Reader comments
4-day workweek to begin

This all sounds good and some employees may see this as a godsend with a 3 day weekend. The biggest problem with the 10 hr workday is fatigue and stress. It usually takes about a month before the reality kicks in and how workers are being affected. The actual workday will be 12-15 hours after transportation time is added, especially for those that don't live in the immediate area of their jobs. If any workers use public transportation they are going to be the hardest hit with very long days. Public transportation travel is a minimal 4 hrs per day travel time and will be the most fatigued and stressed. Then as time goes on there will be an increase of sick days used to have a 4 day weekend. The 8 hr workday was established many years ago with studies and human body ability to work safely and efficiently. Saving energy is nice and needed but loss in efficiency with worker and management fatigue and stress needs close scrutiny. I've worked the 10 hr/4 day week and over the long haul is inefficient. It's prone to excessive delays, excessive sick days, and taking longer to perfom a task.

Do you think they are going to get things done? There will probably be more recipe sharing and water cooler talk now more than ever!

Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work (Exodus 20:9)

For myself, the first question I ask when faced with a decision is: What does the Lord want? This is the only statement I know related to workweek. I wonder if it was considered.

Stereotyping any one group makes people look so shallow, doesn't it? You have no idea what you are talking about, as most people do not who make disparaging, blanket statements about public employees. It shows the same broad-based ignorance of the situation as people who disparage groups of people due to race, religion, or other traits show. I wonder what pathetic satisfaction people gain by denigrating a group of which they are not a part?

I don't mind getting up and going to work by 7:00 am. But I hate having to sit around and wait for ten hours now before I can go home.

I think that is a smart idea , It makes alot of sense, because in 4 working days you can have your
40 hors in for the week, sure it makes sense, I wish that some of the School Districts would do it that way,

The media and governors office have portrayed the situation in regards to them working with state employees to resolve childcare issues and making family a priority. My experience has been they are not being flexible with workers who have childcare issues, and telecommuting is not an option to help resolve the issue. My workday will be 12 plus hours with transportation....makes it hard as a working mom with young children.....especially when accomodations are not an option.

To State Employee:

One of the big problems is the attitude of some state employees that all that is required is to "sit around and wait until time to go home." Far better would be the attitude of making a continual effort to actually earn the salary and benefits paid by your employer (that would be the taxpayers) by doing all that is possible in the hours you have contracted to WORK.

There's plenty of other work to do on the three day weekend. Not all work is at the workplace - much of it is in the home and family along with extending oneself to the community. So, six days' labor - maybe God meant we need to move to six day workweek and if 40 hours is magic, that would shorten every day - get real!

I'm a nurse and we were forced to go to 12 hour shifts because that was what the hospital and employees wanted. A 12 hour hospital day is really 13 with change of shift reporting, and if there was ever a stressful job, that's it. Yet they manage and it is that way in many facilities.

Nobody ever said a 40 hour work week was mandatory, or even ideal. Flexibility can be very good and the extra day for home/family/recreation/exercise/worship/volunteer work, etc. can be a Godsend in itself. Some people just can't think outside the box.

How do the owners feel about these new efficientcies? Oh, that's us! How about we give them Wednesday off so we can get our boats licsenced Friday before the big weekend. When Monday holidays come around, we'll go 4 days with no services because of Fridays off. Banks are not allowed to do that by federal law. That's why the're open the Friday after Thanksgiving.

Instead of 4x10s, why not change various positions to 4x8s with the challenge: Increase productivity and get more done in 32 hours than you used to in 40, and we'll we'll let you keep Fridays off indefinitely.

I applaud it. We finally have a governor who is doing his job and trying to cut expenses. The government is too darn big and wastes too many of our resources.

Man, you used to have to get up pretty early in the morning to beat a state employee to the gathering at the water cooler or to beat 4 UDOT workers to watching 1 actually using a shovel. Now you're going to have to get up even earlier to do it!

Wait...I is one...I'm going to have to get up earlier to surround that shovel!!!

It's funny to watch the various opinions of how the same 40 hour work week could be arranged. Try the 24/7 work arrangements that we face in the military. I guess the laugh's on me.

They've been doing 4-day weeks at Dugway for years, and it's not uncommon for the power to go out even when people are there. Friday off is essential in order to recover from the other four before the weekend.

There is a push to do this in the business world, as well. It doesn't work for many of us, even if we don't bear the "handicapped" designation. The issue here is energy costs, and we the people and the government of the people are too dependent on conventional sources of energy. Management wants us to work through lunches, and reduce our breaks, until we have 2 breaks a day in an 8 hour shift. Consequently, unless the employee fights for the right to a lunch break, employee turnover is larger, because people wear out, along with the very families they are trying to support. Maybe slightly longer lunches or more scheduled breaks for the state employees would help them, in measure, even though that, too, would be more expensive.

What's the big deal. I work 5 12's, and half a day Saturday. That doesn't even count the work I take home. (oh, and I commute too....) And I have to be on point mentally every one of those hours. I don't get tired just because 8 hours have passed. The mind and body get used to whatever we challenge them with. If state employees step up with a "can-do" attitude, they will soon find that they can be very efficient for 10 hours every day. For the rest of us, let's quit whining. We can get our boats registered Thursday night at six. The state is no different than any other company--some employees work very hard while others coast. This isn't just about the light bill--it will also take cars of the highways one day a week and spread out the rush hour on others. I applaud the gov's fresh approach and willingness to try something different !! Maybe the rest of us should put on our thinking caps.....

When the Lord said �Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work (Exodus 20:9)� He wasn�t necessarily referring to income labor, rather to all earthly or worldly labor, i.e. yard work, sports, etc. The seventh day was reserved to do His work, i.e., labor pertaining to the spiritual side of our lives, church, visiting the sick and afflicted, doing good, etc.
That gives employees two more days for their other temporal labor.

Just remember, state employees pay taxes also.

Any business that is supported by citizens (state employees, stock boy, ceo, waiter, ect) should live up to the same standards that are expected of state employees.

After all we pay their wages also and the more time and money they waste the more it costs us.

What about state holidays. On a 5 day shchedule they took off 20% of the week now it is 25%. Now how many 4 day weekends do they get? Are their vacation days going to be adjusted for that? All I want is the ability to BUY half the healthcare they get.