Reader comments
U.S. didn't hate Palin's performance; Utah loved her
229 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Greeks clean up after riots against...
- Syrian rebels repel government troops...
- Tropical Latin theme lightens up...
- At least your money can live like a...
- AT&T customers surprised by...
- Japan's economy shrinks 2.3 percent...
- Obama's budget headed to Congress
- JFK intern recounts long-ago affair...
- Baghdad's romance grows with...
- Pakistani PM charged with contempt...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Romney adds to delegate lead with...
- Whitney Houston, superstar of...
- White House didn't foresee birth...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Romney edges Santorum in...
- U.S. taxes more progressive than Europe
- Day after Maine win, Romney looks to...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Obama revamps birth control policy
80 - Obama to change birth control policy
28 - Romney in trouble in Mich., beyond?
25 - Obama attempts to calm the waters
23 - Boehner: Congress to overturn birth...
21 - Birth control backlash unexpected
19 - Maine: Romney wins caucuses
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18 - Powell had 'incestuous' images
17












It's true Palin presents as a pleasant enough person;
apart from her penchant for guns, killing animals
and an overt religiousity which non-americans might regard as somewhat over-cooked.
But the US has global responsibilities. Americans need to remember that they are not inviting Palin to a barbecue. She could become the leader of the democratic world, and therefore needs more than a wink and a smile to get by.
a) A purely political move.
b) Extraordinarily bad judgement.
In either case, it isn't "Putting country first".
By not respecting the debate, she lost the debate.
Other ways she showed her lack of respect for the debate was by grinning incessantly, winking, and excessively using folksy expressions to try to "connect" with the watching public in ways that some people have deemed seductive and manipulative.
When someone resorts to these tactics, it's usually to make up for a lack of substance. She is clearly lacking in substance. When she did speak she often mistated facts (lied is the right word). For instance, she asserted Obama would cut taxes on people making less than $47,000 (not true - substitute $250,000). She said the Alaskan pipeline was up and running - not true, since that won't happen for 10 years (see CBS video).
How could anyone say she did well is way, way beyond me.
Hope the rest of the US see how smart people from Idaho & Utah
Can be! Yes She Can! Yes She Can! Yes She Can!
Barricuda!
Never Again!
Everyone is so concerned about people giving Palin a hard time. Do you honestly believe that the real world is going to handle her with kid gloves? It is quite likely that she will be eaten alive; is this a risk that we should take?
She clearly studied hard to prepare for the debate and should be given credit for that, however memorization and careful scripting cannot be a replacement for wisdom and depth of knowledge and understanding that is required for such a high office.
What experience, what knowledge? what was he doing in the past years sitting on that foreign policy committee and now trashing the current administration and foreign policy? Flip-flops.
At least he should own up some mistakes of foreign policy when President Bush took all the media attacks like a superman. Candidate Biden is part of a BAD government.
Biden�s talk was no substance, i don't get any answers. The childish low blow was when Biden tried to draw a close, he repeatedly mentioned McCain: he's not, he's not, as Gibson of ABC counted it was a total of 81 times in the VP debate. That�s a very ambarrassing Biden performance.
Gwen Ifill said in the Washington Week on PBS that she hoped NOT when Jeff of New York Times expressed the wish of another VP debate.
Hey, I write from Wasilla, Alaska, my home town, and I'm voting for Barack Obama.
The idea that she refused to answer Couric's questions because they were somehow unfair is daft. She thought she'd get clobbered for answering a question about what newspapers she reads (she's since said she reads the NYT, WSJ, and the Economist), so she refused to answer it? Please.
It's pretty obvious she only gives prepared answers, and if she can't do that, she sticks to one rule: say nothing specific.
Not a breath of fresh air at all. That air is getting very stale indeed.
All her cutesy little words, folksy lingo and eye winks did nothing to help the debate either.
She never explained what her and McCain's plans were for Iraq, the economy, health insurance, social security etc.
Joe Biden won this debate hands down! He was knowledgable, informative and fully explained his view on the issues and the plans that he and Obama would implement after winning the election.