Reader comments
Jury hears FLDS witnesses
3 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- View live stream of services for...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












On the other hand, Texas can't offer immunity if the testimony is not going to be truthful. Answering, "I don't remember," to every question once provided immunity would leave Texas empty-handed. So, maybe yesterday Texas was looking at the some basic testimony from the girls and women and assessing whether it wanted to offer immunity.
Given that the next meeting is a month away, it seems the Texas is not yet prepared to present its case. How do the jurors remember what went on from month to month?