Reader comments
Alcohol regulation protects community
34 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- John B. Quigley: American forces do...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- In our opinion: Tinkering with...
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Voting for principals
- Readers' forum: Bush's failed policies
- John Florez: The changing face of...
- The winners and the losers
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Obama's assault on the poor
62 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
51 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Economic chaos ahead
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letters: Rights of conscience
22 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - Letter: Require drug tests
19







Perhaps this is what Utah already has, perhaps we can improve on what we have.
I don't like the idea of a religion however stating specifically what particular laws ought to be. What brought me to this conclusion is the wierd laws that Islam has, women must be covered, not be able to drive, not get educated. etc.
Not only moslems, catholics if they could would outlaw reading the scriptures, birth control.
LDS would and have in times past gotten a law passed in Utah outlawing shopping on sunday.
I could go on, my point is this, society has no business passing laws peciluar to any one religion. Religions tend to have non sensenical rules in addition to their rules that make sense.
To often when a religion gets involved in trying to pass a law, it is one of their nonsenseical rules that they are trying get all people to obey.
Alcohol is more complex, however the LDS church should not try to dictate specifics for reasons stated above.
There should be a Law against Stores being open on Sunday, as Christian people will be required to work in them on Sunday and they and most likely their kids will miss Church. Mass still has Blue Laws and I have never seen a Blue Law that i did not like.
Laws against being open on Sunday or not open till a certain time. Protect Not Only LDS but people of all Faith Groups that hold Sunday as their Sabbath.
Even God rested on the 7th day and if its good enough for God then its Good Enough for me.
When I was a Child living in Mass, the Store was only open till 9PM, 1 Night a week, Mostly Wednesday. Sometimes Friday.
I also believe that if your Sabbath falls on a different day, you should be able to have that day as one of your days off.
Even in 3rd World Countries there is Great Respect for the Sabbath. This is seen as No great loss, and people are prepared and work it out.
An example of this in Hawaii is Laie Hawaii. Home of BYUH. The Town is Dry, the stores closed on Sunday. No R Rated Movies and No Adult Section in the Video Store. The Rest of Hawaii is more or less wide open.
Sometimes State Law protects Alcohol Sales as in Arizona. None Sold before 1PM on Sunday.
The Voters in the Community have the right to set the tone of the Community.
Sometimes Christians and this includes the LDS are told by those that do not CTR, what the Community should do and how they should act in order to accommodate them.
We are right and they are wrong and it is as simple as that. We need to stop feeling bad and acting like victims and stand up for our standards.
If 16,000 people died every year in an equally violent and irresponsible manner, you would have legislatures up in arms trying to solve the problem. However, while Utah fatalities remain relatively low, lawmakers are now seeking to change things?
And to say this is only and LDS issue is absurd. Many atheists, deists and other theists abhor alcohol like they should. To equate the regulation of a dangerous substance to wearing a head scarf is laughable, if not sad.
There is the reason this state is in better shape than others and it certainly is not because of our government.
Ignorance is a good example
Everyone does not live like Mormons
Some of us actually know about Currant Events
Some of us watch TV and are Currant on the World outside
We are up on the News
We are Americans
Some of us know and read the Holy Bible.
We follow the 10 Commandments.
Love thy neighbor.
Bare no false witness against thy neighbor.
This is a problem in Utah
To the extent that the church is serious about "individual freedom of choice," I would say the statement supports allowing smoking in clubs (which directly affects individual choice) more than it does eliminating private clubs (which really doesn't have anything to do with choice). So how about it, legislators: listen to the church and let adults decide whether they want to smoke while they get together for a drink!
Before I would do that I would outlaw smoking in cars with children and perhaps in houses too.
As for alcohol rules, I guess many of the anti-Mormon comments are from people who have never been to the Southern US. I have been through many areas that have DRY counties, meaning no alcohol can be bought or sold anywhere in the county. No exemptions. Much more restrictive than Utah, and yet these areas have very few Mormons.
ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT KNOWING ABOUT BERRIES OR THE NEWS.