Reader comments
West Valley homeowner shoots an intruder
14 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Missing plane found in Morgan County,...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
88 - Gay rights and religious liberty
76 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







Just my 2 cents
From the story: "McIntosh was not arrested." It's odd that there no mention of whether Hunter was arrested or not. That would seen to be at least as important as whether McIntosh was arrested or not.
From the story: "...what charges to file, if any, and against whom they should be filed." If the information stated is factually correct, charges obviously should be filed and using "and against whom" too much implies equivalency of the legality of the various actions.
To Amen!: Making an intruder "pay a big price" is not within your authority. You do have the human right to reasonably defend yourself given the nature of the threat. And the benefit of the doubt should be given you, to the defender.
If someone sues for injury sustained while that person was committing a crime, the suit should dismissed and he or she should have to pay any costs of contesting that suit.
To SLC gal: the human right to self defense precedes and is much broader than Second Amendment.
"If you think it's wrong to kill someone who is about to kill you, you are too stupid to vote." - Michael James