Reader comments
Jewish family makes peace with LDS baptism

144 comments   |   Read story

Justin | 12:45 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
As a young boy I "hated" beets. They smelled bad. I refused to eat beets. One evening when beets were served, my father proclaimed that I could not leave the table until I had eaten my beets. He meant well. He loved beets. He new they were good for me and he wanted me to love them as much as he did. I declared that if he made me eat the beets I would "throw-up". He insisted. I ate the beets, then ran to the bathroom and threw-up the contents of my stomach. Dad never made me eat beets again.

Some years later I decided to try beets again. Others seemed to actually enjoy eating them. Perhaps because my tastes had matured or perhaps because it was my own idea to eat beets, I found them pleasant to the taste and now eat beets from time to time.

My point is, I changed my mind. I had been unalterably opposed to beets but now enjoy them very much. I know many people who were unalterably opposed to religion but later in life embraced it. I like the idea that a change of mind is allowed but never forced.
Rich | 3:34 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
Thank you for the wonderful and accurate article. I hope the Salt Lake Tribune elects to publish this piece in order to educate its readers.
kate | 5:58 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
Thank you for this amazing article it repesents our doctrine well.
Comments continue below
COOL | 9:35 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
I can never figure out why some people take such offense that a Mormon would be baptized for them when dead. I am a Mormon and have been involved in many such baptisms. It is wonderful.

But some say, "what if other Churches did that to you or to your ancestors? You wouldn't think it is so great then." What are you talking about? If they have such binding power on earth that what they do is bound in heaven then please take me with you, and thank you do much. If not, how could I care any less. Their efforts would be meaningless and unbinding. So why fret. It is all good. Win-win. Go for it baby.
notconvinced | 10:29 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
The article is very nice and very well written. I just wonder if all of you, who are so proud of yourselves, would feel the same if YOU had been the one baptized posthumously to another religion, that you chose NOT to be a part of all your life. Forget that the writer has moved on, consider how you would feel as you pat yourselves zealously on your pompous backs. All this loving of mankind beyond life on earth is all well and good, but what about the living on earth?

What has the Mormon church done for the hungry and the homeless lately? The last time I checked, I could not locate a soup kitchen sponsored by and ran by the LDS church. Why not? Don't tell me you have the "welfare farm", Joe Down on his Luck lives under a park bench and has far too many addiction issues to figure out how to find that. He needs a warm meal, and a warm bed, right now. Tonight. Where are the Mormons? Where are they feeding the hungry, as Jesus instructed? Where?
Bob P | 10:51 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
I am a fifth/sixth generation Mormon. When doing my Mormon geneology I made an interesting discovery. My maternal grandmother was a Jew, thus my mother was a Jew and so am I, but not my children as I'm male.

That "disvovery" was made when I was in my 30's, but to me it confirms my life long, even as a teenager, adherence to Zionism. To the extent I tried to join the Israeli army in 1967 (I arrived in Israel on the 8th day and the war was over).

There is no contradiction to being both.
me | 11:21 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
But how arrogant of you to think that the choice that person made during his/her lifetime needed to be "corrected". I have made my choice here on Earth to follow the teachings of my church. I don't want someone to come back later and insinuate that my belief system was incorrect and that after death I might need to change my mind. Get out of others' beliefs.
Thanks Boris | 11:37 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008
Thanks Boris. I was about to respond to Ahmad but I couldn't have put it better myself.
Bert | 1:58 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
When religious tolerance is expressed and a desire to understand another shown, I believe we all move closer to knowing our Father in Heaven and His Son. Part of the 13th Article of Faith reminds us -

'If there is anything virtous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things..'

This example of love and understanding demonstrates to each of us how we can best build those relationships of trust that cross religious and cultural boundaries. We are all children of the same Heavenly Father - and would do well to rememember that He loves each one of us.
RE: notconvinced | 2:25 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
To: notconvinced | 10:29 p.m. Oct. 13, 2008

"Where are the Mormons? Where are they feeding the hungry, as Jesus instructed? Where?"

The Mormons are quietly making food and monetary donations, doing it so that their right hand doesn't know what their left hand is doing.

At least twice a year, the LDS Boy Scouts do food drives in their neighborhods. My husband oversaw these food drives for 6 years. 20 to 25 bins all measuring 4x4x3 feet are placed in our church parking lot, and the scouts go door-to-door, picking up bags of food left on doorsteps. By the end of the morning all the bins are full to the tops and more. The food is then delivered to the local food banks and homeless shelters.

The Relief Society women make and ship thousands of newborn kits, hygiene kits, and quilts locally and internationally every year. We are doing more again this week.

The reason you have never seen it happening is simple: It is done quietly and in our own way, while you are looking for something else.
to "notconviced"@10:29pm | 4:14 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
If you would like to know where the Mormons are when people are hungry, naked or in need, perhaps you need to not look for a sign on a building that reads "Mormon Soup-Kitchen" and look in a much more hard to see place.

The Mormons are feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, helping the needy, blessing the sick and following the teaching of Christ in modest houses, straw huts, refugee camps, temporary shelters and may other places throughout the world where help is needed. They are also helping the widow down the street and the parents who just lost a child.

The Mormons are helping millions of people through out the world. If you would like to see it, please find the nearest LDS church, ask to sit down with a Bishop or Relief Society President and they can show you exactly where the Mormons are helping and how it is being done every day...
re: Cool & Unconvinced | 4:39 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
To Cool: just because you don't get why others might be offended doesn't mean you shouldn't give them the freedom to disagree. Your own positive experiences might be more readily understood and accepted if you showed a little more understanding of differing viewpoints.

To Unconvinced: I understand the point made in your first paragraph, but you need to do a little more homework regarding the humanitarian efforts made by the LDS church (paragraph #2). I have been quite involved with a variety of humanitarian efforts and have seen much of the service offered by many groups firsthand. True, they may not sponsor an on-going soup kitchen in downtown SLC, but the "where" they serve is worldwide.

The LDS church often provide the first and most extensive non-governmental aid provided to many countries worldwide who have gone through disasters. They also quietly and privately feed thousands of families and individuals weekly, including many locally, through Bishops' Storehouses. The overall humanitarian aid they provide is staggering.
DrW | 5:31 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
I have never understood why people get so upset about posthumous baptism.

After all, would we CARE if we heard that a bunch of aboriginals were passing bones around a fire in our name? Irrelevant to the max.

Religion is just a remnant and expression of a gene that in prehistoric times played a role in establishing human society and has long since ceased to be of any consequence -- and posthumous baptism is just more of that irrelevance.

The world is filled with REAL human problems to be dealt with!


David Perry | 7:29 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Thanks for the excellent treatment of a subject that ususally ignites biases. As a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I have a profound love for my Jewish cousins. Studying Hebrew in classes at BYU intensified my feelings for them. May we all learn to live together in love and peace!
ScottAZ | 7:29 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
It is still interesting to me why those who claim that the LDS faith is false have a problem with baptisms for the dead. If it means nothing, with no authority, then why act as if it does?
Mc | 8:09 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Unconvinced: What has the Mormon church done for the hungry and the homeless lately?

The Church may not have a soup kitchen with their name on it, but ask the soup kitchen in downtown Salt Lake where much of their financial support and volunteers come from and you'll find they receive much from the Church. The food bank and homeless shelter, as well as many other charities receive support from individual wards and stakes and the Church itself, which often partners with other faiths to give aid.

US Presidents have come to Utah to examine the LDS welfare system, known for its success in helping poor families. Countries all over the world have recognized the Church for humanitarian aid given immediately when disasters happen. Starving children have been restored to health with Admit, a health drink developed by the Church for those whose digestive systems can't handle regular foods yet. I couldn't possibly list all that the Church is doing to help others. Go to the LDS Humanitarian Center and see for yourself.

Anyone who criticizes the LDS Church for not helping the poor and needy is only showing ignorance.
Nice | 9:25 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
I really appreciated this article. Especially, I appreciated the author sharing their initial dismay when they learned of the baptism, and then showed how they realized that it was out of love.

The world is full of people who only seek their own glory and so most people are wary of people who try to do good. It is hard for people to realize that what we do, we do out of love.
Pleasantly Pleased | 11:10 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Hi everyone (Keith especially), For the first time I am amazed that there was no bashing from this article. Isn't that wonderful!!! Everyone already answered all the questions Keith had perfectly, my only addition is...Keith you can go to lds.org and learn so much more about what Latter-Day Saints believe by clicking on the various links within the website. And for a more personal way to learn, ask to have the missionaries come teach you in person. It's our desire to have everyone educated in our beliefs directly from the source and not hear-say. You will still have your free agency as to whether you accept our teachings or not even with the missionaries giving you the lessons. I just wanted to give you the invite officially. Wish you were in the Annapolis, Maryland area and we would invite you to our home to learn more, and believe me there is a life-time of learning here. Take care and thanks for the genuine questions and open-mindedness. We appreciate it very much!
Hosanna to God and the Lamb | 11:23 a.m. Oct. 14, 2008
I haven't read the comments here (read plenty of comments in the past on articles); but I can only imagine that for all the good--knowing all the bad comments that will go along with the good--I will have best been served relying more on the message from the article itself.

Having said that, I just wanted to add my thought of how wonderful the Jewish faith is. If Jesus Christ truly is the chosen Messiah whom many Jews still expectantly wait for, then how wonderful it will be if Jesus the Christ, who died on Calvary, provides a way--biblically supported--for members of that great Jewish faith to still accept the gospel (What great news a restoration purports!), especially if anyone has not been sufficiently given the opportunity in this life to accept the Messiah whom despite that, their righteous actions have supported in their worship according to what they have accepted and known throughout their lives.

Whether or not someone knows Jesus Christ, at least I know He provides a way to offer everyone as much a chance as anyone, to come unto Him if they but allow themselves. The article reminds me of Christ's tender mercies for me.
To unconvinced | 12:17 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
One more thought on the Church's humanitarian efforts; wherever possible, funds are dispersed through organizations already on-site with the structure in place to pass the benefits through to the needy without additional administrative overhead. Ask the Salvation Army where a great deal of their support in Salt Lake City comes from, not only in cash but in buildings and other facilities. Ask Catholic Relief about how much support comes from the Church to their many efforts around the world. One of the other tenets of Church is to carefully husband the Lord's earthly resources that they have been granted stewardship over.
cuscoln | 12:21 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
I didn't read all the comments, but of the ones I did read, I didn't notice anyone mentioning what I that was the key phrase of the entire article: "Mom and Dad felt that any blessings bestowed upon them ... long distance couldn't hurt a thing,"

I can understand the concern over people entering names of holocaust survivors without any involvement from family, but if someone who is aware of me is praying for me, lighting candles, chanting mantras, etc., on my behalf, following their own well-intended beliefs, I appreciate that.

After all, that is why we Catholics ask other saints (living and dead) to pray for us. To be in the hopeful thoughts and prayers of others, regardless of their religion, can only be a good thing.
Ing | 4:33 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Exactly! It bears repeating: "To be in the hopeful thoughts and prayers of others, regardless of their religion, can only be a good thing."

That's the main point this article has to make.
Sam G | 4:42 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Personally, as a Jew, I find the practice of baptisms for the dead on our relatives offensive. While the writer of this article may be understanding of the practice, there are many people who consider it tantamount to symbolically spitting in their faces.

The disconnect that is present in the article is that while the author may be tolerant and understanding of this practice, those who baptize for the dead without the deceased's families consent simply DO NOT PRACTICE this same tolerance. If it were otherwise, they would respect many Jews' wishes to simply stop this practice with their deceased family members. One must remember why the family tension she mentions began in the first place.

It is one thing to accept and be tolerant of practices like these, but those who practice them should realize the consequences of their own intolerance. The fact that the deceased can "choose" to accept or reject the act has no bearing on what the act symbolically means to we present-day Jews.

In other words, if we ask you to stop, the "loving," "caring" thing to do is to stop. No means no means no! Where is the mutual respect from the LDS community?
James | 5:06 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Offensive with a capital O! No respect for anyone and to arogant to see your own fault with this rite. Very sad people. Just mind your own flock and don't tread on others beliefs nor offend the souls of those who have passed.
Sam G | 5:13 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
One final comment:

There are many people here wondering WHY Jews would take offense to this.

In essence, it doesn't matter why. The fact of the matter is that we do.

This leaves you with two options: One, be respectful and tolerant of our wishes; or two, disrespect us and still do it.

But one thing I can say is that if a white person calls a black person a racist epithet, the black person can still "choose" to reject that. That does not rationalize the act and what it means symbolically to the black person. This practice (baptism for the dead) is no different to those who take offense to it, and cannot be rationalized any more than calling people racist names can be.

I hope LDS readers can understand this. This issue is about the living as much as it is about the dead.

Make your case, but again- no means no.
Ben | 5:26 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Thank you, Sam G. I tried several times to post similar views, but they never made it in.

I hope this one makes it.
Lucas | 6:30 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Temple work has not place in Christianity. Please stop already. It is an offensive rite and no not only people of Jewish decent oppose this practice but Christians do as well.
to Lucas | 9:27 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
I'm a Christian (other Christian faiths call me a Mormon). Baptists are Christians too, so are Catholics, and Protestants but we are all Christian. So when I was an LDS Missionary one of my investigator's "Christian" friends told her on the phone that he was "damning us to hell" during a missionary disscusion we were having with her...I didn't get offended. I laughed my head off.
I find it equally appalling I guess that so many "Christians" of other faiths would so readily damn me to hell, or show up at a Mormon's temple wedding and shout horrible swear words and insults on their wedding day downtown or call my brother and sister in law "PIGS" as they walked away from General Conference last weekend. You tell me Lucas...who is the Christian here...those of us who believe we are helping the deseased progress to greater glory in heaven or those who would just assume we go to hell. As for baptism of deseased jews my understanding is work can only be done by someone who is a descendant. I testify that temple work is full of the spirit of God and important otherwise our temples wouldn't be busy.
Exactly | 10:37 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
There ARE too many problems in this world to deal with without worrying about "baptisms for the dead". It is amazing that anybody can believe this has any effect on dead people. Let's use our time and efforts helping LIVING people with all of the many problems in the world. A Higher Power that anybody believes in would not allow people to need their "work" done after they were dead. When people die they find a loving environment free of the earthly things we worry about. Not to mention it being impossible for the LDS church to find billions of "names" to baptize; it is impossible to do.
Mc | 10:37 p.m. Oct. 14, 2008
Lucas:
If Temple work has no place in Christianity why did Christ worship in the temple in Jerusalem and why did Paul refer to baptisms for the dead in Corinthians? Today's Christians seem to ignore parts of the Bible that they do not understand or they just think it isn't necessary today, but how can you be so sure? What if Mormons are really right about this?
Socalmon | 12:43 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
As a Mormon, I loved this article. I have a brother-in-law, who happens to be Jewish. And believe me, I must admit that I love him the most, of all of my brother-in-laws. (And I know I shouldn't play favorites.) Although he is not interested in joining the LDS church, he is very accepting of my sister-in-law's convictions to her faith and allows their children to be raised LDS. However, my sister-in-law, conversely, desires the children to always remember their Jewishness as equally important. This is a good thing indeed.
The Mormons and Jews have way too much in common to be affected by misconceived notions, in regards to baptisms for the dead. Nevertheless, the LDS church will continue to honor its commitment to the Jewish people in this matter, out of love and respect.
Shalom.
Common Ground | 5:25 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
Billy's mom was a Mormon. His dad was Jewish. One day, Billy asked his dad if he was more Mormon or more Jewish. His dad found this to be a strange question and asked him, "Why would you ask such a question, Billy?" Billy quickly explained,"Little Johnny down the street is selling his bike and I'm trying to decide if I should bargain with him or just cheat him out of it."
An act of love | 8:16 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
When I get the question "What if other churches did that to you or your ancestors? You wouldn't think it was so great then" I answer: I would be honored that someone thought so much of me as to perform something so sacred to them on my behalf. I am well acquainted with a woman who thought so much of two little girls that she played with as a child and who lost their families and their lives during the Holocaust, that she did their Temple work as there were so surviving family members to do it for them. She then proceeded to provide the same for the victims of that town and then that county/district. It was an act of love, not an act of arrogance. I was sad to hear that the Holocaust vicitim's names were removed from the public records. As a side note, the same Jewish community that was angered by the Temple work was very interested in the genealogy records and asked that she give them copies. She happily did so.
Imagine... | 8:24 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
... if you were to learn that worshipers in Mecca were using the names of the victims of 9/11 in one of their religious ceremonies. Could not those same emotions be imagined for families of the Holocaust thinking about their family members names being used in the Freiberg or Frankfurt temples however well intentioned? To all who've commented that they cannot understand why anyone would object to LDS practices, please try to imagine emotions beyond your own experience. This author's outpouring of understanding is truely remarkable.
R | 9:39 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
Jewish "temple work" isn't the same. Activities at the temple in Jerusalem primarily had to do with animal sacrifice. If you want to reconstruct the activities of the ancient temples, go ahead - but "baptism for the dead" wasn't one of those activities.

//Make your case, but again- no means no.//

Indeed. A lot of these people have, undoubtedly, been exposed to Mormonism and rejected it. I know that's the case with me. In these cases "baptizing" them after death means ignoring who they were and the choices they made.
Mormon Arrogance Again/Still | 10:39 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
To An Act of Love,

Good point. But now let's put a little twist on it. Not a hypothetical twist, but a real one.

Suppose I am a zealous Mormon and out of love, I want to extend the ordinance of baptism to Holocaust victims. But if I am a German (who is also a Jew) and a Mormon, I may also want to extend that blessing to some members of the SS and the Nazis!

This is what actually happened. Adolph Hitler's name was submitted for his work to be done, along with thousands of names of Holocaust victims whose names were just copied down off of the memorials in Dachau, Auschwitz, and elsewhere. No ancestor was submitting them. Just a zealot Mormon who wanted to get "blessings in heaven" for their superior self-righteousness!

It is bad enough that you offend the living by subjecting the names of their deceased ancestors to a religious ceremony that claims to potentially alter their religious affiliation. But to throw Nazis as well as Jews into the mix is downright disgusting!

The important point, if you haven't seen it yet, is to quit looking at the world through your own, ethnocentric eyes.
to me | 10:45 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
won't it be nice to have the choice once you've passed on and found out you were wrong regardless of how good you lived, to have the opportuninty to make the correct choice then if you so choose? Another example of Heavenly Father's mercy.
stillinut84651 | 11:41 a.m. Oct. 15, 2008
I have read the Mormon version of the gospel and have rejected it, because (1) I believe there is only one God. (2)I believe in the Trinity, (3) I believe in one baptism (already done), and other differences. I have lived among you Mormons for many years. After a great deal of thought and consideration, I know that I do not want to join your group. I know that I do not want to be baptized again when I am dead. I would suggest respect for others who are not of your beliefs. I note that even in the way you refer to all others as "Non-LDS" is disrespectful. We are not �Non-LDS�; we are Baptist, Catholics, Jews, etc. We are not one giant group of future Mormons. With full knowledge, I chose not to join your group and I freely announce it as need be. I submitted this same message yesterday..but have yet to see it. Please include it.
nnnnn | 1:11 p.m. Oct. 15, 2008
Baptism for the Dead is a joke.

think of it. The message to those of us who are "non-LDS" is that we don't have to join "the one true Church" while we are alive because we will have a chance to "accept the gospel" in the next life.

Cool. Missionaries, stop wasting your time and go away! I will consider it in the next life.

But then what do LDS tell us? they say that those who reject it in this life would also reject it in the next because "the same spirit" that you have here you will have there.

OK, if that is true, then what makes you think all those people for whom you baptized proxies don't have "the same spirit" that they had here?

Stupid. I can't believe any rational person actually swallows this crap.
K | 10:29 p.m. Oct. 15, 2008
I must admit other's who come to the door and interupt me on the street asking me if I've found God ect... are must less respectful than the LDS. At least they step away respectfully when I tell them I'm a devout Catholic.

It does bother me to be approached in the first place. The mere fact someone from any church tries to knock on my door or follow me to my car or approach me outside a place of Catholic worship is a bit insulting. I was once approached outside a Newman Center after mass by some small unknown group that called themselves Christian telling me my Church was the wrong one and asking me to show at their bible study.
kirk | 5:00 p.m. Nov. 11, 2008
I think it is an insult to baptise the people who perished in the nazi reighn of terror--they were and are jewish--no ceromony can ever change that.
Daniel Baker | 11:41 a.m. Nov. 15, 2008
1. Several have made a comment like: "I hope the LDS show as much understanding towards others as this fine woman does of the LDS. " That comment is well placed. It is so easy to make sweeping generalities about "them", no matter who "them" is out there. Whenever you hear such a statement you should counter it - gently, but counter it; stand up for what is right; put honesty before loyalty and truth before tradition. The leaders of the LDS church have been making statements so repeatedly that I've lost track: embrace the commonality, join together on common causes, we don't have to give up our doctrine, but we can respect those of other faiths - including the Jews of old and present. We can avoid making the childish statement that the Jews crucified Christ, we can have ears for it, and when we hear it, we can stop it in its tracks!! Get the book The Distortion, for one. Or, Mormons's Guide to Judaism. I'm the co-author of the latter.
Gaia Dianne | 1:05 p.m. March 13, 2009
This effort on the part of Mormons to "spin" the story is patently obvious and offensive. No matter how much Mormons want to congratulate themselves and have a "feelgood" orgy, the fact remains that the LDS Church was caught doing something that many (and not just Jews) find extremely offensive, and LIED about promising to halt the practice.

Please don't lecture others about "learning to get along" until YOU learn to STOP forcing your religious beliefs and practices upon others -- alive or dead, male or female, gay or straight.

Perhaps those many of us (Mormon and Non) who disapprove of the lies, the arrogance, and self- centered, self-righteousness, should demonstrate our disapproval -- by telling the Missionaries to move on --

-- Until the LDS Church learns how to *truly* respect others and their beliefs -- not just publish pretty stories lecturing *others* about doing so.

Re:Gaia Dianne | 6:18 p.m. April 30, 2009
I'm sorry this is so upsetting to you. If it makes you so outraged, why do you read it? Why don't you just go read something that will make you happy, like the passage of gay marriage into law? It never does any good to rage.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Image
Jewish Community Center

The Star of David glows in a skylight at the Jewish Community Center in Salt Lake. Some LDS practices perplex Jews.

previousnext

Latest comments

Utah is still BYU's BCS game. A little mind game: Which one of these is...

Seriously, Dick. You believe there is a bowl selection committee like the...

out of 80ish comments tho only like 6 people have no common sense. really...

This is really sad hope there can be a happy ending to this story. Also it is...

And how do they find these photos of Okur's defensive prowess? They had the...

Where to place the blame after this one? 6 pts in the 4th? Their bigs are too...

"Dan's reposting........" It was not only TOO long....but it is also just...

I hoped the Jazz bounced back against the Magic, loosing to a good team like...

Richest man on earth - Warren Buffet plays SERIOUS BRIDGE. Many chess...

Letters: Ad hominem attacks

Too funny...an anti-intellectual using big ol' words to sound smart. Just...

Advertisements