prominent role in defeating marriage rights for homosexuals is backfiring. I don't think I have ever seen the Gay Rights movement more united and the Church has set itself up as the uniting force.

In the end the Mormons will cause everything they have been trying to avoid. They have sown the wind, and are reaping the whirlwind.
Calm Down | 4:12 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
If pro-gay marriage supporters truly feel their cause is just and reasonable, they should stop the protests and create a proposition to support their position. Then spend the next year or two defending and promoting the position. Let the people vote again. This was not the last election where such decisions can be made. Let the democratic process function. Mob rule is not the answer.
nostradomis | 4:19 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Gettysburg Address:.....government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. Democracy itself defined by President Lincoln, democracy in California has spoken Prop 8, deal with it.
porky | 4:20 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Unless these marchers also take their cause up to the Cathedral of the Madeline, then they too are just as bigoted as they claim LDS are.

too bad they don't realize their attacks on Utah is hurting their cause more than helping it.
ANNOYING! | 4:21 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
This really has gotten past the point of ANNOYING!

Not only are you closing major streets down, but the commuter's on these streets are ANNOYED with all of you! (even those who voted no on 8), AND the fact that this is "after-the-fact."

The voice of the people spoke LOUD AND CLEAR in ALL 3 STATES! Give it a rest. Mask's are off and everyone really see's who you are. And it's not pretty. It's ANNOYING! Just like it would be if I were to stand outside the front of the white house with my McCain sign throwing a 3-year old temper tantrum, because Obama is now the president.
A N N O Y I N G!
New Yorker | 4:21 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
They are right. A sleeping giant is being awakened. That is the 98% heterosexual community. We are seeing what bigots some of these glbt really are. Keep pushing and you'll get much more than you want. Be happy with civil unions and continue to play house. Fortunately, reproduction will continue to keep your numbers at 2%. You have ruined the word gay and the sign of the rainbow. There was all of 75 protesters here in NYC out of 8 million people. Now that is gigantic!
john | 4:25 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Let the gays get married and be miserable like the rest of us.
Yay! | 4:25 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Go gays! Gay marriage will be a reality. If not today then tomorrow or in 10 years!
Snippy | 4:30 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Don�t H8 democracy.
Democracy | 4:33 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Sandra Rodrigues, like many Americans do not understand our government. Many people argue the point that the state Supreme Court should have listened to the "will of the people" when it made its decision allowing gay marriage to be legal.

One thing this proves is that much of the citizenry is ill informed about the purpose of the judicial system. One of the reasons it was made a separate branch was to specifically insulate it from the whims of the electorate. It is not, and never has been, the job of justices to base their decisions upon what a majority of the people want. It is their job to protect the minority from the will of the majority when the majority favors abrogating the constitutional rights of the minority.

Everyone is free to disagree with the arguments that their decisions are based upon - but, please don't try to make the point that they should be paying attention to how the people vote on an issue.
B. Heath | 4:33 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
It's so ironic that this Rodriguez woman would ask that people respect democracy and the will of the voters. Are civil rights subject to the whim of the voting public? Could this same public theoretically vote to take away rights from other groups, reinstate segregation and slavery? NO! Civil rights do not exist at the pleasure of a voting majority. They are inherent to all people and immune to prejudice and ignorance. I don't think a lot of people understand what it means to have your very identity brought before the public as a ballot proposition, how insulting and dehumanizing it is to be publicly legislated against as a person. These same people will sit and wonder why we are lashing out in frustration and sadness at being relegated to a second class status. All I can say is, this is going to get a lot worse and, if the civil rights struggles of the 1960's are any indication, we are in for a lot of social upheaval as gay Americans stand up and say: "No more! We deserve the same rights that you enjoy and we will fight to the death to protect them!"
SanDiegoD | 4:34 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
"They are persecuting our church and other people in California, but they need to get a life and honor democracy," said Sandra Rodrigues, of Cottonwood Heights.

Majority is not always correct - Amendments 13 & 15, Brown vs. Topeka Board of Education, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Loving vs. Virginia - US history is filled with a steady progression of minority civil rights being gained despite the bigoted views of the majority.

You came into a state that is not yours, and poured millions of dollars into stripping the civil rights away from a minority group on a ballot issue that was not in your state and therefore was none of your business. Who exactly needs to get a life, here?
Harry Kuheim | 4:36 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
I see the Gay community only respects a vote in a Democratic election that goes their way.Just as Obama supporters are crowing about how wonderful democracy is when and only when their guy wins.Heaven forbid that McCain would of won the election,this would have been another miscarrage of Democracy.
Jeremy Cruz | 4:38 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Why are LGBT's focusing completely on the LDS Church? The Church State Council of the Seventh-day Adventist Church (in Westlake Village, CA) also backed the proposition 8 proposal.

All of this demonstrating looks anti-Mormon and not pro-LGBT. They are singling out a single minority to express there discouragement against. Sound even slightly familiar?
Kathy | 4:39 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
I am totally disgusted by the behavior of the GLBT by singling out the Mormon Churches. They are hurting their cause by doing this. The vote should count and the people have spoken. The GLBT think that they can walk over everyone else to get their way. What will be next? I have seen some very hateful behavior by them and they call everyone else a bigot.
Yawn | 4:41 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Wa Wa. I hope all you people can find something constructive to do. I don't think you'll be able to keep up the protests forever. Like was said before, get it on the ballot again in the next election. Maybe you'll win. And luckily, Mormons will continue to fight it no matter what because God never changes and we don't either. The United States will likely continue down the same path it has been, destroying itself from inside. It's been prophesied; it's not news to us. But it is still our responsibility to fight against it. And in the end, you'll see who's right.
Sarah | 4:42 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
NEW YORKER: AMEN AMEN AMEN
Gettysburg? | 4:42 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Interesting choice of address. You should have picked a time and place where the president wasn't speaking in the context of protecting the rights of an oppressed minority against the will of half the country's population. State-sanctioned bigotry is never right, no matter how many people approve of it. Most of those who support it now will pretend like they didn't when mainstream culture finally turns in favor of life and liberty and justice for all.
Re: Richard G | 4:43 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Hatred? It seems like everywhere I looked, it's the gay and lesbian community who is showing hatred here. They are loud and boisterous and trying to shove their lifestyle in people's faces. It's not a political issue, it is a moral issue and the religious community has every right to express it's view and doing it in a civilize and peaceful way.
Scott | 4:43 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Mormons have not stepped over the line, they have DRAWN the line. There is no hatred being spewed, just a declaration of what is not right or good for society. Yes selfish people will do whatever they want, "calling evil good, and good, evil" but it will never be the right thing to do. It is wrong and will always be wrong. Until God says otherwise.
There is a larger agenda ... | 4:44 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
I used to think the majority of gay marriage supporters were just trying to get some form of basic recognition - and not looking to shove it down others throats. However, if that were the case, it makes me wonder why a civil union would not be sufficient?

Still, if one looks at the recent legal attacks on organizations affiliated with religious institutions in Americans by gay activists leveraging their newly-established rights as gay married couples (eg Catholic orphanages or even the Boy Scouts), it's clear that the gay activist lobby groups like LAMBDA and HRC definitely have a larger agenda in mind to hurt or change churches to the point they either go away (eg get their IRS tax-exempt status stripped) or have them change their fundamental values to accommodate gay clergy or laity.
You will have to kill us tyrants | 4:45 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
B. Heath,

"It's so ironic that this Rodriguez woman would ask that people respect democracy and the will of the voters. Are civil rights subject to the whim of the voting public?"

Marriage isn't a civil right. You can lie all you want but the right to vote unlike marriage is our civil right.

"All I can say is, this is going to get a lot worse and, if the civil rights struggles of the 1960's are any indication, we are in for a lot of social upheaval as gay Americans stand up and say: "No more. We deserve the same rights that you enjoy and we will fight to the death to protect them!"

And we will fight to the death to protect our right to make the law. Do not threaten us, or attempt to intimidate us because you can have our dead bodies but not our obedience. You have the same rights as us and we have never discriminated against you and those who agree with you are tyrants who want to force the majority to change the law that any gay person can benefit from because you think you are our masters.
Kelly | 4:47 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
No one should have to get a ballot passed in order to KEEP their rights or to win their rights. Just imagine if it had been up to a popular vote when slavery was abolished or women won the right to vote..what is that about. The majority should NEVER get to vote away the rights of the minority. Keep pushing your hate and it will backfire on you. Keep taking away rights and your rights will be next. Wake up and smell the future. The Mormon Church put themselves in this battle, so be it. Oh and as a final note, I am totally disgusted by the behavior of people that have nothing better to do than to try to take away or keep away others rights. If the church keeps messing around in states rights, their rights will be the next to go....peace.
Mike | 4:47 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
This is simply amazing... these protests aren't being organized by the major gay organizations - they are being put together by people who are outraged that a religious organization would dare put their dogma into a state constitution. We have separation of church and state in this country - and people are waking up to the fact of "who's rights are next?" This whole proposition 8 thing is going to backfire and do for gay marriage what years of lobbying could never do. It will galvanize ALL AMERICANS to realize that it is wrong to discriminate. This is the first time that minority rights have been voted away by a majority - and people are slowing waking up to the injustice of that. Doesn't matter if you are gay or straight, married or not... people intuitively know it is WRONG. The bigots will lose, and they know it. Equality will prevail!
francis kelly | 4:47 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
honosectually is now a constitutional right? give me a break
Cat | 4:47 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Interesting.

First California decides that, yes, not allowing Gays the civil right to marry is unconstitutional. Then people and churches got mad because they didn't have a say in the decision to whether or not Gays should be allowed to marry and they commence on creating a Proposition to have it defined because they deemed it an affront to the church...even though the "claim" was that it was because it should have gone through a democratic vote.
So after this close election, people decided for Prop 8 (and from what I've seen people voted for this for il-informed reasons...yes they were il-informed) and Gay Activists are rallying to make the nation pay attention to this insult.
I believe that there are some things that people should not vote on, like this. I feel that California had every correct intention to protect the basic civil rights of their citizens when they did this and the people crying foul should have just accepted it.

Ask yourselves why they didn't just accept this decision as a form of protecting citizens' rights.
Angela | 4:47 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
In simple terms this country was founded on Freedom and the Pursuit of Happiness. Live and Let Live
LDS CORPORATION | 4:49 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Equality will win! Gay people will have the right to marry. We're only talking about how long we have to wait. Let's have homosexuals and the Mormons come to a settlement which should make everyone happy - Let's set a minimum age for consent and let's say the parties have to be human beings, as long as the parties meet those two minimum requirements they can get married - heck, let's even say they can marry as many as they want - who cares (except the religious zealots and "traditonal thinkers")
John | 4:49 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Why did the Morman Church spend so much money trying to pass Prop. 8? Who gains? Gay marriage does nothing to threaten heterosexual marriage. Polygamy does much more to threaten it. Polygamy has been a part of the Morman Church for a long time as has having under-age girls marry. Talk about threatening traditional marriage!

Plus it is interesting that the Christian right has, for the most part, attacked homosexuality on every front. What is it, exactly, that they are afraid of? On the list of things to worry about, I'd think a gay couple as neighbors is pretty far down the list.

The anti-homosexual fervor has much more to do with the powerlessness of it's advocates than it does any threat from gay people.
Tenderheart | 4:50 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
While I disagree that calling a same-sex union a "marriage" has anything to do with civil rights, I still suggest that those who believe it does might take a hint from Dr. Martin Luther King about non-violence. Please re-read some of his speeches and upgrade your behavior.
Meanwhile, we have already had the word "gay" stolen so that little children can no longer sing the "Kookaburra" song (among others) and women named Gay are embarrassed in public. Please don't now steal the word "marriage" by trying to make it mean something else.
Yes, it does steal something from the real thing when counterfeits can be called by the same name.
Tyrants are always annoying | 4:49 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
ANNOYING!,

"Not only are you closing major streets down, but the commuter's on these streets are ANNOYED with all of you! (even those who voted no on 8), AND the fact that this is "after-the-fact."

Do you think these voters care about the voters who are trying to get to work but can't because they are exercising their right to assemble. How many people must be inconvenienced so that they can protest the right of the majority to make the law?

"The voice of the people spoke LOUD AND CLEAR in ALL 3 STATES! Give it a rest. Mask's are off and everyone really see's who you are. And it's not pretty. It's ANNOYING! Just like it would be if I were to stand outside the front of the white house with my McCain sign throwing a 3-year old temper tantrum, because Obama is now the president.
A N N O Y I N G!"

You are right. The people chose Obama as President and I voted for him as well. I wouldn't protest him since he is my President but those who support same sex marriage don't understand that the people have spoken. They are tyrants. Nothing more!
Expat | 4:51 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
New Yorker

Too bad. Were gonna keep pushing. Your threats don't scare us. We survived Republicans blocking AIDS funding, and we'll survive whatever you people throw at us. You have a choice America, more of the protests or FULL civil rights for Gays. What you WONT get is continued discrimination against Gays and quiet Gays.

While we'd like to have tolerance, civility, acceptance, respect, and our civil rights, if we have to jettison the first four to get our civil rights we will. Besides, we never got any tolerance or civility from the Pro H8 crowd. Voting to destroy someones marriage is hateful. Period. By the way, I'd like to see Gay civil unions laws in Utah before the Mormons say another word about this not being Mormons hating Gays.

Sorry about ruining the word Gay for you. People such as yourself have ruined the word Christian for millions of us. So I guess we're square on that one huh.

You can keep your supposed tolerance, civility, acceptance and respect. We'll take our civil rights.
Dominique | 4:51 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
For those of us who were actually there, this is a very poorly written report of what took place. Tell what we talked about. Don't just pull out sensationalistic quotes from the middle of speeches.

Were you even there?
How ironic???? | 4:51 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Mormons have tried to have multiple wives for eons and now they've bankrolled to keep a class of citizens from having even one???? You coulnd't make this up, really!!
tony | 4:53 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Gays in California have been rebuked by the voters again and again and even have a Constitutional Amendment banning gay marriage which the gays want to disobey. That is insurrection and treasonous in itself. Gays that are anarchist must be shut down. Mormons, Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists, Catholics.... what, do liberals hate everyone who Does Not Bow To Your Demands?

Get over it. YOU LOST!!! TWICE!!! Face the facts. Marriage is not a civil right. It is a religious ceremony. If you want to have sex, go ahead.

"GBLT�s are never satisfied. Their civil rights are not being discriminated against. Don't you dare compare yourselves to "African American blacks", "Hispanics", "Native Americans". Those are ethnic groups. You aren't a minority-face it. You can have all the rights with a "civil union". THE MAIN STREAM seems to WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU OR YOUR BEHAVIOR.

YOU CAN PROTEST ALL YOU WANT, YOU CAN PROTEST AT ALL THE CHURCHES, YOU CAN PROTEST AT MORMON CHURCHES ALL OVER THE NATION. I JUST LOVE IT BECAUSE U ARE AM EMBARASSMENT & WILL TURN THE NATION AGAINST YOU!!!!!
I like wine | 4:53 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
What you do in your own bedroom is pretty much a private affair. When YOU bring it out in public, it becomes public. Gays, lesbians, etc. have to understand that they are demanding we support and embrace their lifestyles. Homosexuality is something I object to. I won't abuse a homosexual, but, I will not support their lifestyle.

Dave | 4:53 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
The GLBT needs to learn the art of "sportsmanship." If Prop 8 would have passed I guarantee that Mormons would not be vandalizing the GLBT buildings, protesting in their cities, or sending messages of hate to their leaders. The state of California has spoken; the majority of them prefer Prop 8. God bless America.
CO Coug | 4:56 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Somebody's protesting and mad at the Mormon Church? Whatever shall we do? Yawn.......nothing new, just different topic. Protest all you want, it wont change anything.

Funny how no other churches were singled out, they only chose the LDS faith because they knew that we wouldn't do anything in retaliation, whereas another church might come out swinging.

Don't stress fellow members, the principles of the Church will not change, nor will the Brethren bow down to threats and intimidation.
Stenar | 4:56 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
There were thousands of people protesting today, not just hundreds.
Ho Hum | 4:56 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
The prince of the world cometh, and hath nothing in me. It doesn't matter if you demonstrate against us. We still love you, and we still believe you are wrong.
Carlos | 4:57 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
If by 51/49 we can take the right of people away, maybe we can go with Prop 9 and re establish slavery....
Anonymous | 5:00 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
I'm an atheist.I would not ,however, try to dissuade anyone from their beliefs.
Kudos to the Mormons for backing their beliefs,and not changing them for the cause of the moment,as apposed to a lot of other so called religions .
Stenar | 5:01 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
America is not a simple democracy. America is a republic. This means the minority should be protected from the tyranny of the majority.
Give me a break Utah ok? | 5:02 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
All you people have to do, is dress up Mitt Romney in a dress, turn him lose in the streets there, the handful of the Utah gay community will see him, and, all die laughing at him, you bury them at the county landfill, problem solved. Why is it so hard for you to think up these thing's also?. It works. Than push for Mitt Romney & Sarah Palin for the White House in 2012.
Robert Oh | 5:04 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
Mormons, thank you. You have been the catalyst to help focus our cause to move forward. You have been the motivation for thousands both Gay and Straight to find their voices.

As they said today at the rally... "we'll look back with the next generation, years from today and say - you know, I was there in Salt Lake at the time when it started. Salt Lake City, Really, this IS the place!"

Mormons, thank you again.
Disgusted | 5:06 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
I agree with Anonymous. Why shouldn't we be able to vote on marriage between men and women. For all of you who are in straight marriages, just imagine if one day your marriage was not viewed as legitimate. How would that make you feel? Of course you would fight back.
Chachi | 5:07 p.m. Nov. 15, 2008
So let's see...this is a political issue, so churches should stay out. Oh, and it's a moral issue, and about fundamental rights! Pick your argument, gay rights people.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Image
Courtney Sargent, Deseret News

Protesters Keri Bryant (left) and Nancy Valdez cheer during Join the Impact Salt Lake's March for Equality at the Salt Lake City-County Building Saturday.

previousnext

Latest comments

This guy is just playing the system for all its worth. The singing, the...

Brems outlasts 2nd round of votes

Only 44% of the full board voted for him. How can that be any sign of...

Principal leaves giant imprint

Congratulations Roundy! ( And fellow teachers thru out the years). It is SO...

Why is this guy not required to shave, have his hair cut and wear prison...

Hansen Family, I was so moved by the article that I just happened to read...

Bishop Burton gave examples of some things that were "Tweeted" on Twitter...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

Sad that a victory can be so empty. That one person can minimize a...

Prep basketball ready for change

South Summit has the Rydalch boys and Waterford has the Monson boys.

Bridal magazines feel squeeze

Yes, I understand that Utah Homes & Garden magazine has turned into a...

Scare tatics? maybe not. Whatever the government gives, it can take away....

Advertisements