Reader comments
Applaud 5 Utah lawmakers for their courage
24 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: Incorporate Millcreek
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Readers' forum: Teachers came first
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- John B. Quigley: American forces do...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- In our opinion: Tinkering with...
- Readers' forum: Rights of conscience
- Readers' forum: Voting for principals
- Readers' forum: Bush's failed policies
- John Florez: The changing face of...
- The winners and the losers
- Readers' forum: Teachers not overpaid
- Jay Evensen: Think twice before...
- Readers' forum: Home equity loans
In Opinion
Across Site
- Obama's assault on the poor
62 - Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
53 - Letters: Bush's failed policies
49 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
30 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - Economic chaos ahead
25 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Letters: Rights of conscience
22 - Letter: Taxing our children
21 - Letter: Require drug tests
19







What's good for the goose is good for the gander, or are some animals more equal than others?
Or will you just blow it off as "retribution"? If you dismiss it as retribution, then you are saying those who strike first are immune to being charged with anything.
Is it OK to live in a glass house and cast stones as long as cast the first stone?
It's okay for our elected officials to disagree with each other, and the merits of each position will be determined as this continues to unfold. It is not helpful to judge at the outset that one side is infallible, virtuous, etc. and the other is evil.
It contributes to the exact problem that John disdains in other columns - a citizenry that is disillusioned and fails to engage. I am sad to see John contributing to this familiar cycle.
Most likely, we will find that each side's views have merits and weaknesses. The truth will lie somewhere in the middle - some should have been more careful, some should have been more circumspect in what they have said, some should have resisted over-reacting and name calling, some should not have politicized this.
Too bad John felt like he needed to contribute to this unproductive dialogue. Let's let the situation unfold and then, after we have information from those entrusted with investigating it, determine if ethics probes are necessary.
Let's show more respect for ALL of our elected officials.
Kudos to John Florez for another insightful piece. Let's hope those who have ears to hear and eyes to see use them.
In my experience, these unsavory behaviors are alive and flourishing not only among elected officials, but more importantly in the party organizations that nominate and support them. The next generation of so-called "leaders" is currently being trained in these parties. We need the active participation of good, honest citizens of every persuasion to take control of the parties and demand that they clean their own houses. If we don't, we'll just keep getting more of the same.
This is all about political grandstanding.
Well, they are a big deal to me and a great many others. Can't we have representatives that spend their time honestly and openly serving the public instead of trying to secretly serve themselves through stupid political games?
(Of course, Jud is not anonymous. Just call me Bob.)
If Curt Bramble is breathing, he is playing power games. Why are the underlying deamons he is dealign with that make him have to act out in these manners. It's as if he's trying to prove he's "the man".
Get rid of both of them!