Reader comments
Alpine to require pool fences

4 comments   |   Read story

Alpine resident | 8:38 a.m. June 29, 2008
I agree with the wisdom of having a fence too, but is it the role of government to step in and tell me how to live? Maybe they should legislate safety glasses when I am using my power drill? Maybe I should have to get a permit-- people get puncture wounds, right? Or maybe I need a special class to use a power saw... it goes on and on.

If the government can get involved in a pool fence, where does it stop?
what about | 11:59 a.m. June 29, 2008
What about the idea that parents should be watching their children? I am talking about the interactive watching not the "don't bother me" I'm watching TV or chatting...

Fences are great but there is no substitute for real parental involvment!
Anonymous | 5:10 p.m. June 29, 2008
This new law is right on the money. Pool covers have never been tested or shown to prevent drowning according to the CPSC. The best way to prevent drowning is a four sided pool fence that isolates the swimming pool from the rest of the property. A four foot tall fence with a self closing gate should be the MINIMUM requirement.KUDOS to Alpine Utah!
Comments continue below
I agree w/ Anonymous | 7:39 p.m. June 29, 2008
Common sense must prevail. If you own a pool and a neighbor's child drowns it -- just who do you think is going to be found liable for setting up such a clear hazard? In this case in my opinion the city is also currently liable for not enacting such a code for pool owners long before now.

Perhaps the city should simply make the code retroactive with an opt-out provision in place of a grandfather clause by requesting pool owners to sign a legal agreement that recognizes the pool owner's express/sole assumption of liability for their decision to not have a fence.

Think of it this way -- what if your neighbor left a loaded gun laying around in their yard and a child got a hold of it and someone died as a result? Would the gun owner be guility of reckless endagerment? negligence? negligent homicide?

Hopefully this can be taken seriously and expeditiously -- before there's a tradgedy. This is not a question of personal choice, but that of personal responsibility. If you're not inclined to be responsible then society has an obligation to step in - as it's not just you and yours at risk.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

Colts take advantage of Pats' gamble

They were trying to see who was the Quarterback of the decade. Manning or...

Air Force will be tough... really tough. If the Cougs show up like they did...

There is not a lack of people applying for a job, as a teacher. It is...

This guy's point is, he's stuck in a pride fight -- he wants to quit but...

MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight

Wow! There sure are some strong feelings about this.

I just looked at the seer stone on the internet. This is the first time I...

Health proposal not 'reform'

RedShirt, get some oxycontin to cope with the pain.

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

BYU will be destroyed by the UTES again!

I wish I could be subsidised by the government lose money and still come out...

Health proposal not 'reform'

RE: RedShirt | 10:50 a.m. Nov. 16, 2009 To "Florida, the other Red State |...

Advertisements
Advertisement