Reader comments
FLDS girl subpoenaed; wants lawyer removed
28 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Teaching the art and science of...
- About Utah: Boarder Chris Klug giving...
- Couple pushes for safety improvements...
- Utah Legislature boring but busy as...
- Logan may run parking patrol
- N.J. man seeks to have Vermont land...
- Drug Enforcement Agency deal blow to...
- Is 'nauseating,' 'foul,' 'nasty'...
- Salt Lake County opposes property...
- Las Vegas revises request for rights...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Crews searching recycling center in...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
- Committee will explore new '22...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- View live stream of services for...
- Is technology making us stupid?...
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
99 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
25 - DEA deal blow to Mexican cartel
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23 - Utah takes $171M in settlement
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18












---------------
How so? Malonis is toying with disbarment now.
---------------
"The girl admits in the e-mail that she has been avoiding service..."
---------------
I read both letters, but I don't see where she says that.
MALONIS, STEP ASIDE AND WATCH TRUE JUSTICE THROUGH OUR CONSTITUTION WORK. THIS ATTORNEY NEEDS TO QUITE TRYING TO MINIPULATE THIS GIRL BY USING THE HONORABLE, BIASED JUDGE BARBARA WALTHERS TO RESTRAIN THIS GIRL FROM ALL SHE HOLDS DEAR.
To answer the post above, she tried to dodge the subpoena (and succeeded), but she didn't try very hard. Her mother is now in receipt of the subpoena.
This is very good news, because no one wants this girl, who allegedly has been victimized, to be further victimized by getting into trouble with the legal system. It is good news that every person is in receipt of their subpoenas and is not running from the legal system like some of the men seem to be.
Law enforcement has evidence that leads it to believe that she was married at the age of fifteen. This week, she will tell the jury her story and the jury will decide what to believe.
One has to wonder why she received a subpoena. If she had an infant, she wouldn't lie because there would be a DNA test on an infant. So, there is no infant to prove statutory rape. A medical exam could show the presence of semen and that could be tied to known children of her husband. Or, perhaps she had a journal.
The subpoena must have been for the mother to produce her daughter this week. If so, the mother, not the child would be the one ducking service of the subpoena. This girl is underage.
Now we know that the mother has received the subpoena and that the mother and child are safe at home.
One can imagine Willie Jessop consulting with Rod Parker who would surely advise him to do whatever is necessary to get mom to accept the subpoena.
It seems that this girl does not have a child, so I wonder if she had a rape exam performed. It's hard to believe that Texas would subpoena a girl for a statutory rape case unless there was physical evidence.
I don't see where the girl is avoiding anything other than what appears to be an attorney that is representing the states agenda rather than the clients best interests.
As the girl said, she is sitting on her bed writing a letter.
I would like to see the girl write about her experiences.....we can call the manuscript "Escape from a crazy lawyer".
This sounds like a teenager writing and not an adult and it seems obvious she doesn't agree with Natalie or Barbie. There is absolutely no evidence that this girl was sexually abused and prior claims that she was pregnant have been discredited. Yet, the state which was wrong about her being pregnant should have the authority to subpoena her against her will because a lady named Natalie and her buddy Barbie think that she has been sexually abused? At what point does this girls rights enter the picture? I guess when BARBIE and her buddy NATALIE have spoken the slave of her voters will bow before them.
She is now afraid for her life.
Sad
I've been following the case very closely. According to reports, the girl HAS been examined by a gynecologist; she has never had sexual relations. Yes, Malonis should be be disbarred. She is not representing her client's interests; she is in the pocket of the fundamentalists who orchestrated this persecution to begin with, and CPS, whose reputation and financial interests are impacted.
Isn't it amazeing that the girl is capable of communicating on her own....but the lawyer and everyone else seems to think that the girl is being manipulated. Any person who belongs to that church is accused of not being able to think for themselves.
I believe that those who can't think for themselves are the persons that believe the CPS version of events after virtually all the accusations have been proven false.
The pregnant teenager has never been pregnant......is not missing......and will be at the grand jury hearing. All those that were requested to be at the hearing are not in hiding. All the subpoenas have been served.
Everyone will show up...say they weren't molested, and the grand jury will rubber stamp the inditements. The injustice will continue.
And just for entertainment the LE boys will have their snipers spread around just in case anyone stares without a permit.
Maybe because the 3rd court of appeals and the Texas Supreme court said there wasn't?
The entire issue has been about abuse and you only know what has been said in the media and those who say there is no abuse. If there is no abuse, then why is the grand jury going into session? Rather than speculate and spout off why not watch as the evidence comes forward. By the way....where are the "leaders" - under a rock somewhere I presume. Cowards!