Reader comments
'Uneven performance' hurt Mitt, Rove says
102 comments | Read story
rightascension | 12:42 a.m. July 15, 2008
Being called uneven and unprepared by Karl Rove is like being called too old by
John McCain.
Uneven performance | 3:24 a.m. July 15, 2008
Dear Karl: Takes one to know one. Or perhaps in your case,
"unbalanced" would be a better descriptive word.
Comments continue below
uritaata | 4:18 a.m. July 15, 2008
Mitt appeared as another BUSH II.
This year the winner ran in the center not at the extreme right. Center and non partisan voters rejected more Bush type policies. Far right type policy was not the right agenda to win, on the contrary it was detrimental in open primaries.
This year the winner ran in the center not at the extreme right. Center and non partisan voters rejected more Bush type policies. Far right type policy was not the right agenda to win, on the contrary it was detrimental in open primaries.
KansasGirl | 4:29 a.m. July 15, 2008
I agree with anonymous, religion was the deciding factor. Also, the press
demonizing Mormons.
RLP | 5:17 a.m. July 15, 2008
It had more to do with Mike Huckabee than his performance.
Billy Joe Jim Bob | 6:01 a.m. July 15, 2008
"The architect" just doesn't want to admit that his party is
still a bastion of bigotry. Mitt's only "uneven performance" was
with the Huckabigots on the Evangelical right. Republicans have made their
McLame choice, and now they have to live with him.
liberal Larry | 6:13 a.m. July 15, 2008
Romney made a lot of mistakes in his campaign, but the biggest was letting his
religion become an issue. If he had run as a moderate, more secular candidate,
much like McCain has, he might have been the nominee. He seems to have thought
that he could swap his mormonism for evangelism, and that the religious right
would buy it. Big mistake, he ended up looking like a panderer to the more
normal centrist republicans, and the "born agains" don't accept
anyone, but their own. It's too bad, it looks like he has amazing
managerial skills, he's just not a good politician.
Cats | 6:17 a.m. July 15, 2008
to righascension: Even Democrats have great respect for Karl Rove although
though they hate and fear him. When it comes to political analysis, he knows
what he's talking about.
I agree that the "Mormon thing" also hurt Romney. However, he'll be back. He's brilliant and highly qualified. He won't make the same mistakes next time. If McCain loses, he'll be the next in line in 2012.
I'd love to see him as McCain's running mate. GO MITT!
I agree that the "Mormon thing" also hurt Romney. However, he'll be back. He's brilliant and highly qualified. He won't make the same mistakes next time. If McCain loses, he'll be the next in line in 2012.
I'd love to see him as McCain's running mate. GO MITT!
a creepy lot | 6:20 a.m. July 15, 2008
Neoconservatives are creepy people to begin with.
Karl Rove (Like Dick Cheney) is the epitome of that creepiness.
Romney has a liberal side that rubs neocons the wrong way.
Karl Rove (Like Dick Cheney) is the epitome of that creepiness.
Romney has a liberal side that rubs neocons the wrong way.
KM | 7:09 a.m. July 15, 2008
Its that Mormon thing. The country is fine with almost anything except
Mormonism.
Too many biased, ignorant and downright bigoted people.
Too many biased, ignorant and downright bigoted people.
ex | 7:19 a.m. July 15, 2008
It would be nice to take the religious factor out of politics and have
separation of church and state like our american constitution calls for. Dont
forget our country was founded to get away from religious persecution of the old
world.
Anonymous | 7:23 a.m. July 15, 2008
Gosh, is this guy still around? His significance is greatly diminished and
obviously misses the spotlight.
Rove to blame | 7:29 a.m. July 15, 2008
The problem with Romney is that Bush-Rove have made such a muddle of the GOP
that it is meaningless.
Karl helped dilute our sovereignty with his amnesty for illegals and Bush spends tax money like a Democrat. Keeping taxes low only runs up the tab.
Don't blame Romney for that.
The GOP has no platform, Karl! YOUR GOP.
Karl helped dilute our sovereignty with his amnesty for illegals and Bush spends tax money like a Democrat. Keeping taxes low only runs up the tab.
Don't blame Romney for that.
The GOP has no platform, Karl! YOUR GOP.
Dave | 7:31 a.m. July 15, 2008
People that use the term 'neocon' are creepy.
Ken Baguley | 7:36 a.m. July 15, 2008
You know, we all make mistakes. Mitt made a few, but look at all the mistakes
Obama is making, all the baggage he is carrying, his background, his friends,
his cohorts...Mistakes? He's a bomb ready to go off. Mitt looks pristine
compared to Obama or any other candidate. If he's not taken as V.P.
we're in deep yogurt.
To "a creepy lot" | 7:38 a.m. July 15, 2008
I have to ask: why would Romney's "liberal side" be a problem for neocons? There is a strong vein of liberalism that runs through so-called "neo conservatism." You might want to investigate the origins of the term.
charliejdog | 7:44 a.m. July 15, 2008
Anonymous is so right r-e-l-i-g-i-o-n was the reason.
Dave from Carolina | 7:44 a.m. July 15, 2008
The fact that Rove is from Utah is nothing Utah wants to brag about. Rove is a
weasel. McCain and his Mommy went out of their way to disparage Mormons as did
Huckabee, Romney should run as a Independent next time and stay away from these
folks. McCain will never get my vote ,even if Romney is the VP.
ABRanteweia | 7:53 a.m. July 15, 2008
Everyone makes mistakes except JESUS CHRIST. If McCain picks Romney as his VP he
will definitely win the general election on November. I'm so thankful to
Karl Rove for hurting Mitt Romney as of uneven performance in his campaign. It
is a great lesson for Mitt and particularly help learning from his past
mistakes.
Note:
Please correct mine if necessary to be amended.
Note:
Please correct mine if necessary to be amended.
Klissa | 7:56 a.m. July 15, 2008
I would rather have a man of integrety than a political expert. As far as
libral or even most mainstream politics - look where that has gotten us now. I
never thought I would see the day when honesty, , morality, respect and family
values were a detriment. People who complain about religion should look at the
faith and forsight of the crafters of the Constitution and Declaration of
Independence. Our biggest fight has to be won in our own country and liberalism
is not the answer. Our educational system is irrational and expensive and
failing our children. It is not to late but we need more leaders like Mitt
Rominey.
deercrest | 7:58 a.m. July 15, 2008
Rove exposes the presidential election process for the sham it is when he calls
out mitt's 'uneven performance'. as in a performer who's
been hired to entertain us, but falls short. is that really what we want in a
president?
oh and here's some of mitt's comments to the CPAC that rove is SO proud of:
"I'm convinced that unless America changes course, we could become the France of the 21st century"
and talking about mitt dividing the GOP:
"Frankly, in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror."
both John Stewart and I had the same response to that gem. look it up.. it's quite succinct.
I say good riddance to that 'uneven performer'
now if rove would only do the same.
oh and here's some of mitt's comments to the CPAC that rove is SO proud of:
"I'm convinced that unless America changes course, we could become the France of the 21st century"
and talking about mitt dividing the GOP:
"Frankly, in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror."
both John Stewart and I had the same response to that gem. look it up.. it's quite succinct.
I say good riddance to that 'uneven performer'
now if rove would only do the same.
gratedane | 8:09 a.m. July 15, 2008
MITT 2012! As far as creepiness goes, can't do worse than Michael Moore or
Dennis Kuchinich.
1776 | 8:14 a.m. July 15, 2008
Karl Rove being a boastful political guru is the main chracter that I don't
approve. Be humble and point out the positive suggestions that would grab the
attention. Be optimistic!
Romney was new at national-level politics and I am sure that he learned some things including being firm to stand for what he believes in instead of flip-flopping around the issues. Waving hands to him for rescuing the 2002 Winter Olympics from bad publicity to getting rid of greedy people. If you had read his book on it, I like his organizational style that gave this event a big positive turnaround. Other hosts had asked for copies of how to run the olympics.
As the savior of the 2000 Winter Olympics, he could rescue the faltering economy we are facing,just like Bill Clinton's success in pulling America from deep debt.
Romney was new at national-level politics and I am sure that he learned some things including being firm to stand for what he believes in instead of flip-flopping around the issues. Waving hands to him for rescuing the 2002 Winter Olympics from bad publicity to getting rid of greedy people. If you had read his book on it, I like his organizational style that gave this event a big positive turnaround. Other hosts had asked for copies of how to run the olympics.
As the savior of the 2000 Winter Olympics, he could rescue the faltering economy we are facing,just like Bill Clinton's success in pulling America from deep debt.
Ernest T. Bass | 8:30 a.m. July 15, 2008
Romney never did hold firm. To become Gov of MA he had to lean left and become a
moderate liberal. In order to gain the presidential nominee he had to lean right
and become very conservative.
Most people saw right through that.
Before he dropped out of the race he was talking to Detroit auto makers. He said he would lift any fuel-efficiency requirements on Amercian made cars. That right there tells you how he just adjusted the message to tha audience. Who in their right mind would think lowering fuel efficiency would HELP the auto industry? American car aren't selling and a big reason is that they aren't fuel efficient enough. Lifting that standard would have hastened the downfall of the US auto industry.
The real Mitt may have made a fine president. The Mitt we saw who was trying too hard to fit in to the far right wouldn't have made a good president.
Obama will win and will be great. Now if Obama were to pick Mitt as a running mate, that would be even better.
Most people saw right through that.
Before he dropped out of the race he was talking to Detroit auto makers. He said he would lift any fuel-efficiency requirements on Amercian made cars. That right there tells you how he just adjusted the message to tha audience. Who in their right mind would think lowering fuel efficiency would HELP the auto industry? American car aren't selling and a big reason is that they aren't fuel efficient enough. Lifting that standard would have hastened the downfall of the US auto industry.
The real Mitt may have made a fine president. The Mitt we saw who was trying too hard to fit in to the far right wouldn't have made a good president.
Obama will win and will be great. Now if Obama were to pick Mitt as a running mate, that would be even better.
creepy is as creepy does | 8:54 a.m. July 15, 2008
Sorry gratedane,
the mere THOUGHT of Rove and Cheney's creepy mugs side-by-side is more than enough to give anybody the willies.
And THESE are the Neocon's heroes.
I blindfold my kids eyes whenever these two appear on tv.
the mere THOUGHT of Rove and Cheney's creepy mugs side-by-side is more than enough to give anybody the willies.
And THESE are the Neocon's heroes.
I blindfold my kids eyes whenever these two appear on tv.
classic conservative | 8:53 a.m. July 15, 2008
The real and true reason Mitt Romney lost the nomination was that independents
and democrats were allowed to vote in New Hampshire's primary election.
This gave McCain the momentum to win the whole thing. Registered republicans
overwhelmingly favored Romney in that state. Had only registered republicans
voted, he would've won that first all important election. He would've
been unstoppable. By the way, we have the neocons to thank for that!
They're the ones who're in the heirarchy in the RNC who make the
nominating rules.
John | 9:00 a.m. July 15, 2008
to the vast majority of people, the US voters, that follow the mainstream
Christian, in the true and accpeted form of the word, religions Mormonism is
viewed as a lawless, polygamous, unthinking cult throughout the United States
and the rest of the world that has even heard of Mormons .. it's really as
simple as that .. they would rather let Jack Kervorkian look after Nana than
vote a Mormon into a position of power ..
sunnykc | 9:01 a.m. July 15, 2008
I agree the religion factor did not help. As someone added: there are TOO MANY
bigoted, ignorant people out there. There are also a great many who hate
anything/anyone that smacks of too much wholesomeness...the "too good to be
true" mentality. That said, McCain should pick Romney as his running mate
as he'll then be just number two on the ticket plus I think the country has
gotten used to the "Mormon thing." Mitt has more smarts and integrity
than any politician out there and the voters should focus on that!
Anon | 9:06 a.m. July 15, 2008
Wake up Mormons. The Republican party bounced Mitt due to religion and takes
you for granted. The only reason Mormons are largely Republicans is because of
the pandering handout and social policies of the Dems.
The Mormon ethos does not really fit well as a Rep or a Dem. The ethos is a blend of individual responsibility coupled with real compassion and constructive community cooperation.
The Mormons should find like-minded groups and start a third party. In 25 years it might be viable. Until then the Mormons will be nothing more that the water carriers for the Reps.
The Mormon ethos does not really fit well as a Rep or a Dem. The ethos is a blend of individual responsibility coupled with real compassion and constructive community cooperation.
The Mormons should find like-minded groups and start a third party. In 25 years it might be viable. Until then the Mormons will be nothing more that the water carriers for the Reps.
Observer | 9:12 a.m. July 15, 2008
Whether or not anyone likes Karl Rove, he is an absolute political genius. For
his family's sake, he has chosen the right time to get out of politics. I
think we all really knew that America was not ready for Mitt Romney; but we will
definitely need him in four years. I think he will stay in the spotlight and
come out swinging with the right message at the right time to win.
Obama Republican | 9:12 a.m. July 15, 2008
The problem Romney has and all National LDS candidates will always have in the
republican party is the Radical Christian Right. The Christian Right is no
friend to Utah or to LDS as a whole.
We have our place in Politics but we are not welcome at this point on the national platform. I was asked after the Romney campaign was suspended by my Jewish Chiropractor this question. "how do you feel now that you know you are a minority?" He could see so clearly that we are not accepted!
We have our place in Politics but we are not welcome at this point on the national platform. I was asked after the Romney campaign was suspended by my Jewish Chiropractor this question. "how do you feel now that you know you are a minority?" He could see so clearly that we are not accepted!
NON-BELIVER | 9:15 a.m. July 15, 2008
YOU CAN CALL ROWE ALL THE NAMES YOU WANT. I DON'T DISAGREE. ROMNEY LOST
BECAUSE HE DIDN'T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT WHAT HE STOOD FOR. HE CHANGED HIS MIND
SO MANY TIMES THAT EVERYONE WAS CONFUSED. HE WENT THE WAY THE WIND WAS BLOWING.
HE DID NOT DESERVE THE NOMINATION. KENNEDY FACED BIGGER ODDS THAN ROMNEY.
Sashay to the right | 9:20 a.m. July 15, 2008
Mitt would have been a lot better off to run as the same person who was elected
governor of Massachusetts. Insiders will tell you that is the true Mitt Romney.
Instead, he moved significantly to the right, to distinguish himself from those
who were then the front-runners: McCain and Giuliani, both of whom are seen as
moderates. Mitt's hope to garner the religious right vote was dashed when
Huckabee came in with a better conservative pedigree. It's as simple as
that. It is typical Mormon persecution complex to suggest it was only religion
which did him in. It was a factor, but certainly not the main one. It could have
been overcome with a more honest, true-to-his-ideals campaign.
another NN - neocon nasty | 9:28 a.m. July 15, 2008
Karl Rove is a liar and a scoundrel. He is not a patriot but a pure partisan, as
his own record proved long before now.
The other night Rove lied about the liberal reaction to the Sept. 11 attacks and again exploited patriotism for narrow partisan advantage in a time of war. He seeks to divert public opinion from the failures of the Bush administration by suppressing dissent, stigmatizing "liberals" and returning to the same old tactics that the Republican far right has used ever since the McCarthy era.
The other night Rove lied about the liberal reaction to the Sept. 11 attacks and again exploited patriotism for narrow partisan advantage in a time of war. He seeks to divert public opinion from the failures of the Bush administration by suppressing dissent, stigmatizing "liberals" and returning to the same old tactics that the Republican far right has used ever since the McCarthy era.
Tuffy Parker | 9:28 a.m. July 15, 2008
I rarely agree with you ETB, but this time you're right on the money.
Rommey tried the Bill Clinton model for defining his positions. Obama is trying
the same thing which may ultimately cost him an election that is essentially
being handed to him.
Clinton was perhaps the the most masterful politician of modern times with his uncanny ability to fool most of the people, most of the time. Romney and Obama simply are not up to that task and will always be better served being themselves.
Clinton was perhaps the the most masterful politician of modern times with his uncanny ability to fool most of the people, most of the time. Romney and Obama simply are not up to that task and will always be better served being themselves.
the high point? | 9:30 a.m. July 15, 2008
I thought this was interesting;
"Rove said he believed Romney's exit from the GOP campaign was a high point for the former Massachusetts governor..."
"Rove said he believed Romney's exit from the GOP campaign was a high point for the former Massachusetts governor..."
I agree with the screamer | 9:31 a.m. July 15, 2008
Even though he hurt my ears saying it, he's right. JFK had a harder road
overcoming his religion than did Romney. Romney's problem was
shape-shifting more than religion.
Wrote the book on nasty | 9:32 a.m. July 15, 2008
Evidently Rove believes that demonizing Democrats and liberals will distract the
nation from the Bush administration's failures. That tactic has certainly
served him well in the past, when he managed to divert attention from the
failure to deal with the terrorist threat before 9/11, the failure to speak
honestly about the alleged threat from Iraq and the failure to plan
intelligently for the Iraq invasion and its aftermath. We have paid an enormous
price for those failures, yet cynical Rove still thinks he can convince us that
this is all the fault of "liberals."
Weatherizer | 9:41 a.m. July 15, 2008
Yeah, I'm going to believe anything that comes out of the mouth of a
greaseball like Rove.
To ex 7:19 a.m. | 9:49 a.m. July 15, 2008
And you would do well to remember, and don't you forget, that the
Constitution calls for freedom of religion, not freedom from religion as the
ACLU, et al would have you believe. Karl Rove didn't thrust himself back
into the spotlight. The Dems just cannot accept the fact that he has kicked
their rears at every turn. The frustrated Dems themselves keep bringing him back
into the spotlight in the hope that he will trip up and they can get to
President Bush. It just ain't going to happen, but hope springs eternal in
the Democrat breast. I am one of those creepy neocons who likes Karl Rove and
Dick Cheney and loves Mitt Romney. I asked my dog what hurt Romney most and
without hesitation he confirmed what the Architect said, paraphrased: that
Romney just wasn't a good enough politician. Romney will be back,
politically speaking, a much wiser candidate. Heaven help him! As for Hussein,
his flip-flopping toward the center of the political spectrum has not been his
finest hour. He has become too slick for his own good. The most recent polls
indicate his fragile lead continues to decline. Couldn't happpen to a
nicer fellow.
BobW | 9:50 a.m. July 15, 2008
I have continued to think that Mitt should have changed parties and run as a
Democrat. It would have been a natural outgrowth of his govenorship in
Massachusetts and he could have easily explained his early pro-abortion views,
gay marriage openness, etc.
Anyway, Democrats are much more open to newness. Mormonism is certainly on a par with dark skin and being a woman.
He would have had a hard time fund-raising in Utah, however.
Anyway, Democrats are much more open to newness. Mormonism is certainly on a par with dark skin and being a woman.
He would have had a hard time fund-raising in Utah, however.
Antonio | 9:52 a.m. July 15, 2008
It is so sad that our citizens of the country have actually come to believe the
Rove style politics.
That would be smear, lie, debase, anything you would like to do to defeat your opposition.
Mitt might have had a chance if people like Rove were not on his plate.
What ever happened to ideas, education, being able to step accross lines to get the job done?
Am radio and Rove type people have driven a knife into the hearts of the average voting American.
I don't see things getting better. Only worse. The grave has been dug, and we have accepted the worst kind of politics, so I guess we will lie down now.
That would be smear, lie, debase, anything you would like to do to defeat your opposition.
Mitt might have had a chance if people like Rove were not on his plate.
What ever happened to ideas, education, being able to step accross lines to get the job done?
Am radio and Rove type people have driven a knife into the hearts of the average voting American.
I don't see things getting better. Only worse. The grave has been dug, and we have accepted the worst kind of politics, so I guess we will lie down now.
tx/utah ros | 10:13 a.m. July 15, 2008
For everyone out there that does not like lds
Maybe if you have the money the campaign why do you not run for president. Remember that there are other factors in becoming a president. Money is number one. Then a support campaign and and an education It is not based on being Mormon, Catholic. Jehovah witness or any other relgion. Religion is for everyone that believes in something
Does the constution ever mention a particular reglion no no no And if Mitt Rommney is elected great for america. If Hilary Clinton or anyone else
great for america we will have to learn to live with the facts of politics. Haven't we so far. Lets learn to be tolerate of others love one another and be kind to all.
Maybe if you have the money the campaign why do you not run for president. Remember that there are other factors in becoming a president. Money is number one. Then a support campaign and and an education It is not based on being Mormon, Catholic. Jehovah witness or any other relgion. Religion is for everyone that believes in something
Does the constution ever mention a particular reglion no no no And if Mitt Rommney is elected great for america. If Hilary Clinton or anyone else
great for america we will have to learn to live with the facts of politics. Haven't we so far. Lets learn to be tolerate of others love one another and be kind to all.
Phil | 10:14 a.m. July 15, 2008
"Have you read some of the ugly things they say about me?"
Wow! This goes beyond irony. The architect of the Bush/Cheney strategy of divide, then divide some more and polarize. Rove's politics are ugly. We're all paying the price
Wow! This goes beyond irony. The architect of the Bush/Cheney strategy of divide, then divide some more and polarize. Rove's politics are ugly. We're all paying the price
Just Musing | 10:20 a.m. July 15, 2008
Careful, Bob W, if Democrats become too open-minded, their brains could fall
out.
Anonymous | 10:29 a.m. July 15, 2008
I agree with NON-BELIVER above .... Romney "repackaged" himself every
day. He's a marketing man, not a a political leader. I also agree with
neocon nasty. Rove is a lying sroundrel to the nth degree.
Relocated Southerner | 10:34 a.m. July 15, 2008
Seems being indecisive and wishy-washy hasn't hurt Obama at all, so how
could it have hurt Mitt? Oh, maybe that's because the liberal media re
indecisive and wishy-washy or will just do anything, say anything to ensure
their liberal agenda is met, no matter the cost to the American people!
Speaking about ignorance | 10:59 a.m. July 15, 2008
Many of you have an inflated opinion of others disgust for Mormonism. Just like
blacks who think that everyone else is racist, you are too close to the issue to
see clearly. Sure there are people that hate Mormons just like there are racist
individuals, but to say that people didn't like Romney because he was a
Mormon would be like you saying you didn't like Obama because he was black.
For whatever reason, Romney didn't connect with enough people like he
needed to. They didn't agree with something he said or did. For the vast
majority of those who opposed him, religion had very little to do with it. Just
like I would never vote for Obama, not because of his color, but because nobody
including himself can figure out what he stands for except "change",
and frankly I can't spare a dime.
Sagacious Inquisitor | 11:10 a.m. July 15, 2008
To: Wrote the book on nasty.
Surely, �the failure to deal with the terrorist threat before 9/11� as well as �the failure to speak honestly about the alleged threat from Iraq� are failures with which Rove had only limited involvement; they both predate the �change� of administration which happened only a scant 9 months before the wrecking explosions in NYC. Those failures happened primarily under the Clinton gang; which should have dealt with them but failed to do so in a timely and responsible fashion. Had that liberal administration properly dealt with these problems, you would surely not now be blaming Rove and his chums for �the failure to plan intelligently for the Iraq invasion and its aftermath�.
Indeed, we�ve paid an enormous price for all three of those failures. And, the blame for them must be shared jointly between the "liberals" and the �neocons�. Neither of them make good leaders in times of challenge and difficulty.
Surely, �the failure to deal with the terrorist threat before 9/11� as well as �the failure to speak honestly about the alleged threat from Iraq� are failures with which Rove had only limited involvement; they both predate the �change� of administration which happened only a scant 9 months before the wrecking explosions in NYC. Those failures happened primarily under the Clinton gang; which should have dealt with them but failed to do so in a timely and responsible fashion. Had that liberal administration properly dealt with these problems, you would surely not now be blaming Rove and his chums for �the failure to plan intelligently for the Iraq invasion and its aftermath�.
Indeed, we�ve paid an enormous price for all three of those failures. And, the blame for them must be shared jointly between the "liberals" and the �neocons�. Neither of them make good leaders in times of challenge and difficulty.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Revive full food tax? 12:19 a.m.
- Classmates salute their superhero 12:19 a.m.
- Vietnam vet finally gets Purple Heart 12:19 a.m.
- $2M error could mean layoffs 12:19 a.m.
- Editorial: Another BCS mess 12:13 a.m.
- Party crashers hilarious? 12:13 a.m.
- Afterthoughts 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: Respect bereaved 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: Roundabouts great 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: Health care scam 12:13 a.m.
- Cougars going back to Vegas
- Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
- TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
- Witness: Mitchell stalked victims
- Bring the true spirit of Christmas
- Utes excited to go to San Diego
- BYU professor remembered
- Winter weather is here to stay
- Answers for the BCS
- Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
261 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl203
- Letters: Global warming a lie156
- Cougars going back to Vegas147
- Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil134
- George lost in rivalry hatefest119
- Ed Smart 'appalled' at testimony100
- Harpring's NBA career is over96
- Utahns want health care reform bills78
- Utes excited to go to San Diego75
For the latest news in the health care debate and how it affects you...
Amazon.com, Target.com, Sears.com, Walmart.com, Kmart.com and...
Latest comments
When Boozer was shooting the free throws, why Sloan didn't substitute Mathew...
actions, I will be forced to be accountable for them. I refuse. I am an...
What's with the Utah fans flashing the double L sign?
@mark: So Sam da Ham... you were just making it up?" I'm a climate...
"I have no idea why BYU fans are talking smack about bowl opponents. Even if...
You say to "quit whining and play somebody." Isn't that what everyone is...
Reading these comments, I start wondering-- Whatever happened to faith? Why...
All those numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...
All thos numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...
So Sam da Ham, when you said this: "Not so. Al Gore is poised to make...
Advertisements
r-e-l-i-g-i-o-n?