Reader comments
Matheson pushes water study

Anaconda12 | 12:16 a.m. July 17, 2008

Fluffy articles like this are why Matheson gets reelected so easily.

Anonymous | 7:20 a.m. July 17, 2008

Matheson is fluffy too. Lots of talk. No results. No heavy lifting. No dificult decision. Everything is political.

Obama v Hillary. I can't decide. Will someone please decide for me. Now that's what I call leadership!

UTAZ | 9:30 a.m. July 17, 2008

>Anonymous | 7:20 a.m. July 17, 2008
>Matheson is fluffy too. Lots of talk. No results. No
>heavy lifting. No dificult decision. Everything is >political.
>
>Obama v Hillary. I can't decide. Will someone please >decide for me. Now that's what I call leadership!

As he posts anonymously. I'm sorry, I have to turn off my computer until the irony meter recovers.

Comments continue below

UnFluffy Conservative Likes It | 12:49 p.m. July 17, 2008

Well, folks. I am a conservative and and engineer who likes this idea. BUT...

Our firast priorities should be :

1. Keep Nevada from draining the aquifiers under both states for the benefit of Las vegas.

2. Getting Kennecott to clean up the 70 square miles of aquifier under the Salt lake valley that it has polluted so badly. I am talking cleanup of the aquifier, estimated to cost over a billion$, not just filtering out some pumped water for immediate use, which is what Utah officials have agreed to let Ken. do. Local officials screwed up, bigtime on this.

As for fluffyness,

Go without a drink for a couple of days or without a shower for a week....then,

Go put your head under a faucet and tell me that water security is a fluffy goal.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.