Reader comments
Will public-lands rules be changed?

3 comments   |   Read story

Dave | 7:27 a.m. Oct. 11, 2008
Hooray for the Bush administration.
Geezer | 7:52 a.m. Oct. 11, 2008
The rule the Bush appointees are trying to repeal comes from Section 204(e) of the Federal Land Policy & Management Act of 1976. It was written in to take care of situations where the Secretary of the Interior might refuse to use his withdrawal authority to protect lands of great public value. That's exactly what happened when Kempthorne refused to protect the Grand Canyon. He should be following the law, not rewriting the rules.
Doug Brewer | 5:25 p.m. Oct. 12, 2008
Lord, protect us from those claiming they're protecting us. Good for the Bush Administration!!

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: 'Liberal conceit'

nice to hear some common sense and reason! thank you.

Interior's approach defended

These folks make it seem like it's Rocket Science to lease Federal lands. It...

Its about time! The story is unfolding For The safe return of SusanPowell...

Chambers ran into the UTES instead of catching the punts.....HOMER REFEREES!!!!

Man... all of you are freaking out about something that really won't be...

As a lifelong Ram fam I find that many of the comments that are negative...

Conan mocks Orrin Hatch, Mormons

I thought it was hilarious. They obviously went to great lengths to avoid...

Lives of Old Testament women

Dr. Olson was one of my favorite professors at BYU. Of course, I had her...

Small business insurance pool?

Nations Health Alliance is a Utah NonProfit Corporation licensed by the Utah...

Sorry to be a snob, but how is this major?

Advertisements