Reader comments
Arsenic in geothermal pools becomes issue

6 comments   |   Read story

Is common sense too much to ask | 11:09 a.m. Oct. 2, 2008
Pools should't be held to drinking standards, and neither should there be clorination required if the water is continually recycling as most natural spring pools are.

Can we ask for a little common sense from our regulators?
Don't Drink the Water | 11:47 a.m. Oct. 2, 2008
Gee, how about simply posting a sign that says Don't Drink the Water. Then everyone would be happy and healthy. The government beaurocrat gets to feel important, the law is complied with, no one gets sick, the hot spring doesn't get condemned, and no expensive treatment needs to happen. A $2.00 solution!
No drinking water regulations? | 7:53 a.m. Oct. 3, 2008
It's amazing that some people in Utah -- who just lived through a major epidemic of cryptosporidiosis last summer -- would believe that pool water shouldn't be drinkable.

Virtually everyone who got sick last year got that way because THEY DRANK CONTAMINATED POOL WATER. EVERYONE, especially kids, drinks some pool water while swimming; it's unavoidable. And every one of these pools had recirculation and filter systems that "recycled" the water.

Now, I can agree with the argument that water which contains only 3 or 4 parts per billion of arsenic isn't particularly dangerous to swimmers. But if we're going to require operators of man-made hot tubs to obey the regulations, then operators of natural hot springs shouldn't be exempt.
Comments continue below
D'oh! | 1:28 p.m. Oct. 3, 2008
who drinks HOT spring water? Ick.
More idiot lawmakers | 4:16 p.m. Oct. 3, 2008
I don't think poster #3 gets it.

Quote: "But if we're going to require operators of man-made hot tubs to obey the regulations, then operators of natural hot springs shouldn't be exempt".

There's a huge difference here- the natural spring water is "recirculated" if you will on a much grander scale. The man made hot tubs re circulate the same water on a very limited scale.

I love hot springs. Life is risky. Why don't people understand that we don't have to legislate everything- including rediculous safety regulations like this one.
soutah | 11:38 a.m. Oct. 9, 2008
The average piece of chicken contains more arsenic (6-9 times) than EPA standards allow. It's because of the industrial garbage fed to chickens. Go veg!

"Government researchers found that the amount of arsenic in the chicken samples greatly exceeded the Environmental Protection Agency's upper safety limit of arsenic allowed in drinking water. In fact, the amount of arsenic found in the chicken was six to nine times that allowed by the EPA."

Lear more by googling arsenic and chicken.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

Sports fans ("fan" really does derive from "fanatic") who predict scores and...

TCU showdown has big implications

Attendance smack ? That's all you have ... your team will get stomped on Sat.

TCU showdown has big implications

Lets see, Utah fumbles all over the field, they've changed qb's mid-season,...

Reagan, Thatcher and the pope

Yes, there is more to the story than Reagan, Thatcher and the Pope, but the...

I have been in high coaching since 1963. I have seen many state tournaments...

There is no known gene forcing homosexuality. Studies indicate a potential,...

TCU showdown has big implications

TCU 45 Utah 6

But, if you think TCU will score 49, you are completely underestimating the...

Banks should tighten underwriting guidelines, to be sure, but they have gone...

Utes pound winless Lobos

Utah Alum cheering on home town TCU. The earlier poster Metroplex poster is...

Advertisements
Advertisement