Reader comments
FLDS girl subpoenaed; wants lawyer removed

28 comments   |   Read story

Malonis needs to go | 5:51 p.m. June 22, 2008
"Malonis said she...[is] worried that the publication of the e-mails may have created a new problem by having the girl waive her attorney-client privilege."

---------------

How so? Malonis is toying with disbarment now.

---------------

"The girl admits in the e-mail that she has been avoiding service..."

---------------

I read both letters, but I don't see where she says that.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Joey | 6:33 p.m. June 22, 2008
To be honest, I'd afraid for this girl's safety. CPS will do anything now, now that the truth is revealed that she was never sexually abused, to shut her up. CPS and even higher-ups in the Texas government with a hand in this have an interest in seeing some convictions. This girl's existence is invalidating the raison detre for their destroy-the-FLDS campaign.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
jen | 6:48 p.m. June 22, 2008
oh please you flds backers- as if its not obvious you're part of that degrading cult. The poor girl has no idea how much damage has been done to her.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Think!!!!! | 6:58 p.m. June 22, 2008
In the land of the FREE, people are entitled to be represented by WHOMEVER THEY WANT!!! Texas brought this on and that girl should have any representation she requests (AT THE EXPENSE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS!) because HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, HER MOTHERS' CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND YES, HER FATHERS' CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TRAMPLED!!!!

MALONIS, STEP ASIDE AND WATCH TRUE JUSTICE THROUGH OUR CONSTITUTION WORK. THIS ATTORNEY NEEDS TO QUITE TRYING TO MINIPULATE THIS GIRL BY USING THE HONORABLE, BIASED JUDGE BARBARA WALTHERS TO RESTRAIN THIS GIRL FROM ALL SHE HOLDS DEAR.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Re: Malonis needs to go | 6:59 p.m. June 22, 2008
Absolutly, when will this circus of horrors ever end? How is this person acting in the best interest of her client? This is the person the insane judge "bodyguard betty" assigned to this girl. Both Malonis and Judge Walther need to be removed with anything to do with this case and disbarred.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Gal50 | 7:19 p.m. June 22, 2008
"To tell you the truth, I havn't (sic) tried very hard at all to dodge this subpoena"

To answer the post above, she tried to dodge the subpoena (and succeeded), but she didn't try very hard. Her mother is now in receipt of the subpoena.

This is very good news, because no one wants this girl, who allegedly has been victimized, to be further victimized by getting into trouble with the legal system. It is good news that every person is in receipt of their subpoenas and is not running from the legal system like some of the men seem to be.

Law enforcement has evidence that leads it to believe that she was married at the age of fifteen. This week, she will tell the jury her story and the jury will decide what to believe.

One has to wonder why she received a subpoena. If she had an infant, she wouldn't lie because there would be a DNA test on an infant. So, there is no infant to prove statutory rape. A medical exam could show the presence of semen and that could be tied to known children of her husband. Or, perhaps she had a journal.



Recommend
Recommendations: 0
newbie | 7:35 p.m. June 22, 2008
This side story is providing everyone with the only available information on the grand jury proceeding. We know that the jury will meet this week and that everyone is in receipt of their subpoenas and intends to appear.

The subpoena must have been for the mother to produce her daughter this week. If so, the mother, not the child would be the one ducking service of the subpoena. This girl is underage.

Now we know that the mother has received the subpoena and that the mother and child are safe at home.

One can imagine Willie Jessop consulting with Rod Parker who would surely advise him to do whatever is necessary to get mom to accept the subpoena.

It seems that this girl does not have a child, so I wonder if she had a rape exam performed. It's hard to believe that Texas would subpoena a girl for a statutory rape case unless there was physical evidence.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
zxcvbnm | 7:35 p.m. June 22, 2008

I don't see where the girl is avoiding anything other than what appears to be an attorney that is representing the states agenda rather than the clients best interests.
As the girl said, she is sitting on her bed writing a letter.
I would like to see the girl write about her experiences.....we can call the manuscript "Escape from a crazy lawyer".
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
She's property of Barb's voters | 7:46 p.m. June 22, 2008
The girl wrote that "It is my own dear feelings and doings. Right now I am just at home, sitting on my bed. Does it sound like I have dissappeared (sic)? To tell you the truth, I havn't (sic) tried very hard at all to dodge this subpoena. Of course I am not just going to go running for it! I know how to think for myself, if you can believe it!" she wrote. "This is how I feel and I just thought I would let you know."

This sounds like a teenager writing and not an adult and it seems obvious she doesn't agree with Natalie or Barbie. There is absolutely no evidence that this girl was sexually abused and prior claims that she was pregnant have been discredited. Yet, the state which was wrong about her being pregnant should have the authority to subpoena her against her will because a lady named Natalie and her buddy Barbie think that she has been sexually abused? At what point does this girls rights enter the picture? I guess when BARBIE and her buddy NATALIE have spoken the slave of her voters will bow before them.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Anonymous | 7:49 p.m. June 22, 2008
It is very obvious the FLDS mob got to her.
She is now afraid for her life.
Sad
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Judy | 8:07 p.m. June 22, 2008
How do any of you know that there is no evidence? If all a jury needed to do was to read the papers, there wouldn't be a need for a grand jury.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
April38 | 8:14 p.m. June 22, 2008
One does not have to be a supporter of the FLDS to know that they have been grossly abused. Nor does one need to be a supporter of the FLDS to know how horribly abusive the various child welfare agencies are. No family is safe when they look in its direction.
I've been following the case very closely. According to reports, the girl HAS been examined by a gynecologist; she has never had sexual relations. Yes, Malonis should be be disbarred. She is not representing her client's interests; she is in the pocket of the fundamentalists who orchestrated this persecution to begin with, and CPS, whose reputation and financial interests are impacted.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Lilathe | 8:28 p.m. June 22, 2008
CPS would have been dancing in the streets and shouting it to anyone that would listen if they had one iota of physical evidence that this girl had been molested.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
zxcvbnm | 8:41 p.m. June 22, 2008


Isn't it amazeing that the girl is capable of communicating on her own....but the lawyer and everyone else seems to think that the girl is being manipulated. Any person who belongs to that church is accused of not being able to think for themselves.
I believe that those who can't think for themselves are the persons that believe the CPS version of events after virtually all the accusations have been proven false.
The pregnant teenager has never been pregnant......is not missing......and will be at the grand jury hearing. All those that were requested to be at the hearing are not in hiding. All the subpoenas have been served.
Everyone will show up...say they weren't molested, and the grand jury will rubber stamp the inditements. The injustice will continue.
And just for entertainment the LE boys will have their snipers spread around just in case anyone stares without a permit.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
No Evidence | 8:44 p.m. June 22, 2008
"How do any of you know that there is no evidence?"

Maybe because the 3rd court of appeals and the Texas Supreme court said there wasn't?
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Wondering | 8:46 p.m. June 22, 2008
Is everyone sure that the 16 year even wrote the e-mail?Willie Jessop is more than likely scaring the girl and her Mother into saying whatever he and other men tell them to. There is something about Willie that just looks creepy and meaner than h---!!I don't think that the media would see all the evidence that was gathered.I am so hoping that the Grand Jury will do their job --study the evidence that is placed in front of them!
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Excuse me! | 9:00 p.m. June 22, 2008
"To be honest, I'd afraid for this girl's safety. CPS will do anything now, now that the truth is revealed that she was never sexually abused, to shut her up. CPS and even higher-ups in the Texas government with a hand in this have an interest in seeing some convictions. This girl's existence is invalidating the raison detre for their destroy-the-FLDS campaign." Are you trying to incenuate that CPS would do something to physically harm this young lady? I think you need to look toward those inside the FLDS. I thought FLDS did not have access to internet? Why is this 16 year old emailing?

The entire issue has been about abuse and you only know what has been said in the media and those who say there is no abuse. If there is no abuse, then why is the grand jury going into session? Rather than speculate and spout off why not watch as the evidence comes forward. By the way....where are the "leaders" - under a rock somewhere I presume. Cowards!
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Bill Foldes | 9:28 p.m. June 22, 2008
Please give this FLDS story a rest. Can't you find some real news; real information that people can use instead of this neverending gabble that has become repetitious and boring? Enough is enough. Give us a break and send what few reporters you have left out into the real world to find real news. You have ceased to be a newspaper - You are the Church News with ads.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
? | 9:35 p.m. June 22, 2008
I have downloaded the affadavait and letter on my computer and that is not what was in the letter to the court from the girl. Nice try pro-flds websites
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Tai H. | 9:53 p.m. June 22, 2008
It's a sad day in America when the government, Federal or State, attempts to dictate who an individual right to counsel is. Completely unprofessional of the State of Texas and indicative of today's CPS services.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
In News Across Site

No. Utah sees a major earthquake every 350 years. Last one? 350 years ago.