Reader comments
What's best way to fill State School Board
8 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
In Opinion
Across Site
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
52 - Letters: A changing Constitution
34 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Letters: Rights of conscience
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
24 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - Letter: Require drug tests
19







There is a better way than either. Have all the local board members within that board seat either elect their own representative to the state board, or at least pick two good people to run. The local board members are the ones who have to put up with the mandates from the state board. This would be a better fit in the republic we are. This would also make the local board seat a more important position, with influence at the state level.
First, just pass a law requiring all school board candidates to publicly state their opposition to vouchers (and charter schools while we're at it).
Second, have the UEA and PTA select the nominees and let the general public vote on their nominees. Having candidates vetted by the UEA and PTA makes sure we don't get kooks and voucher supporters.
When your position on a political hot button issue such as vouchers can determine your suitability for office despite everything else, the system is not working.
Good idea, but when applied politically, doesn't work
In Utah, school officials are the parent during school hours. Since schools long ago abandoned any pretense of focusing on the 3 Rs, and resent the accountability of testing and merit, shouldn't parents at least be given the chance to learn their board member's positions on many issues which shouldn't, but clearly do, impact the quality of their child's education and influence the in loco parentis?
The recent attempt by our State Legislative Leaders to stack the School Board with voucher supports and other right wing wacko's shows the need for direct elections.
If the people want to elect voucher supports or UEA representatives, at least the will of the people will be heard over the back room deals of our State Leaders.
We have one of the worst run State Governments when it comes to Special Interest politics. Look at all of th conflict of interests that out Legislators have.
One only has to look at the money that is being paid into the campaigns of Legislators like Greg Curtis. Our State Government is bought and paid for by Special interest groups.
We need to vote out all of our Legislative Leaders and start rebuilding a good open government.
Please vote Democratic this November!!! Throw all of the Republican bums out.
Best Wishes Always!
Your 1978 Classmates
Using our current system, a few high-power lawmakers and the nominating committee know the names of the school board candidates. Using the older system of direct, non-partisan voting, a handful of concerned voters know the candidates. Which is better?
I propose having the voters, although the percentage may be small, know the candidates is a much better option, especially when trying to limit the influence of special interests or connections to already powerful state leaders.