Reader comments
Gas saver? Bluffdale man says invention increases mileage, aids engine performance
70 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Resolution honors Japanese-American...
- Balancing act: You've got to laugh a...
- Prison sentence for man accused in...
- Snow comes to some Utah County...
- Recent BYU grad found dead in tree in...
- Mom gets prison for attempting to...
- Former BYU student found dead in...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deals blow to...
- Icy onramp causes 15 cars to crash in...
- Teaching the art and science of...
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Recent BYU grad found dead in tree in...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Teaching the art and science of...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
133 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
42 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18 - Powell had 'incestuous' images
17












He didn't invent this though he may be trying to perfect it. This concept has been around for a long time.
That's why none of the HHO/Brown's Gas/OxyHydrogen proponents has EVER produced a scientifically regulated test (closed loop or dynamometer test) that shows that it increases mileage. Ask them for proof and they'll tell you their story.
It's this year's rage. Remember the fuel pill from last year?
Energy is also expended as heat. The article did say the engine ran cooler thereby saving energy.
Don't you think that, if such a simple and relatively inexpensive device actually worked, the automakers would prefer to use it and not lose billions of dollars?
well it cost a small fortune and I will soon be able to quit my day job as well. Anyone want to sign up ?
Nope, it doesn't work. Why not? Because there is energy lost as waste at every stage of the process. Some of the energy input into the windmill is turned into heat (lost energy). A small amount of the electrical transmission is lost as heat. Some of the electricity used to turn the fan motor is lost as heat. Not all of the wind energy produced by the fan can be captured by the windmill.
In an HHO system, the hydrogen is electrolyzed from water by electricity, a process that is at best about 80% efficient (20% loss). That gas is then burned in an internal combustion engine at 35% efficiency (even running cooler, you'd be lucky to gain 1% efficiency) which then turns an alternator at 55% efficiency which then produces HHO....
Sorry, no perpetual motion here.
What's funny about this is not that this contraption is being peddled in Utah, or that gullible Utahns are buying it. What's funny is that the Des News wrote a serious article about it. Has no one on the editorial staff ever taken a college-level physics class? If so, the article could have been newsworthy and easily debunked this. Apparently, however, the Des News is willing help perpetrate this fraud, and now permit this guy's friends to write all kinds of silly comments re how society isn't fair and doesn't respect the garage inventor and conspiracy theories about how AAA wants us to remain in fuel inefficient cars?
Don't worry, our nation and society keep moving forward. In this election year, I pause to contemplate that the fact that a lot of people don't vote is what saves us.
Hybrid cars?
These goobers inventing some fuel saving device come out on a regular basis. Instead of giving them attention, perhaps you could use the occasions to promote the teaching of basic science (including physics and chemistry, please) in our public schools.
Go to water4fuel dot com or go to You Tube and type in HHO, water4fuel, etc. and see for yourelf how to make one of these. What he's done is not new.
AAA should keep their mouths shut about stating that "they know" that these can be harmful to a vehicle without stating where we can go to read about the tests they've done.
I'm looking forward to his website to find out his results. $500??? Or making it myself??? Either way I'd put it on my 93' Corolla just to see.
That tv commercial where the mom drives her kid from their house to the next door neighbor's hits pretty close to home. I've seen very similar actions (although not quite that ridiculous) in my own 'hood. Parents driving their kids to the high school which is 300 feet from our neighborhood (or kids driving themselves, I guess so they can conserve energy to run around egging cars and TP'ing houses at night); neighbors driving to another neighbor's six or seven houses away (no heavy packages or other stuff to deliver either); active healthy people driving to the church that is right inside our neighborhood when it's a beautiful Sunday.
Hey, and when you are "forced" to walk (like in a mall) try to pick up the pace a bit, ok? I see many walking so slowly in the mall it's like they're afraid they might burn some calories. Same goes for crossing the street, although they get kudos for walking.
Flight: Wright Brothers - invented the airplane while running a bicycle shop.
Television: Philo Farnsworth - a farmboy from Idaho invented the television. He got his initial ideas while plowing a field.
Personal Computers: several prominent computer firms began in garages.
If this guy's invention really works, then he should approach some venture capital firms to get some funding for product development, production, and marketing.
I also took basic chemistry as well as a couple of Thermodynamics courses in my mechanical engineering undergraduate coursework and so I'm "familiar" with the term entropy that you like to use. To assume that the combustible engine is completely efficient and cannot be improved is to err. There are methods and means of improving the amount of energy that is converted into motion, that's what being an inventor/engineer is all about. The story doesn't say that the inventor is claiming to create energy from nothing. Of course some efficiency gaining techniques can actually decrease the longevity of the motor. In the long run, which solution will incur the greater cost/risk?