Reader comments
Little redress available for 'support' spouses
57 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Missing plane found in Morgan County,...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
88 - Gay rights and religious liberty
69 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23







If I were starting a job I would expect the rights and responsibilities of both parties to be set out in black and white.
Perhaps it is time to become that frank.
It feels different to a pre-nup (which seems to me like a document for failure) in as much as a written confirmation of a conversation signed by both parties is just a hard copy of something agreed between the couple.
Plus - "support spouses" should consider that their progression is as valid as their partners and perhaps it is better to stumble thru University together than have one person hold all the financial cards later on.
A wife who puts her husband through college and then is immediately divorced has been had - and the courts should help.
Despite all that, I'm paying alimony. As soon as I finished my Masters degree, she asked for a divorce. There is another side here. That is the side that is looking for a free ticket and one that the court system should evaluate. A lot of educated, higher earning women and men are being taken advantage of by spouses who refuse to go to school and then divorce expecting a payout.
If someone refuses to pursue a career and either tries to leave and sue or otherwise, that's their problem.
I had a friend (male), who worked very hard, high school graduate who ended up making pretty good money despite the fact he had no additional education. As soon as he started making money, his wife divorced him so she could get as much as possible.
There should be enough evidence in the facts. Tax returns, income verification, who paid the bills, who attended school, at what cost was the education? This alone should be adequate to prove the verbal agreement. Making the assumption it is the woman, as it most often is, the husband/graduate should be expected to pay the way for the wife to complete her education to the same level if that is desired, including child care so that the spouse can then "get back on her feet" at an equal footing to his, should she desire this. If she decides to be a teacher instead of a doctor, that's fine, but he should pay the way for her to accomplish this, even at this later date, so she too can have a career that brings her satisfaction and joy just as he has. Laws/decisions should reflect this.
Having said that, it is also the case the MOST of the time the WIFE is the one who works to support the HUSBAND through school, and most of the time it is the WIFE who gets left on the curb when the husband gets the parchment and starts making good money!
This is because most men are such selfish, unethical jerks! (Don't get mad at me, I'm just telling you what the statistics say!)
If men had any honor and decency at all, THEY would make sure the person they have exploited is taken care of! Anyone who fails to do that is less than vermin in my opinion.
Most probably, her support was in the form of child care, cooking, and maintaining the household. If that is the case, she should just be thankful that her name doesn't appear on those student loan papers.
I know few couples who the person getting the degree does no income-producing work, usually he/she holds some sort of part-time job while attending classes. Also, the majority of couples I know in this community who are young married students with a child or two are receiving some sort of state aid in the form of subsidized housing, child healthcare, and food assistance. I'm just saying it takes a community to educate the population and divorcing couples may place a heavier burden on society. The single mother has access to housing/food/healthcare assistance, daycare, and grants.
Let's look at what's really going on. The model of the sole-support wife paying all the bills and managing the house and kids while hubby goes to school on their dime is as out-dated as the man coming home after 9-5 to the little woman in heels and an apron serving a gourmet meal.
With bankruptcies and welfare, nowdays it's society that foots the bill for so many divorces after "the early years."