Reader comments
Lawrence testifies in Hughes ethics case
22 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












Fortunately, most people in the state are on to Irvine and he is usually unsuccessful. I don't know anyone who has any respect for him. That's the kind of person Phil Riesen has chosen for his attorney.
That should make you stop and think!
Additionally we have many people running for office this cycle that switched the Republican party because of their radical social and financial stands on issues. They distance themselves from the Democratic party by omitting any connection they have with the Democratic Party.
The corruption HAS TO STOP!!! Make Hughes an example of what happens to dirty public officials.
Vote them all out in November.
Comments by Hughes' attorney give a false impression about Susan's beliefs. If she had thought nothing was wrong with the request, she would not have raised the issue. Her refusal to call the lie a lie speaks to her class and unwillingness to wrestle in the mud. Until she is quoted saying she thought the offer was above board, don't believe it.
As for Reisen, the worm. He knew exactly what he was doing and gave no thought to how it would impact Susan. His only thought was about how to do the most harm right before an election. Maybe someone whould ask him how ethical it is to still be appearing in John Parras ads right before an election. Sounds like unreported free media.
That said, the person using those words in a hearing display mental and verbal weakness.
Hughes? Nope.
Curtis? Not a chance.
Anyone know of any?
Throw the bums out!
Never mind that there is a huge problem with ethics.
Legislative leaders are too comfortable with the system as it is and they are in the middle of this one.
Time for a change.
It is all to the benefit of a few-Look at the Bank vs Credit Union debate, the banks said that Credit Unions do deserve the tax breaks because the do not distribute their earning and keep them in reserves. We just gave the banks 750 billion. I hope everyone remembers this when the banks go after the Credit Unions again.
It is easier to be an armchair politician than to put one's self out there on the chopping block as a true patriot.
By the way, Hughes did say, "Bring it On!"