Reader comments
Many selling at loss to avoid foreclosure
74 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Business
Across Site
- UK gov't: Press must face tougher...
- Greek Parliament starts debate on...
- Boeing says it's frustrated with...
- Obama budget: New spending with...
- U.S. taxes more progressive than Europe
- Occupy protesters target California...
- Fashion Week trends: Military looks...
- Alexander Wang gets Gisele Bundchen...
- Dresses locked behind harnesses at...
- Christian Siriano brings on creatures...
In Business
Across Site
- Faces beyond the numbers of long-term...
- Homeowners in distress hope new...
- City Creek Center means uncertainty...
- Hong Kong asserts identity to...
- Fewer auto safety checks? House...
- Working at home improves employee...
- Vatican besieged by leaks, conspiracies
- U.S. taxes more progressive than Europe
- West finals: Rural residents strike...
- Greek parties mull harsh new cuts
In Business
Across Site
- Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - 19 at Gateway look to City Creek
14 - Fashion Week trends: Military looks...
7 - Designers lend their glamour to Obama...
6 - Dresses locked behind harnesses at...
6 - Penn class teaches students how to...
6 - Pepsico to cut 8,700 jobs; 4Q net rises
4 - Army officer wants humanism...
4 - Bill aims to ban Internet gambling
4







Who forced her? That's a pretty bold statement with nothing to back it up. Short of any evidence that shows she was forced, one would be inclined to believe that Ms.Hernandez made some poor financial decisions that resulted in her inability to make a promised payment.
I guess that doesn't sound as good as "forced" or "crisis", huh?
This is lazy reporting which shifts the blame of a defaulted loan to... no one.
Almost two years and an overseas tour later we almost did just that. However we where able to move into Base Housing and then we had too much house.
Living with your relatives is not a good thing, which is why we had a housing boom after WWII. A GI being able to buy a house with little or no money down.
My wife was able to buy our 1st house on her own. Later in Hawaii I finally used my GI Bill Benefits and have the house I own now. Which lost $45,000 in value but is still worth almost twice what I paid for it.
I think prices are adjusting to what they really are as opposed to what they where inflated to be.
I understand the compelling personal reasons for getting an ARM but when the ARM Kicks in they want an ARM and a leg.
Now people are upside down and taking a loss when they try to sell.
Oh, you mean you bought the house intending to resell it at a fabulous profit in 18 months?
Oh, you mean you bought the house and then refi'd to take money out when the house appreciated quickly?
Oh, you mean you bought a house with no money down, negative amortization, and a variable interest rate, and you can't afford your current payment?
Last year my wife and I sold our house in MA at a loss. We were living well within our means when we made the purchase. It was just a bad time to sell, but we were "forced" to, due to a required job change and cross-country move.
Some might decry poor personal money management, a factor here, nevertheless it saddens me to think of this couple nearing 60, to have such financial problems after their children have been raised.
I agree with "Name" 100% If the house was a good deal when you bought it then why is it not a good deal now? Simple, because you found out the house down the street is selling for less and you got greedy!
"But the increase in short sales and foreclosures has contributed to the decrease in home prices along the Wasatch Front and the rest of the state, he said." (Per Dave Anderton of SLC Board of Realtors.
The decrease in home prices in SLC is a good for society and eventually the economy. Of course real eastate agents do not like that.
This real estate bubble in SLC will bust just as much as the rest of the "World" real estate bubble is bursting.
Amazing how drunk with greed and desire to have a "Big" house has hit SLC citizens. The house flippers have had a good time and bragged continually about the money they made.
Now collectively the 401K statements of September 2008 reflect this bust. And those sparty pants flippers are complaining on how much money they have lost in their 401K.
So on to greater adventures. There is a law of cause and effect that cannot be violated. It never has and never will. "NEVER" . SO. BE. IT. 41CADILLAC
What happened here was someone that was loaned 100% or more of the value of the home. It is the bank and customer who listened to the bank who are at fault here.
Every one of them will give you the sales pitch about how much safer they will be with an agent "representing" them. When the agent lets them down (after collecting an unrealistic commission), they should have accountability along with irresponsible lenders and buyers.
With inflationary prices out of control from artificially increased housing values the agents continue to receive commission based on inflated values of homes, further driving the costs up. The work is the same on two home sales; yet the agent gets so much more money for selling the higher priced home. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see this is a flawed system.
Shame on investors too. They greedily gobble up affordable houses that owners could buy and improve themselves. They're "flipped" and affordability disappears.