Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
88 - Gay rights and religious liberty
61 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







What a bunch of trash.
Not the article itself - that's well-written, but the premise that in this age, people are still so paranoid about what they don't understand.
Instead of walking up to the front door and sticking out their hand to say 'hello,' they get out their guns and barricade their doors because of false stories, innuendoes, and out and out lies about a peaceful living culture that prefers to be left alone and not buy into the same crap we do.
Good grief.
one reporter wrote.
We would definitely not object to being able to openly speak with all members of the FLDS here - men, women and children, as we do with other neighbors when we meet them at the PO or store. That would be great! I can't personally say if Step Up! would host a meeting where an FLDS member spoke as we've completed our series of 3 community meetings where we were honored with excellent speakers who volunteered to help us learn more & the opportunity was never given .
We are deeply concerned for the people of the FLDS, as well as for the rest of our community, as they are under a number of leaders who have been indicted or found guilty of numerous crimes. It is our desire to educate everyone involved so we will not be vulnerable to similar crimes.
Why were they so secretive? Why wouldn't they answer the door? What were they hiding?
Doesn't anyone get it. They wany to be left alone.
Why not leave them alone? They don't bother you. You don't bother them.
If you knock on the door and they don't open it perhaps it just means they want to be left alone.
Go home and speculate about anything you wish to speculate about. Heck..write a book about what you think is going on just be sure to put it on the fiction shelf.
You could buy binoculars and stand back a distance if you want to see something.........then they might put up a fence....lol.
It is our desire to educate everyone involved so we will not be vulnerable to similar crimes.
>>>What crimes are you referring to here?
* the crime of infanticide?
* the crime of sodomy?
* the crime of fornication?
* the crime of adultery?
I don't think you'll find much of that, if any, amongst the FLDS.
You'll have to look in the mirror.
IMO the attitudes reflected by some of the posts here are a National Disgrace.
Amish are GOOD people, FLDS are BAD people.
Remember everyone, Amish prairie skirts are blue or black and they often wear white scarves, FLDS prairie skirts are pastel colored. Just a head�s up to make sure we direct our bigotry and hatred toward the right ones. This has become an issue in Colorado since Amish and FLDS live in the same area. To quote the Wet Mountain Tribune-a local CO paper
�Members of the FLDS should not be confused with the Amish and Mennonite families living here.�
"We would definitely not object to being able to openly speak with all members of the FLDS here - "
Have you offered for any of them to come to your meeting? How come all you refer to at your meetings are anit-FLDS crusaders?
By the way, indictments are not proven crimes, they are ALLEGATIONS. What crimes were you referring to that have been proved in a real court, not in Barbara Walthers (another FLDS hater) court?
Have any FLDS members committed crime in your neighborhood? Have they hurt you personally? Do they have guns?
NO! NO! NO! to all of the above. Then what are you afraid of? Sounds like you're afraid of your own shadow. "Oh, they haven't talked to me. I think they hate me." And what if.....what if....
Sounds like your community has the problem. Maybe you should look in your own back yard for the crime, or in your school.
Way to go Maura. The problem with open dialogue with flds members is the name calling starts and the gossip based accusations start flying.
Many accusations have proven false or wildly exagerated but still they have a habit of being brought up again and again. From education to simple legal rulings facts are distorted or simply ignored.
FLDS members have tried to answer questions....but the answers are twisted or misconstrued.
I think your point is good, although I think you chose the wrong crimes.
Let us see what crimes they might fall victim to.
A-an FLDS man marrying their daughter when she is 15. Well, not as long as the FLDS don't open the door, so don't worry.
B. An FLDS man beating their grandchild (from a failure to prevent crime A) and breaking his ribs. Oh wait, Sarah and her stories were a myth, well take that one off.
C. People getting fradulent welfare money. This does not directly hurt you, and as a regular citizen knowing people will try it, you can't do anything.
D. Someone marrying more than one wife. Unless you think FLDS men falsely represent that they do not have a first wife, which is not the case, this is an unlikely crime.
E. The FLDS killing all the dogs on their (the FLDS) property. The problem with this is, A. there is no compelling evidence to support this happened at Colorado City, B, I am not sure that killing dogs is criminal, and C since they do it on their property it will not hurt you as a neighbor.
Indictments are accusations not convictions. The case merely has to be plausible.
Nice of you to bring up the dogs Lambert. It seems that after an attack by a dog on a child Jeffs ordered the elimination of all dogs.
Some say cruel...others say effective. I live near a small Tx. town that had a stray dog problem. The city council declared open season on the animals. Seems like ole Jeffs fits right in here in Texas.