Reader comments
More deals over discovery in FLDS custody case
6 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












There's either evidence or there isn't. And if there IS evidence, how can there be a deal about it.
Sure would appreciate someone clearing that up.
Thanks.
I see the reporting as news. Though we do not have all the answers we'd like, we do have the most current status.
Thanks Ben!
Ben, I've appreciated your articles and staying on top of this issue. I guess I was frustrated because there was no real news in the article.
This is so easy...the judge ordered release of all electronic evidence to the defense lawyers.
DPS reported some time ago that written "evidence" was complete but that it would take monts to go thru electronic holdings.
The judge did not release written evidence and only released what appears to be incomplete electronic "evidence.
If the stuff is released and a lawyer can't get the stuff throw out the case for their client.
If the electronic evidence is not complete how do we know if something in the remaining electronic record will exonerate the client.
By the time all the remaining defendants see ALL the stuff that the state has they will be over 18 and free to go.....it's called a stall....the judge gave up nothing more than incomplete information. Yhe gossip mill continues to fall apart. The one child being held is being held on the testimony of Musser and Carolyn, two women who have never been at the ranch........the lead gossip queens.
Thanks to Ben for writing original stories. It seems most of the other newspapers just print stories written by an AP writer and are more concerned about stuffing the paper with ads rather than with reporting. When AP writers make grammatical errors, I always E-mail the writers. Ben always gets it right even when he writes several stories in a day.