Reader comments
Utah County chiropractor to serve time for sex abuse
36 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Is technology making us stupid?
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- West Valley City leaders to join call...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
79 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18







I hope he gets slamed
Yes, the chiropractor should have been on guard, Judge Mortenson is correct about that. As long as we are not imposing a higher standard on him now, simply because he was previously accused, then I am fine. But given how short sighted we human beings are, let me ask this question: If there is ever a case (and occasionally there is) in which someone is accused multiple times for something and he/she is innocent each time, are we as a society capable of recognizing it? Are we as a soceity capable of avoiding the temptation to convict somebody in ambiguous circumstances (where neither side is completely clear) simply because one is accused multiple times?
We have come a long way since the Salem witch trials, and I am not saying Dr. Hildretch is innocent. What I am saying is, I am not on the jury, I do not sit on the court of appeals, and I am not in a position to judge. Are you? Do multiple accusation ALWAYS equal guilt? Are we capable of recognizing innocence in a difficult case? Are we?
A little attention and a big settlement to boot. Woman wins.