John Lambert | 3:01 p.m. June 27, 2008
The question is very poorly written. I agree with Stark that it is misleading. The people did not establish a definition of "religion" and so are assuming that it means the same thing to multiple groups.
Also If they had asked the Baylor question, I would suspect that the LDS would tope at with "virtually everyone" for any group stated by other groups.
I also disagree with the underlying tenet of the surveyers, that accepting that belief that Muhammad was God's prophet is a way that will lead to salvation is neccessary to accept Muslims. I feel that Muhammed was a false prophet, but that does not mean I hate Muslims. I have several friends and associates who are Muslims in fact.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Chris Plummer | 6:29 p.m. June 27, 2008
that persecution complex is in full swing. thats the problem with believing that only your religion gets you to the celestial kingdom.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Anonymous | 6:36 p.m. June 27, 2008
Intolerance at its best.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
To John Lambert | 11:31 a.m. June 28, 2008
Why would Muhammed be any more a false prophet than Joseph Smith, are they not two peas of the same pod,or is it just a matter of personal enviroment. Does two wrongs make a right, or does one crazy off set to another crazy produce a sane or just a lot more crazies.. What about just being a good citizen and using some common sense.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
In Faith Across Site