Reader comments
Utah gets a 'D' for its premature birthrate
18 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
- Prepare so an earthquake doesn't...
- Is technology making us stupid?
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- View live stream of services for...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
93 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19







Imagine that, about half the states are above average. That's news?
The primary purposes of these press release stories is to solicit money for someone's cause and surprise surprise, the first recommendation out of the chute: "federal support for more research".
The only thing significant about the March of Dimes arbitary 7.6% premature birth objective is to set a standard that shows everyone failing. "More than half million preterm babies are born, and its the leading cause of death for newborns". Yet this "crisis" pales in comparison to the 1.3 million abortions performed every year.
I would like the medical field to research this further, because I think that doctors and society put way too much emphasis on mothers gaining too much weight (of course it's a concern if they're gaining enormous amounts of it) and it is helping in this process of premature births. It is damaging to mothers' psyches. Husbands need to chill out if their wife gains some weight. It's natural. And women should think about that before they hit the gym too soon after the baby's born, too.
It's about the baby, not you. Your body's going to change. Period. It's a beautiful thing, having children, and that just goes along with it.
Wow. I guess that my marriage at twenty-one and waiting until 26 to have a baby should have meant my first baby would have been full term instead of a miscarriage and my second baby would have been full term, not three 1/2 weeks early. This is exactly what happens. . .
FYI--Blanket statements are foolish.
What are the criteria for the "D"? How did Utah line up? Leading causes for preterm in Utah? Wouldn't these be important to discuss?
About the following statement, "Among those known to increase, even with late-term preemies, are jaundice, long-term learning, developmental disabilities, respiratory problems and more, he said." According to the many doctors who we have consulted during our pregnancy, babies from 34 to 37 weeks have no disadvantage in comparison the general population. The author should check the facts with more than one expert before making flagrant, unqualified claims about disparate complicated preterm health issues.
Way to go Deseret News. This could have been a great article if the time and attention had been allocated to the important points for Utah.
Before you make a blanket statement about preemies being born to young mothers, maybe you should do a little research. I am the mother of 4 precious children, 2 of whom were born extremely early. Both of these babies were born when I was at least 25 years old... is that considered to be too young in your opinion?
That fact is that many of the premature births that occur happen for no known reason, that is what the March of Dimes is trying to figure out. In my case, Toxemia was the cause in the first pregnancy, and my water breaking at 27 weeks in the second pregnancy. Neither of these situations has anything to do with age.
As a mother of preemies, who has to deal with possible life-long consequences of early births, I would appreciate more research into premature births, hopefully to prevent this from happening to other families. After having gone through this firsthand two different times, there is no way I would wish this on anyone. If something can be done to reduce the number of premature births, shouldn't you want to help, too?
That is exactly what I am saying. Unfortunately, science backs me up 100%.
The United States has the highest rates of infant mortality in the developed world. This doesn't upset you? Prenatal health care SUCKS in this country. And you are more worried about money?
Wow.
I'm just wondering...Do have any personal experience regarding premature births, or do you just feel like you know better than anyone else, including my physicians and maternal fetal medicine specialists? Just curious where exactly you get your science and "Facts" from.
The new Progesterone shots will help some, but others can't be stopped when they come in to Labor and Delivery.
I feel that smoking, illegal drug use, weight obsession, poor diet, and excessive caffeine use are some of the causes we could educate to.
AWOHN has just published a book on Near term babies and the problems that they have. They are not the same as a fullterm baby. They have many more problems. This is new information and some of the doctors don't know all the information yet.
Let's try to give all the babies their 40 weeks of gestation in the best intensive care unit in the world, MOM's womb!