Reader comments
Grocery store employee accused of having sex with teenage baggers
41 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
101 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












"Assuming these teen baggers are male, I'm sure they violently resisted her advances and are traumatized by the whole thing"
If comments like these were made in a forum discussing the rape of two teenage girls by a supervisor, they would surely be deemed too offensive, childish, and dangerously naieve to be posted! Yet here they sit, evidence of the continued stupidity of mankind.
If a handsome (or otherwise) male manager/teacher coerces a minor girl into having sex, it is still labeled for what it is. Rape. The act of a predatory, evil deviant not fit to interact with society and he is rightfully removed from it.
Yet change the pronoun descriptions and the fault is suddenly on the victim? Compulsion is still compulsion, and sex with minors is still illegal. Boys will be boys is not a valid excuse for corruption of the young. Even if those boys were entirely compliant and willing, this woman still commited felonies. She is a rapist, and belongs with the rest of the rapists at the point of the mountain.
Hope none of them make the jury.
If this were about a nearly 40 year old man enticing 14 year old girls nobody would be wondering whether the girls were victims. In fact, consider your own reaction if this were a 40 year old man enticing 14 year old boys? Would anyone wonder if the "boys got exactly what the wanted" or whether "the violently resisted" or were really victims?
Our laws preventing sexual relations between adults and children exist for good reason: to protect children. Adults are presumed able to manipulate children. Children are presumed not to know what might be in their own best interest.
A whole lot of "men" need to grow up, drop their adolescent fantasies of an attractive, older woman "educating" them, and recognize the damage done to developing boys' views of sex, women, and themselves when they are taken advantage of in such ways. Indeed, considering that girls often mature intellectually and emotionally sooner than boys, these incidents may very well be MORE damaging to boys than they they would be to girls, all else being equal.